>wake up
>britain still in EU
how do bongs feel about their referendum being ignored by their politicians?
well?
>>61710795
If, say in 3 or so years we are still in the EU then I will of course feel annoyed, but most people here are aware the process of leaving the EU is a lengthy one and so to answer your question: the referendum isn't being ignored but if article 50 isn't activated fairly soon people will start to get angry.
Happy, don't ask inbred chavs their opinion.
>>61710795
it takes AT LEAST 8 months for the whole process to take place you fucking stupid idiot
>>61715559
>stupid idiot
That's redundant you fat large man
you cant just leave over night anon
the EU has to suffer nice and slowly first
>>61715800
shut up gay faggot
>>61715910
I-I swear I don't like men's penises
>>61710795
>britain still in EU
well yes, doesn't article 50 require a 2 year transitional period?
>>61716110
liking traps is gayer than sucking dick
>>61710795
Very good 2bh. As part of the 52% I hope they just drag it on and on
>>61716144
after its been invoked, yes
it hasn't even been invoked yet
>>61716507
So why isn't it invoked yet?
>>61716507
>>61716144
No it allows for a transitional period between a couple of months and 2 years
>>61716672
Cameron quit before invoking it for some reason. The next pm (likely Theresa May) will trigger it.
>>61716752
guarantees a minimum of two years, after article 50 is invoked
>>61716672
None of the politicians want to invoke it since they know it'll be a disaster and they don't want the blame on their hands. Currently they're casting lots on who'll have to do it
>>61716507
You don't even have any proper leadership with enough political capital to do it anyways.
mfw brexit not happening
>>61716794
>3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.
>>61715800
Shut up, black nigger
>>61710795
>>61716939
I don't understand what you're trying to say
Article 50 gives a strict 2 year deadline from when withdrawal is notified to the EU until the actual withdrawal. During that, EU laws still apply to the UK. We continue to participate in *most* other EU stuff as normal. That's all after it's invoked though, we'er not even at that stage.
>>61715494
>most people here are aware the process of leaving the EU is a lengthy one
aka you're politicians have no clue what to do
>>61717283
>a strict 2 year deadline
Yes, a strict deadline of 2 years AT MAXIMUM, unless the European council unanimously agrees to extend it.
You can have the withdrawal agreement go into effect before the end of the 2 year period.
The 2 year period is a way to not have 10 year negotiations
>>61717461
>Yes, a strict deadline of 2 years AT MAXIMUM, unless the European council unanimously agrees to extend it.
If it was a maximum then it would be impossible to extend it...it's is a minimum, and if further time is needed it needs to be negotiated.
Either way two years seems to be the time frame given to work with after article 50
>>61717659
>If it was a maximum then it would be impossible to extend it...it's is a minimum
No, it's not. Can't you understand the quote from the Lisbon treaty article 50?
>from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2
The date where the withdrawal agreement goes into effect can be after 6 months or one year or whenever.
You have 2 years to figure everything out and maybe longer if the European council feels like negotiating longer.
The idea is that everything is resolved within 2 years and hopefully sooner.
