[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Hmm... Really makes you think.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /int/ - International

Thread replies: 45
Thread images: 10
File: 1468506177397.jpg (61 KB, 468x898) Image search: [Google]
1468506177397.jpg
61 KB, 468x898
Hmm... Really makes you think.
>>
i want to mouthfuck a small australian shitposter just to see how it feels
>>
Why is the modern one so much better?
>>
People have gotten smarter (at least in the developed World) so they can appreciate more abstract concepts of art, the only downside is the pretentious crowd that comes along with it.
I love going to that art gallery in my city, I just don't tell people that I go to it.
>>
>>62077005
id swallow just for you bby ;^)
>>
>>62077099
Art should be something to be appreciated, something pleasurable to look at.

This modern art shit is just ridiculous and only those pretentious fucks say it's art
>>
>>62077319
Oh I won't say that some of it's awful, but I think plenty of it is worth looking at.
Being on the internet you usually end up seeing the worst of the worst, but I encourage you to go to a nearby art gallery or exhibition when you have a chance, museums usually have different displays that offer traditional and modern art so even if you don't like the modern stuff you can still enjoy yourself.
Last week there was a large art sale in one of our trendy areas, and a lot of it looked really nice and was a mix between modern and traditional art. I thought about buying some but I'm a poorfag and was only there for a haricut, but it was worth looking around and seeing it all.
>>
>>62077514
>Oh I won't say that some of it's awful
Sorry, meant that I won't deny some of it is awful.
>>
>>62076975
I think that is nitpicking
>>
>>62077650
Are you really bolivian?
>>
>>62077589
Where I live there's not a single art gallery, so I really don't have a chance.

I thought you meant that all of it is good, like in OP, but glad to see sane people
>>
>>62077319
>>62076975

You don't have to look at it if you don't like it.
>>
>>62076975
finally, a facebook meme i can get behind!
>>
>>62077681
Yes, and so are you.
>>
>>62077713
Finally a non-country in my thread!
>>
>>62077099
>I just don't tell people that I go to it.
but you literally just did... and clearly just knowing gives you some sort of sense of superiority
>>
>>62077739
is this what qualifies as aussie bant is these days?

pretty poor tbqh
>>
File: 1420555097110s.jpg (3 KB, 123x125) Image search: [Google]
1420555097110s.jpg
3 KB, 123x125
>>62077700
>cucks who say you cannot have a negative opinion about art

If you don't have anything intersting to say you can always shut your mouth ?
>>
>>62076975
So modern artists should just make group portraits? We have cameras for that now.
>>
>>62077700
I don't look at it, I'm talking about people who say it's as good as "traditional" art

>>62077750
>what is anon
>>
>>62077802
Nice meme dude!
>>
>>62077857
cheer love ;)
>>
>>62077099
This, also we have cameras now so photorealism isn't such a big deal anymore

Btw a lot of those "photorealistic" paintings were made using photoshop tier tricks like camera obscura
>>
>>62077950
I have read there are some theories about it but not a real evidence of its use.
>>
>>62077950
Paintings aren't supposed to be photorealistic, and that's why every artist have it's own approach to artistic style
>>
>>62078098
Yeah, but a good chunck of classic artists tried to be as realistic as possible.
>>
File: foto_oleg-dou-1.jpg (83 KB, 817x1024) Image search: [Google]
foto_oleg-dou-1.jpg
83 KB, 817x1024
who cares
art have no future, nothing new, no way to progress, just speculation, shit and clean dirty money
>>
>>62078185
True, and the most successful ones were the ones who did something more other than just trying to imitate reality
>>
File: you plonker.jpg (42 KB, 615x410) Image search: [Google]
you plonker.jpg
42 KB, 615x410
>>62076975
>Wanting humanity to do nothing but romanticist paintings and sculptures of naked people for the rest of time
>>
File: tmp_207814605946348761837221736.jpg (136 KB, 546x700) Image search: [Google]
tmp_207814605946348761837221736.jpg
136 KB, 546x700
>>62076975
Yea yea, totally degenerate right! Haha, modern society is degenerate
>>
>>62077750
I'm anonymous here so I don't give a shit who I tell about myself.
>>
>>62076975
abstract/minimal art isnt shit. not the method is the problem but just the modern artists. they, mostly whites, are trash and scamming
>>
>>62079219
This, most of the art that you see being mocked online is stiff that isn't made for artistic purpose, it's made with shock value so the "artist" can have their name said.
>>
File: art.jpg (348 KB, 469x1237) Image search: [Google]
art.jpg
348 KB, 469x1237
>>62076975
>>
WTF I hate art now
>>
>>62076975
I could understand that abstract art requires an open mind but some of it is way to out there, I think I remember seeing some Vice article or something about an artist who dookied on a canvas or vomit, honestly I can't remember but it was something really wierd/kinda gross.
>>
File: iQBhxcV.jpg (334 KB, 1924x1860) Image search: [Google]
iQBhxcV.jpg
334 KB, 1924x1860
>>62079596
?
>>
>>62079994
>open mind
artists shit
>>
Someone please convince me that this should be considered art: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7V1zzrq3kU
>>
>>62078545
I do.
>>
>>62078716
Nice meme, faggot.
>>
>>62080668
well, modern artists are unironcally and unmemely corrupted and degenerate. thats the answer. theres no other one than it.

contemporary art, especially conceptual art, has always been nothing but pretentious and pointless. but recently its been as bad as it gets.
>>
File: 1451193612461.png (203 KB, 720x562) Image search: [Google]
1451193612461.png
203 KB, 720x562
>>
File: images.jpg (9 KB, 259x195) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
9 KB, 259x195
>>62077737
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH

>>62077831
>So modern artists should just make group portraits?
yes
fuck your cameras
>>
>>62076975
Abstract art was good with Jackson Pollock then people push the shit too far
Thread replies: 45
Thread images: 10

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.