QTDDTOT
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
QUESTIONS THAT DON'T DESERVE THEIR OWN THREADS!
Got to fingerfuck an FMK 9mm Gen 2, kind of liked it. It was 350 for it and two mags. I don't see a lot of Glocks come through but I liked the grip profile better.
Anyone have any opinions on them, aside from MUH AMERICA. It thankfully isn't covered in the bill of rights.
>>28368471
>giving money to commiefornia
you deserve to have your guns confiscated
>>28368471
Great! More craptastic tupperware.
>>28368471
An officer mistakes you for a black youth. How do you prevent him from fatally shooting you for your own protection?
If a family member owns a stripped lower and I buy a 'pistol-length' upper, can it be shipped to the same residence or does it fall under constructive intent? The deal is a parts kit with a 14.5" barrel, and I want to pin and weld a new muzzle device for my own build. Would someone get upset if it ships to same house?
>>28368523
I've never heard of there being any issues with it.
Unless there are any cases of it being an issue, I'd say just do it and not worry about it.
Can anyone explain to me that why did the developer made only a 20-round magazine and not a 30?
Also, why is it no one uses a rifle such as this today since it seems to have been very useful infantry rifle.
>>28368564
Probably because it would have to start curving, as it's feeding rimmed rounds.
Also no one uses a rifle like that because it's too high a caliber for an average infantryman. The gun itself was also insanely heavy. People gave it glowing reviews at the time because it was the closest thing the Allies had to a modern style assault or battle rifle.
People are trying to revive it again, but even with all that polymer it's still heavy, and it's still expensive.
>>28368507
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8
>>28368590
>rimmed rounds
>30-06
U wot m8?
>>28368590
>People are trying to revive it again, but even with all that polymer it's still heavy, and it's still expensive.
In your opinion wouldn't make some sense to add a few of high caliber rifles to a unit. Maybe 2 per platoon, perhaps?
Also, this gun looks some much like a BAR it's not even funny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGsFfkw1BdQ
>>28368564
hmmm there's the FNAR I suppose, just isn't in the super sexy 30-06
Also suspicious about not having a 30 round magazine.
>>28368648
> high caliber rifles to a unit
>2 per platoon
I'm fairly certain there are at least two dudes with a a rifle in a non intermediate cartridge per platoon
And stop saying "high caliber rifles". you sound like an idiot
>>28368631
Why the fuck did I think .30-06 was rimmed. What the fuck.
>>28368648
Possibly, but .30-06 isn't the most efficient when it comes to recoil management when compared to 7.62x51. Most rifle platoons consist of 42 men, and they are already equipped with similar rifles. They don't have automatic fire capability, because if you need a round that big you're probably reaching out for precision.
That and there's a pretty good chance the automatic riflemen are using the same round in a machine-gun more suited for high volumes of fire.
How bad could it go for me if i buy a milsurp gun online rather than a gun show or a local shop?
Will CETME sporters or the DSA FAL SA 58 reliably feed hunting rifle rounds or hollow points?
>>28368792
As long as it's from a reputable dealer: not bad at all.
Do I CZ75 Compact or Glock 19
Recently bought a sling for my supernova. Is that ring in the center of the sling for a flashlight?
>>28368471
Its a gun, its cheaper than a glock and does glock things.
What is the best self defense round in .38? No +P
>>28369596
>2" diameter ring handle that you can use to comfortably take the weight off your shoulder
hook a thumb through there i guess
>>28369700
hydra shock
>>28368564
cause being prone keeps you alive
weight
>>28369700
Anything that says Gold Dot on it.
