https://www.politicalcompass.org/
If you're not in this general area you're a faggot with no friends edition
me on the right
>using that fucking awful biased piece of shit """"""""""""""""""""""""""compass""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Also, >>>/pol/
>>61740262
this graph is dumb and why aren't you ecological please fuck off from my thread thank you
>>61740299
If you think the test you linked in the OP is ANYTHING other than leftist propaganda, you're retarded. You end up in the bottom left 95% of the time unless you put in edgy answers about wanting to kill people in china. It's pure propaganda to make uneducated people think they're "left wing" when in reality they're on an incredibly skewed scale.
>>61740368
and yet weirdly enough whenever it's posted on 4chan most people end up in blue or purple
>>61740406
Yes, massive edgelords. According to that shithouse test I'm a lefty, and closest aligned with the NZ green party, which is demonstrably bullshit considering I agree with fuck all of their policies.
>>61740431
fuck then link me to that one you took
>>61740464
http://politicaltest.net/
It also gives a better depth in terms of specifics.
Libertarian socialism is the only way
>>61740262
I'm a Democratic National Liberal on that one as well.
>>61740262
>being proud of being a standard neoliberal
>>61740493
That doesn't make sense, socialism you want big government and libertarian you want small government
>>61740585
It does make sense. Freedom and capitalism are incompatible. A true libertarian must be against wage slavery.
>>61740633
>What kind of government size you want
Just fuck my shit up
>>61740473
To be fair it didn't ask very many questions about the environment and the ones it asked were pretty extreme, so still not 100% accurate
so it's one of these threads eh? I came preped this time
>>61741086
holy shit this is either bait or you're a massive faggot
>>61741117
you're on 4chan, what do you think m8
>>61740238
Do you like my graph, /int/?
enjoy the free helicopter ride
>>61740238
t. transgender
>>61741281
meant for
>>61741176
>>61741281
>>61741309
I wanted to get center-right because I'm center-right myself, but it wouldn't let me.
>>61740238
i'm not into politics
is this good or should i hang myself
>>61741343
>>61741376
absolute fucking rand-tier retard nerds lmao
>>61740697
Yeah I think it could be longer but I prefer the metrics they use. The anthro/eco one seems most skewed, I think I'm anthro only because I support animal testing
Also what the fuck are you doing on the left of the commie scale literally kys
>>61741391
Get that purple one over to the right and you're all good.
>>61741408
because regulation of businesses is a good thing and anybody who thinks they have your best interest in mind is impressively naive
i don't support literal communism the graph just shows I'm not some FREER THE MARKET FREER THE PEOPLE type retard
>>61741398
>rand
>>61740238
>>61741435
...ayn rand
you know, the person whose book kids read in high school and suddenly feel more enlightened than their dumb peers who only party and listen to rap music
>>61740238
I do this one every once in a while and update it.
>>61740262
wouldve expected myself to be more eco friendly, apparently not
>>61741086
yall motherfuckers need a hobby mayne
>>61741432
Maybe in your shitty country, businesses are run by people and people care about people. Regulations do nothing but slow shit the fuck down and prevent anyone from innovating or being the best they can be.
t. someone who runs a business
>>61741578
Classic, I remember being a lefty when I was 15 too. I told my dad, he looked at me for a few seconds and said "you'll change". I laugh at how true that was.
>>61741604
As I said before I think the eco scale on that site is a bit fucked, the rest seems right.
>>61741391
>National socialist
pretty good man
>>61741578
damn you're regressing fast, what happened my man?
>>61740585
No, socialism wants the people, and by extension you'd need a fair government first, to seize the means of production. If you are of the opinion that corporations limit rights as much as the government, then yeah, you can still be vaguely a libertarian socialist.
>>61741620
>businesses are run by people and people care about people.
we're not talking about small businesses though are we
most businesses have nothing but profit in mind, be real with me
>>61741625
It's called growing out of one's teenage years.
>>61741604
i do like 8 tests every 6 months. takes an hour or so. I don't mind and it's interesting to see how I change
>>61740585
Social libertarians believe in freedom and equality
>>61741647
No? I worked at an engineering firm with ~1000 staff, they do fuckloads to help. I'm not saying it's all magic and flowers, but less regulation is objectively good. Personally, I'd prefer stricter punishments on tax fraud than any form of protectionism, if you can find the people who skip taxes, they're likely to be the exact same people who run their businesses without putting people first. Shit like tariffs are objectively unjustifiable in a lot of circumstances. They choke the objective better supplier for shit like >muh jobs and >muh unions.
>>61741625
Known as "growing up"
>>61740262
>>61740496
>>61740697
>>61741391
>>61741581
>>61741604
>tfw a libyan is the most secular itt
>>61741578
What's wth that weird date format??? X?? III???
>>61740262
Is this good?
>>61741899
>communistic
>/r/thedonald
>>61741716
>actually, here's my experience, so you're wrong. businesses definitely have my personal best interest at heart!
whoa never thought anybody actually believed this 2bh
>>61741845
Tbh man there's no such thing as "good" or "bad" as long as
>your extremism value isn't too high
If you're extremist in anything chances are you're a retard
>you're not a commie
Fuck commies.
>>61740238
>>61741924
Trump is more commie than capitalist. A true capitalist would have no problems with NAFTA or TPP
im a boring person
>>61741951
Have you ever worked anywhere? The world isn't trying to kill you you know.
And besides, I said anyway that whether or not a business is shady is beside the point with regards to protectionism in trade.
>>61741974
What counts as a high value? Because my secular leanings make me look like a militant atheist but I'm just agnostic.
Also bizarre that it came up as anthropocentric because I'm pretty eco-friendly as a whole. The only thing I disagreed with was that apes should have the same rights as humans.
>>61741716
hi daniel
>>61742023
It says "84% are more extremist than you". If you're on the bad side of halfway you're an extremist.
>>61742012
yes, and everywhere I've worked stresses the importance of "customer service" insofar as it's good for business, like literally anywhere else you'd work
>>61742044
48% are more extremist than me and the most extreme shit I'd do is beat up a neo nazi or some shit
>>61741984
literally stalin tier
>>61742040
?
>>61742080
It is good for business. The capitalistic mindset is that a lot of what is good for business is also good for the community. This is obviously not 100% true, but it works in principle. Still, I don't see how protectionism has anything to do with this. It's objectively retarded. NZ has the best dairy products in the world, and we'd sure as fuck LIKE to send them to Europe at a cheap price, but we can't. Why? Because Europe doesn't want their farmers being cucked by our superior cheese. They'd rather force ours to be more expensive than force their own farmers to either a) improve their cheese so it sells or b) move onto something they're better at. Both of those are good options that improves everything for both us and Europe. Protectionism is dumb and commies are retarded for thinking it helps anyone.
I don't know if this is just one fuck but I'm noticing a lot of liberal sentiment from american flags all of a sudden
>>61742147
he was a tough and noble leader
>>61741376
>sane, rational and peaceful person
>right wing libertarian
Hmmmm.
>>61741770
It's so Ameridumb (I guess you count here as well) don't get confused over months (written here with Roman numerals) being in the second and not first place.
Mine says i'm a Nadsi. get on my level
>>61742253
The best one braisd jebsu
>>61742149
This
Protectionism is like giving a fat kid a piggy back ride in a race.
Unless its for an infant industry with tremendous potential, protectionism should not be used.
>>61741751
*tips*
>>61742239
date format is day/month/year everywhere except in the US ... I thought you genuinely wrote roman numerals on your format
>>61741581
>Arabs unironically more liberal than the rest of /int/
Now I've seen everything
>>61742330
I did - because months can be written with Roman numerals.
>>61742314
Yeah, the only other time I really support protectionism is when monopolies are concerned, because a monopoly goes against most positive benefits of capitalism and has too many of the negatives
WHO /NEOLIBERAL DEMOCRAT/ HERE
The last time I did OP's test, my result was a bit left and libertarian.
>>61742149
This is my point, they only circumstantially care about you. If their reputation is bad, they lose business. Businesses aren't benevolent, they're opportunistic. 100% benevolence is also bad for business, otherwise all businesses would be nonprofit and leaving as small of a carbon footprint as possible.
I never said I support protectionism btw
>>61742513
Yeah but is that a bad thing? It's still objectively better than being a commie
>>61742647
There's a really huge divide between being a commie and wanting reasonable but strict regulations on corporations
>tfw you're Ghandi
>>61740585
Socialism has no relationship whatsoever with the "size" (whatever that means) of government. Socialist thought was primarily anarchist for the majority of the 19th century, and even a good portion of the early 20th.
The idea that socialism means big government, or vice versa, is a unique and bizarre Americanism/Canadianism.
That's why you have a bunch of idiot liberals calling the military a "socialist programme" in the United States, or, conversely, why you have a bunch of right-wing types calling Obamacare socialist. Also why you have welfarists like Sanders calling themselves socialists.
>mfw Americans' biggest political argument is the size of the government
r8 me m8s
>>61743039
better than most
the nationalistic bit can't be helped I suppose, you're british
r8
Anything out of the purple means you are either retarded hypocrite SJW or an autocratic asshole.
>>61742930
This has always been the case in every country Pavel. Just in indirect ways.
Phone posting
>You are a liberal patriot. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 44 percent are more extremist than you.
32%
-20%
5%
-10%
26%
16%
38%
huh, I didn't i think I was so socalist
>>61742005
good lad
>>61743345
It doesn't even make sense. Governments don't go overboard with the number of ministries since they' have to allocate less money to each ministry that way.
>>61740238
Anything other than high purple is cancer tier
Anything else is shite.
>>61743889
Well you're still pretty balanced.
