Would you like the CZ 75 more if it had normal slide rails?
>>28429992
No.
>that finish
No that would be defeat the purpose of having a low bore axis.
That's its point, it handles the way it does because of the slide/frame design. However it's also one of its flaws as racking under stress may become an issue.
Pick your poison, its certainly not uncockable like some would exaggerate. But maybe if you have Paul Bunyan hands you'll want a sig with 4 stories worth of slide real estate.
>>28430012
Why would changing the side the slides rails are on change the bore axis?
>>28430032
Jesus fuck me christ, is that image unshooped? Are sigs really that fucking tall?
>>28430000
>hurr bad finish
>I'm going to spend $800 more on a sig instead of cerakoting it or dealing with it because it's really not that bad as kids on the internet say
>>28430052
No this is the original
>>28430057
Dude, I'm a major czfag. I love them and will keep buying them.
The finish is less than ideal. Its not a meme.
>>28430069
Still
>>28430073
It doesn't look terribly nice and it chips, but it's effective at what it's supposed to do: preventing the weapon from rusting or wearing.
>>28430082
both are lies
I still think my shopped sig looks better than the real thing though.
>>28430092
>preventing the weapon from rusting
Until it chips off. Just saying. But I got my 75B cerakoted so I don't even have to worry about it.
>>28430102
forgot pic
>>28429992
Nah, we good.
>>28430092
not really its just thick as shit to cover up the casting flaws
