Who would win if these two sides went to war with conventional weapons only (no nukes)?
>>62276580
Why do you ask?
Blue
those questions are fucking pointless if America is included
>>62276580
>send pacifist POO IN LOOs as cannon fodder to distract chinks and ruskies.
>bomb chink and ruskie industry and factories
>win war
FRANGLOSPHERE
>>62276701
if india was red then the numerical advantage would be laughable
>>62276580
russia + china would be invencible in a convencional war, desu.
also:
>win a war with frogs and spaghettis like allies.
lmao
>>62276857
>WE WUZ CONKWEESTADORES N SHIT
>>62276580
>if just this were the ww2 scenario
>>62276580
>Brazil allied to the US going to war against Argentina
no just no
Russia and China are so big to conquer both would be near impossible desu
neither of them have the naval strength to reach America so it would probably become a stalemate
>>62276580
>Who would win
The Hispanosphere.
Ah, excellent, let's take our rightful clay.
The Blue team also has the only three true blue-water navies and again has far superior naval dominance generally.
It also has 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10, 11,13 ,as opposed to 2, 4, 12, 15 in terms of economy.
The Blue team has the 7 of the top 10 strongest militaries and the U.S. which is about two tiers above everyone else.
Pretty clear isn't it.
US would occupy European Russia before Putin even gets his pants up, eventually leading to a collapse of the Russian State.
China's fleet gets destroyed and navally blockaded.
Germany? hahaha
>>62276580
Pretty confident no one would.
US and UK would find a way to jew everyone and end up on top though.
>>62277366
If US could defeat Russia there would be no Russia
>>62277366
>US would occupy European Russia before Putin even gets his pants up
You are retarded.
Tell me how many forces we even have in Europe.
>>62277480
The U.S. can't do anything because of nukes but in scenario there are no nukes.
>>62277537
60 000
>mark balkans blue
blue wins
>mark balkans red
red wins
>>62277028
why?
>>62276857
>russia + china would be invencible in a convencional war, desu.
>what is chink navy
Dont even get me started on both of their air forces. It would be us invading them
>>62281794
>This
Aerial battles are keys in winning modern wars, if you do not control your own airspace, you're fucked. That means you can only supply by ground and you're bound to get fucked and sabotaged by airborne missions.
Blue wins as of now. Ask the same question 10 years later and the answer will be red.
What about this? No nukes
>>62277480
>what is a nuclear deterrent
>>62282114
Blue
>>62282114
China would win, JSDF can't do shit without big daddy US.
>>62282114
Blue
>>62282114
Blue
China is willing to do what America was not in Vietnam, India is shit, Japan can't take on China by itself
>>62282114
mongolia
>>62282210
>>62282211
>>62282234
>>62282247
>>62282262
I'm not sure they can stop all of them, remember, China is shit at wars
>>62276580
why not include the saudis
>>62277028
Far more likely to happen than we going AGAINST the United States.
>>62282486
>remember, China is shit at wars
When your enemies are shit, you don't have to be great
>>62282114
>mongols, Japs, Viets
Blues are fucked
>>62282247
You underestimate how much Vietnam hates China
>>62276580
The premise of the map is pointless and ludicrous. The USA alone could take on the other side.
>>62282723
>>62281607
Argentina and Brazil have been friends for over 100 years. We cooperate on countless things together. In fact, I don't think there is a closer relationship in Latin America.
>Today, the strategic relationship between Argentina and Brazil is considered to be "at the highest point in history".[4] Argentine foreign policy has given special emphasis in "deepening the strategic alliance with Brazil in all its aspects".[5] Likewise, Argentina has been "an absolute priority" for Brazilian foreign policy.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina%E2%80%93Brazil_relations
>>62282114
India and Nepal have Gurkhas.
