I really hate most New World/colonial place names. The only good ones are ones either accurately descriptive generic names (Grand Canyon) or Native American/Australian names (which have unique etymology worth preserving) like Chicago. Yes I know that under colonialism a lot of natives got displaced/eradicated but at least having a local native name means it won't be a copycat of another place
Otherwise, we get names like Springfield, London, Berlin, Paris, Lancaster plastered all over the place, all these shitty redneck towns stole names from other cities
Actually, "Lancaster" sounds pretty gay.
Actually, "Lancaster" may be pretty gay.
>>61183180
>wanting your country to have places called Woolloomooloo and Wagga Wagga
Anglo names are far superior, it's just that Americans are autistic and have an "x" for each state
>>61183412
>Anglo names are far superior
It's highly questionable.
>it's just that Americans are autistic and have an "x" for each state
Well, absolutely true. Even not English native people got it
>>61183412
Those sound unique and storied though. Maybe there is some cool folklore to go with it? Maybe it's the result of thousands of years of Abbo culture around the place, maybe there's some cheeky double entendre about it. But most importantly it's unique to that place and not confused with something else
>>61183667
A lot of euro places has the same name, tho.
Semenholes had the best name: Okefenokee, Okechobee, Econlockhatchee, Ichitucknee, Kissimmee etc.
btw fuck you massachusetts and your gayass whatever injun tribe place names which all suck
>>61183412
I'm from the woolloo bay area cunt have some respect
>>61183412
>coober pedy
>>61183180
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea,_Virginia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan,_Missouri
You can have less European like that tho
