So far I have mostly nuclear based systems in mind-one that uses an over-sized fusion bomb in with a yield of something like 1000-3000 megatons that's incorporated into a massive bunker buster style system, the idea being that it punches through rock deep into the earth and explodes to create a massive localized earthquake while simultaneously contaminating the groundwater, but also doesn't have quite as severe a surface effect as a traditional weapon, ie, you can move in easily and rebuild afterwards and have to worry less about fallout and shit.
How you'd get such a massive bunker buster deployed flummoxes me a bit-you'd need a massive, easy to shoot down rocket, or to chuck it down from space, which has its own shortcomings. Could a massive drilling machine perhaps be the best way to sneak it in? Maybe you could use it to hold a nation hostage by putting one under their city and then gently letting them know?
A shaped charge style nuke would be good for this, that focused the force to the sides instead of into a perfect sphere, but I don't know how that would work.
bumping this
>>28280817
What if we weaponize ants
>>28280817
A grenade that flings live wasps everywhere.
I've always had the idea about napam style bombing, but with bees.
>>28280817
A bot that makes a fake facebook profile of people's girlfriends and sends breakup letters. Cyberwarfare redefined.
>>28280817
Some sort of energy ray that tangles shoelaces.
guys guys
a ray gun that turns people into kittens
totally would be the greatest weapon ever made
>>28283284
You sick fuck
Anyone "weaponized" model rocket motors?
I imagine you could quite easily make a huey-style rocket pod. But what would be a worthwhile payload, besides silly things.
>>28280817
1000-3000 megatons.....
Anon..... that shit is big enough to irradiate most of the planet.
Thunderscreeches for low altitude harassment
This, firing duplex 5.56 and flechette 84mm
>>28283634
What is that glorious thing?
>>28280817
You have no concept of how destructive a MT class yield is, do you?
>>28283703
Swedish LADA NIVA. Combined AT recoilless rifle with 5.56mm spotter rifle.
>>28283722
a what?
>>28280817
>1000-3000 megatons
>largest nuclear weapon ever tested was 50 megatons
>it was about the size of a small bus
>tested in the Kola Peninsula
>broke windows in Norway and Finland
do you even understand how big a megaton is?
>>28283806
I might need a physicsfag to check it, but I think you could legitimatley blow up the moon with a 3000 megaton device.
Wheres oppenheimer when you need him....
>>28283932
You could likely do it with less if you drilled into the moon fairly deeply
its like a firecracker - hold it lit on your palm and it goes bang, singing the palm - hold it in your closed fist however and you'll have a bloody arm stump and bight of hand splattered across the room
>>28283703
XM1970
>>28283932
>Wheres oppenheimer
V&
>>28284060
That's too bad. I always liked him.
>>28284268
Is this going to be an informed thread now?
>>28283284
Calm down satan
>>28280817
>largest nuke was ~40 megatons
>big enough to fucking level 90% of downtown Paris
>thinks 1000-3000 megatons is feasible, possible, necessary, capable of being transported on even a fuckhuge rocket
>this nigga
>>28283982
Wow, what a great analogy. You should do some writing. That could be like a radio or movie line.
>>28280817
A weapon that fires super heated, magnetized plasma. It would act like a flamethrower that actively seeks out people.
>>28284638
How about an SEP (somebody else's problem) force field?
>>28286555
Most of the world already has that. They just go cry to America for help.
