Would you consider pic related white?
>we wuz khans and shit
Stop making up shit about your heritage finland, you're white.
no
blonde mongol
this is white.
>>61844963
What I think is irrelevant.
>>61844963
How about this?
>>61845300
You can clearly see the influence of OP's pic on the average Finnish man
>>61845340
I don't travel to the north that often.
>>61845374
>north
>>61845892
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arKxCiTZoyQ
peace be upon them even if you/we didn't attend it
>>61846045
>>61844963
Almost all Turks converted to the Great Arab Desert religion. When will you convert?
>>61845892
Someone catalogued all those "races" and didn't thought that they might be in fact ethnicities and more culturally constructed than genetically defined ?
>>61847773
Stop acting french asshole! this is literally your proto-commies reasoning who destroyed our own country.
>>61846988
there is no arab you sandnigger
>>61847773
t. Nigger
>>61847933
>>61847980
But that whole website is racialist gibberish
Its sources were white nationalists forums, and very few to no actual anthropologists
Ethnicities are part geographical, part genetic but socially constructed to a very high degree.
what
>>61844963
No, only American and British pale skinned people are white.
>>61848074
Note that I said racialist, not racist. The website looked ok in itself, but using it to cut clear lines between different of breeds of human is pretty dumb.
Humans are not breeds of dogs.
"White" is just a skin color and not a real racial classification, but to answer your question, the person in your image has obvious non-Caucasian admixture.
>>61848074
>White Nationalists
I don't think that I better than others, I just don't want brown people in my country.
>>61848357
Well that's understandable, of a sort, unfortunately you share Germany with people of a different opinion
Also, I don't think violent confrontation will end up in a better situation
>>61848167
yeah they are subspecies.
breeds of dogs are not natural but selected breeding with artificial selections, humans subspecies appears because of natural selection.
also the sources come from old anthropologists who were real scientists who teached at universities, for exemple Carleton Coon was an expert about north africa, it's just the modern commie propaganda of school who tryhard to make this people dumb because "nazis'n sheit", you are just repeating the vision of anthropology according to (((Franz Boaz))) AKA the commie version of school.
why you are so naive seriously? modern scientists are constantly implying they are different subspecies (groups of people) with politically correct words but never said "race" because they are afraid of SJW reactions.
>>61844963
Undoubtedly.
>>61848458
>Violence
I don't want violence, they migrated here once and can remigrate back.
>>61844963
I have always wanted to ask this from the experts so here I go:
The popular American singer Spooky Black HAS TO HAVE Finnish ancestry based on this video, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nZfHt5G6UQ
He looks like a Finn if I've ever seen one. Opinions?
>>61848510
But in that case they will remigrate to violence.
>>61848485
>>61848485
Subspieces ? There can be more differences between a two Caucasian then between a black dude and a white one, and even more differences between two French than between a French and another white, a German from example.
The human biodiversity is really low, and the most diverse continent is Africa. Those small percentages do explain a lot of external and even internal differences in general (our appearances, diseases, and so on...) but keep in mind that a white dude might be more distant to you, genetically speaking, than a black one.
What you're looking for are ethnicities. French, German, Algerian, Finn is being defined as much by external appearances as by our geography, our traditions, languages, way of life, our enemies even.
Sources :
http://www.rationalwiki.org/wiki/Racialism
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Human_Phenotypes
https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/10m8st/from_a_genetic_perspective_are_human_races/
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1526pr/eli5_is_a_race_to_a_human_like_a_breed_is_to_a_dog/
But since you used Jewish parenthesis you probably won't like my sources :(
>>61848992
Stop trying to fight against biology dude, it's the same for animals.
also
>There can be more differences between a two Caucasian then between a black dude and a white one, and even more differences between two French than between a French and another white, a German from example.
no sorry you don't even really believe that this is just bad faith, Caucasoid types are more close between them than Negroids or Mongoloids types.
you are actually just repeating the political correctness speech of modern scientists who exactly mean what i am implying, you talk about biology but you don't even know what a subspecie is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subspecies
Homo Sapiens have exactly the same biological rules than others animals you know? you remember some youtuber retards who teach SJW stuff but don't even know what the fuck was a goy before watching a movie about jews.
and i answer you, you are totally brainwashed by the Franz boas point of view in anthropology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas
be less naive please.
>>61849795
Did you even read my sources, or should I said (((sources))) ?
>”The rejection of the race concept by most anthropologists beginning most recently in the 1960s, was based on the genetic evidence... Conformity to political correctness was not the cause of these changes.[2]
[2] : Daniel E. Lieberman, in 2003
On "Lewotin's fallacy", which consists in dividing the human race in small sets like pic in OP :
>The taxonomic division of the human species into races places a completely disproportionate emphasis on a very small fraction of the total of human diversity. That scientists as well as nonscientists nevertheless continue to emphasize these genetically minor differences and find new “scientific” justifications for doing so is an indication of the power of socioeconomically based ideology over the supposed objectivity of knowledge.
On racial differences in general
>Modern genetic[34][35][36][37][38][39] and craniometric[40] data has demonstrated the vast majority of variation >85% is found within populations, rather than between them <15%. Of the latter, 10%, or less, is found between large continental groups of ethnic groups/demes (e.g. "Caucasoid", "Negroid", and "Mongoloid" of outdated anthropology). Interpopulation variation is mostly continuous, and the arbitrary categorization of humans into races is therefore neither useful nor an accurate method in analyzing biological variation. Instead modern biologists and physical anthropologists tend to study clines.
>85% is found within populations, rather than between them
>Homo Sapiens have exactly the same biological rules than others animals you know?
Homo Sapiens is the only species that colonised the whole world and sedentary on different climates. There is the origin of human races. We are not an animal like any other. No animals identify to a country, a religion, a tradition. These identifications are what created the Finnic, Central European et al. identities.
>>61848593
lol i saw this shit once and i thought that motherfucker is a finn :DDD or slavetislav
Mika Hakkinen tier
So not really
the mongol blood is strong on this pic
>>61848593
He really does look Finnish :DDDDDDDD
Could be just fetal alcohol syndrome though desu :_---DDD
>>61844963
Looks like one of the Russian types so yes.
>>61850180
Thank you anon, I've been saying this for years as a microbiologist
>haha but "race = social construct" is just a meme!
Said no educated person ever
>>61850180
>Homo Sapiens is the only species that colonised the whole world and sedentary on different climates. There is the origin of human races.
Exactly like other animals species, it's literally with this way that you create subspecies from natural selection, there are also hybridation with other human species.
the thing is there a huge confusion between "race' according to farm selection on wild species for creating domestic species and "race" used on humans who is just an old word for "subspecie".
your greentexts are again, reformed PC stuff for making human beings special snowflakes but actually that mean the same thing, on a PC way, you are also confusing "species" and "races", also the term "caucasoid" "negroid" and "mongoloid" are outdated by western modern science only for political reasons.
>>61851012
>Said no educated person ever
>educated person
yeah educated persons according to leftists point of views.
people like you are very dangerous, you don't even realize that your relativism of massive bad faith and negating evidences can destroy societies.
>>61851012
>>61850180
Aren’t all concepts social constructs? I don't get this meme.
>>61851503
You revoke everything I say as "leftist/PC propaganda". Yet, a respected biologist explicated said that this was not propaganda but scientific progress.
The human "races" are not subspecies because of internal variations vastly outnumbering exteriors ones.
>>61851546
It simply means that being there is not a white race that exists independently of our history. The idea of "Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid" exists because of historical interactions between these groups.
>>61851752
>The idea of "Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid" exists because of historical interactions between these groups
This in no way invalidates the concept of race.
>>61851546
it's marxist bullshit
>>61851752
I don't revoke anything, but it's the truth, you have totally the vision of Franz Boas, here for more informations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas#Cultural_anthropology this guy was a jew and a leftist.
>The human "races" are not subspecies because of internal variations vastly outnumbering exteriors ones.
even the animals subspecies have internal variations between their differents subgroups of populations.
your arguments are typical relativist deconstruction for totally remove the idea of subspecies but actually meaning the same thing on a different way.
>The idea of "Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid" exists because of historical interactions between these groups
No, there are analysis and studies of skeletons and skulls, but well you are implying everyones was dumb and retards before 1945 strangely.
je crois que je vais devoir te répondre plus à l'aise en français si ça continue.
>>61852012
And ??
Him being a jew doesn't make it any less recievable as an opinion, especially since it has been peer-reviewed.
Je dois dormir déso. On est (((loin))) d'être d'accord mais au moins c'était un dialogue de sourds polis.
>>61852233
Parce que le problème c'est qu'après 1945 tous le monde s'est mis à adopter les idées de cet homme soudainement, à partir des années 60 environ, pourquoi? pas parce que c'est révolutionnaire son truc mais pour des raisons politiques, à cause de la seconde guerre mondiale, ensuite je ne dis que c'est un méchant juif avec des griffes et des yeux rouges mais on va pas se mentir, les juifs surtout de cet époque et européen ont une énorme tendance au communisme et a l'extreme gauche.
ensuite mon gars franchement c'est pas dur à comprendre, t'a une espèce, cette espèce se répand dans plusieurs coins de la planète, donc elle évolue différemment et possède donc plusieurs sous-espèces qu'on peut qualifier de races (et pas au sens races domestiques comme les chiens) mais fait toujours partie de la meme espèce parce c'est vrai qu'au niveau moléculaire c'est pas grand chose la différence, mais pour te donner une idée on a peine 2% de différence avec le Chimpanzé, donc au niveau des chiffres c'est peu mais y'a quand une gigantesque différence si tu change à peine 0,1%, qu'il y ait aussi des différences à l'intérieur des sous-espèces ça change pas grand chose hein vu que le résultat final nous mène a un etre unique c'est à dire toi, et c'est la meme chose pour n'importe quel animal, ensuite c'est pas parce qu'on fait partie de la meme espèce qu'on doit rentrer dans le délire qu'on est tous frère et je sais pas quoi, ça c'est une utopie complètement délirante qui ne fait que générer des problèmes, ensuite la race n'est pas une construction sociale, c'est un fait, t'a pas besoin d'etre généticien tu t'en rend compte en regardant simplement, d'ailleurs les anciens anthropologues racialistes c'était des mecs très expérimentés ayant fait des études et enseignant à l'université, le truc c'est qu'à l'école on nous dit que tous ça magiquement c'est rien que des conneries et que c'est nazi blablabla.
>>61844963
white or not, that average finn face isnt bad. this guy looks like a guy who loves fun things and is good at joking.
>>61852774
autre chose, c'est quoi ce délire pacifiste ou tu veux le bien pour toute l'humanité entière? ça ne marche pas comme ça, tu es un etre unique c'est à dire toi, donc tu marche principalement par t'es propres interets, quand tu fais partie d'un peuple, d'un pays, d'une nation c'est la meme chose, tu lutte POUR TON CAMP! pour t'es intérets à toi, l'adversité t'en a mais alors strictement rien à branler si ils sont plus légitime ou pas, tu lutte pour toi.
c'est ça le problème de nos jours dans les sociétés occidentales, les gens pensent au camp d'en face plutot que de penser à leur camps à eux, surtout quand le camp d'en face ne le mérite pas, on leur a mit une espèce d'utopie universaliste dans la tete ou faut comprendre les problèmes de tous le monde en mode bisounours alors que ça ne marche pas et que ça n'a jamais marcher comme ça.
et les scientifiques en réalité quand ils te parlent d'ethnie et de groupes de peuples, en vrai ils sont juste en train de te dire que les sous-espèces, ils s'arrangent juste pour utiliser des termes vagues ou politiquement correct, ou alors plutot que te parler de la sous-espèce entière te parlent d'une sous-catégorie taxonomique à l'intérieur meme ( donc les ethnies) en insistant bien qu'on est tous humain blablabla, certains d'ailleurs finissent par oublier que c'est de la pression politique et finissent par y croire, surtout ils sont de gauche.
sois moins naif et lit entre les lignes la prochaine fois.
