/k/, you do believe in the nuclear deterrent?
It has worked so far. We didn't have WWIII.
>>28449200
Why?
>>28448561
Of course.
If it hadn't work, I'm sure we'd all know about it.
>>28448561
If I were in charge of my own country, I'd definitely want my own nuclear weapons, yeah, definitely.
>>28449324
Mutually Assured Destruction a.k.a M.A.D.
This is why all the superpowers fund proxy wars and who or whatever that's fighting the opposing superpower. Like Mujahideen in Afganistan. You know the guys who became the taleban and for whom you built "the network" aka Al-Qaeda.. The type of guys who you still keep funding all over the world because you can't actually engage the opposing force since that would be the end of the world as we know it..
And no matter where you are from this shit is as insane as nuclear war. Dear Amerifats and Slavshits please come to your senses and realize that the enemy of your enemy is more likely than not your friend.
>>28449433
>enemy of your enemy is more likely than not your friend.
Fuck! I meant to say: enemy of your enemy is most likely not your friend.
It's NATO headquarters sir.
Just post the damn video. It's as horrifyingly relevant today as it was back then, just replace 'Germany' with 'Ukraine'.
>>28451429
Can't believe I actually forgot the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX_d_vMKswE
