>they claim to be warfare enthusiasts
>they don't play Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations
What's your excuse?
>>28050949
Hard drive died a few weeks back and my replacement hasn't gotten here yet.
>>28050949
I'm a truck enthusiast, I don't play Euro Truck Simulator 2.
Ran out of scenarios to play
Come back to me when it has multiplayer so we can have a massive /k/lusterfuck.
>>28050949
Because my scenario stands.
>>28050949
How to get the damn thing to work on Linux?
Really, really, really, really, really, really, really, confused. As in I can't finish the tutorials confused. Please help.
>>28051063
There is supposedly multiplayer, just never fucked around with it though.
>>28050949
I have it, can't seem to get the enemy to work right in the custom designed scenarios.
>>28052107
Really? I never saw any MP option in the menus.
>>28052204
Saw game play of it when googled. Try that, should work.
>>28050949
>implying some people dont grow out of video games
>implying people dont spend their money on more gun stuff instead of computer upgrades and vidya
People got butthurt after CMANO showing that the USN wasnt an I WIN button as they throught to be. Especially against the Chinese PLAN.
>>28052495
You're assuming CMANO has all the correct data and items for everything.
>>28052495
>the scenario
>it is erect
>>28052495
because
Because it's like $40 at 50% off.
>>28052495
「MY SCENARIO」
>>28052495
>lol lets kamikaze a Virginia SSN into a destroyer formation
>hurr F-18 pilots can't read and suffer narcolepsy
>muh missiles hit because CIWS is run by chromosomes
>PLAN orbital assets nuke USN gay rowboat
Excellence in action.
What's a realistic surface/AA warfare loadout for Arleigh Burkes and Ticonderoga cruisers for a near future scenario (~2018)?
As much as I want to have them all have SM-6s that probably isn't very realistic, but the default loadouts leave like half of the VLS cells empty.
>>28053534
>but the default loadouts leave like half of the VLS cells empty.
That's realistic. That's how they're out today. We don't have enough missiles to fill them. In a war, they'd be filled, probably in the same proportion as before.
>>28053613
>by far most powerful navy in the world doesnt have enough missiles to fill the VLS cells of its surface combatants
thats kinda sad
Is this on Steam?
>>28053634
Think about it - each ship carries upwards of 100 missiles (IIRC), and each of those is several million dollars ($5 million for SM-6, $11 million for SM-3). Filling dozens of ships and maintaining all of those missiles, all while keeping adequate stockpiles of replacements is going to be expensive. For peacetime, it's more than enough, and if they ever go to war you'll see them filled back up.
>>28053634
We have a lot of ships, and don't build enough missiles to fill them all at once and keep using them over the years. Munitions usage is the biggest problem the USN would face in a real war. You have to use the high end munitions in order to enable strikes by low end munitions, such as simple iron bombs. That is how you can make the most of the limited quantity of munitions available.
>>28053650
Yeah, you just missed a 50% off sale.$80 normal price.
If you wait until Christmas it'll probably be 50% off again.
Real weapons grade spergs play John Tiller games.
My computer would melt if I tried to run it
>yes I'm a poorfag
I like reading summaries of the scenarios.
>
>>28050949
Is there anything like this for ground combat?
>>28053870
TacOps maybe? Judging by the steam page it seems like Command has land units as well.
>>28050949
Can it do WWII?
>>28053679
LOL @ 80 bucks.
>>28053937
TacOps is rather old at this point. Still fun.
Command's land units a shit.
>>28053944
Parts of it. They actually added in a bunch of Japanese stuff for someone who made a Final Countdown scenario, and a lot of the stuff is in the game because the equipment was used for long after WW2.
>>28050949
I play Jane's Fleet Command because I'm a poorfag ;_;
I played Indian Ocean Brawl for 24 hours straight once. A few hours in and you start to get major tetris effect.
>>28050949
>>28050949
Shit costs money and I don't have it right now
>>28054005
Does it handle turret and director arcs, things like that?
Can you cross a T and have it mean something?
>>28054422
Yes.
