Serious question
Is Argentina a first world country?
Yes. Because it's white.
Almost
Their women are first world desu tho, most attractive in South America. Second is Colombia
No.
Wat, of course not
If you need to ask, then no.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAJ
>>60938934
maybe
almost you can do it tina go tina
No, but it's hella cosy
>>60939014
hell yeah, it is
>>60938934
they have a gdp 1/3 of ours.
fuck no not welcome to the club.
>>60938934
No it's a pooe shtihole 3rd world brown and nigger spic craphole. Don't come please, in case you had that awful idea.
Better t
Los argentinos son coso
>mierdentina
INFORMED ANSWER
>Third World Country
Historical characterization for neutral countries during the Cold War. In this sense Argentina was a third world country.
>Developing Nation/Economy
According to the International Monetary Fund Argentina is defined as a developing economy due to its low GDP and its instable economy (see late 90s-early 00s depression). Like other Latin American countries there are also problems with corruption and expropriation which limit FDIs into Argentina.
>South America
>first world
>>60938934
Fuck no
Like most Latin American countries it suffers from the disease of socialism. Corruption and low economic liberty that slowly strangled the economy, people getting poorer due to the bad economy so they tax even more to pay for welfare to sustain the poor, which in turn strangles even more the economy. What happened to Latin America is what will happen to Spain, Greece, France and Italy unless the tendency changes drastically.
>>60939769
J-jorge?
When did you get so smart? When did this happen
>>60939769
>argentina
>socialism
Uhhh, what?
>>60939769
Don't make broad generalizations about the causes of economic collapses across the Latin world, especially to promote a political view.
In Argentina's case no socialist policies have ever been seen as the cause of its most recent collapse almost two decades ago. It was due to dollarization (peso pegging to the dollar), Carlos Menem's borrowing, and massive amounts of debt. Not necessarily socialism.
>>60939830
>>60940041
Argentina is on communist-tier of economic freedom. Hard to do business, low financial security, big bureaucracy, one of the highest tax burden on the world, state appropiating private enterprises, etc.
Yes, it's socialistic, you don't need to fly the red flag to be one, it's all about economic policies.
>>60940190
They weren't socialist though. Up until the Argentine Peso Crisis they were actually implementing austerity policies to lower the debt. They are corrupt, but corruption isn't inherently socialism. That doesn't mean that other countries haven't crashed under the failure of socialist policies. Argentina is just not one of those countries. Trust me.
>>60940354
>they were actually implementing austerity policies to lower the debt.
This means absolutely nothing when your average citizen can't create a business because of the tax burden or foreign investors don't invest in your country because of the high risk of your financial assets.
>>60940552
And let's not forget about the last expropriations of local and especially foreign companies that happened in Argentina and Latin America.
A foreign company goes to another country, creates a big company with their money that in turn generates wealth for all and creates jobs until a socialist quack rises to power and expropriates it.
What happens next? No Spanish or any other foreign company is ever going to invest in an Argentina, Venezuela or any other socialistic shithole ever again knowing that the local state can just steal their company in a blink. -->The economy gets even worse.
http://www.elmundo.es/america/2012/05/01/noticias/1335891038.html
>>60938934
honestly is like romania tier so no.
