File: cataract.jpg (36 KB, 534x401) Image search: [Google]

36 KB, 534x401

hey its Roger posting from my ThinkPad Edge (e530c w/ solid state hard drive added, yes im serious)

big news in USA Today today (i read it daily, sports section first)! one can only imagine they will put it in the water sometime in the 2040s which is operationally advantage because chinese dudes don't age like at all ("yellow dont mellow")(no offense)

anyway now that theyll have two carriers anytime (counting the one that can't go in the water) i was thinking it would be fun to brainstorm how this will enable their "blue force projection" which is navy jargon for driving your ship far away from port as opposed to "literal" warfare which is when you operate a bunch of fan boats and have to see the shore to navigate (looking at you isreal)(no offense) and thus can only figure out where you are when your second mate goes "literally that is the cape horn." (if you're wondering if i have a second mate, the answer is yes, pun intended)

so anyway as we all know there is a lot of disputed territory in that area and all of those asian dudes are trying to claim they own it (trump would just take it but that's another story for another day) and i'm wondering if this means china may actually use force soon (2040). TYPICALLY obama "criticized" the move which is basically him acknowledging that the last time he tried to talk to military men he went and created ISIS, and china probably knows that even though our generals are exremely competent they have been ordered to come up with battle plans on "global warming" ("don't get me started") and stuff like that so then who would step in to stop china ?

seems like england would have been an option but they're navy fleet is now just a couple of cargo ships filled with harriers. france is france and italy is italy and brazil sucks. that leaves germany, i guess, but all they do these days is put like 44 oxygen sensors on everything they build. What do YOU think?