M14 EBR
- Home
- Board: /k/ - Weapons
- Reading: M14 EBR
What are /k/'s thoughts on the M14 EBR? I know you have an opinion on it.
You always do.
>>29178024
Aesthetically, it's eye cancer.
>>29178024
Heavy as fuck even for a semi auto .308. That plus annoying rocker mags and weird safety placement make it kind of a pain.
It weighs 50 lbs and is ridiculously expensive for an average battle rifle.
>>29178024
An interim solution until they get a proper AR-10 DMR or HK417.
>>29178048
>weird safety.
heretic.
nothing wrong with that safety.
>>29178024
Neat, sexy if you like tacticool, shoots gud if you put a decent rifle in it.
Not something you wanna lug around.
>>29178024
Heavy. Accurate. Slide makes orgasmic sounds.
>>29178073
Fair enough, it's okay. But on a pistol gripped semi auto it's weird not to have a thumb safety. I prefer to have some commonality in manual of arms, especially for something critical like the safety.
It's a full auto sniper. I love using it in videogames. Never had any experience with it in real life.
7.62
MILLIMETER
FULL
METAL
JACKET
>>29178179
>>29178052
>>29178048
Wasn't the whole point of the EBR to make it lighter than the regular wood-furnished version?
>>29178056
Play with one of the Sig 716 DMR's, they're pretty different from the 716 patrols. They'll make your dick hard.
>>29178639
Fuck you, Pyle.
>>29178646
Not at all. Also the wood version was still about the same weight or even lighter than the G3 or Fn Fal with synthetic furniture depending on the models involved
>>29178646
lol no, it was to allow for attachment of bullshit and to waste tax payer money.
>$pringfield M14: 1100-1500 american burgers
>M14 EBR without glass : Seven trillion one pound gold bars
>>29179106
im not exaggerating
>>29178024
The M14/M1A is unnecessarily heavy, unreliable, large, high maintenance, expensive, and a poor shot.
-H, -10, or go away.
