https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6ro3Yrr3Kohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d48LH

File: 14436430046460.png (362KB, 650x836px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

362KB, 650x836px

>>27919006
>Using platform for cruise missiles to launch cruise misses
Oi vei!

File: su-34 (7).jpg (570KB, 1400x933px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

570KB, 1400x933px

>>27919124
>Dat ass

File: su-34 (9).jpg (428KB, 1023x680px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

428KB, 1023x680px

>>27919147

File: 0_ebb7f_694b5afb_orig.jpg (646KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

646KB, 1024x683px

>>27919124
i thought they only use the Tu-95 for spy stuff

>>27919006
>Hell March on K radio when the video starts.

>followed by God save the Tsar.

>Those cold shivers in the back when thinking about how much Russia is pissed off now they have proofs that IS took down their plane.

In the name of the french people thank you Russia for the bombs.

File: Sukhoi_Su-27SKM.jpg (8KB, 300x199px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

8KB, 300x199px

>>27919006

I like how all Russian fighters have massive dicks for no reason.

File: shrug.jpg (23KB, 500x310px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

23KB, 500x310px

>>27919006

When this war started, I asked if there was a chance that Tu-95's could get involved and everybody said that I was retarded for even thinking that it was a possibility.

File: tu-142 (2).jpg (714KB, 1300x880px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

714KB, 1300x880px

>>27919177
You are thinking of Tu-142.

>>27919006
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6gpFcrZlPs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVlj8DI5Lno

>>27919236
nice

File: pak fa (18).jpg (165KB, 1500x1013px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

165KB, 1500x1013px

>>27919202
>for no reason
There's plenty of reasons for such a layout varying from the tail adding some spare volume for radar, EW and additional fuel to spaced engines being good for some aerodynamic reasons I don't really care enough to dig out.

>>27919293

So is the US just behind the curve? None of our planes of dicks.

File: 137d29f1d5e33479b4a7b2f1357cebe8.png (420KB, 600x506px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

420KB, 600x506px

>>27919307
because US planes are female

File: f-14a (1).jpg (909KB, 2100x1364px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

909KB, 2100x1364px

>>27919307
The same idea is behind F-14 airframe, at least aerodynamic wise.

File: su32-2.jpg (169KB, 600x232px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

169KB, 600x232px

On russian planes the 'dick' often contains a parachute.

>>27919375

Damn, that's gotta hurt.

File: 0222.jpg (66KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

66KB, 900x600px

>>27919375
>>27919388
That too, but it is not its main purpose. The parachute can be fitted to an aircraft without the huge dick between spaced engines. This stuff can't.
>The aircraft has a distinctive large "sting" in the rear which contains the NO-14 radiolocation system, a radioelectronic countermeasures system, and a fuel tank. The NIIP NO-12 rearward radar that monitors enemy fighter activity behind the aircraft, and as needed, direct R-73 short-range and R-77 medium-range AAMs at the targets.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/su-34.htm

>>27919006
>laser guidance ? Nyet, bomb is fine

File: Fixing_KAB-500S_guided_bombs_to_a_Sukhoi_Su-34_at_Latakia_(1).jpg (339KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

339KB, 900x600px

>>27919440
Ahem.

>>27919006

i like how they don't even bother removing the tail guns like our B-52s