Are lolis legal in your country?
lolicon is legal in the US yes
>>60636870
Is pic related accurate?
>>60636827
Which country can allow those degenerate things.
i hope no and never wont be
Yes
Finland is free country.
>>60636827
I have no idea. I have yet to find a clear yes/no answer to this question.
Illegal, but...
>>60636827
It's legal if the police don't find it
>>60636827
no cyber laws here unless you get caught supporting ISIS online
never saw a hentai magazine here 2bh
but im sure they exist
if you mean real life lolis no the age of consent is 18
>>60636827
Yes. Feels pretty good, man.
Though I still don't think I'd risk importing any loli mangoes / other merchandise here.
Yes.
No clue
>>60640870
>that newspaper
FORBYD LORTET
O
R
B
Y
D
L
O
R
T
E
T
>>60641626
pls translate.
>>60636827
Yes.
>>60641754
https://www.information.dk/indland/2010/08/klamt-vaere-forbudt
Here is the entire article, im going to translate it via google translate.
It's disgusting - but should it be banned?
A cartoon translator in Sweden just been convicted for possession of Japanese manga drawings of children in sexual situations. It is a verdict on an important part of Japanese culture, says Japan-connoisseurs. The case is now in the Supreme Court, and while a similar law is under way in Denmark, opens exhibition of animated child pornography in Brandts in Odense
A cartoon translator in Sweden just been convicted for possession of Japanese manga drawings of children in sexual situations. It is a verdict on an important part of Japanese culture, says Japan-connoisseurs. The case is now in the Supreme Court, and while a similar law is under way in Denmark, opens exhibition of animated child pornography in Brandts in Odense
As a Swedish translator of Japanese manga yesterday was sentenced for possessing child erotic drawings, a large Japanese culture will be subject to Swedish law. Japan Connoisseurs believe that the judgment reflects a culture clashes, and researchers and practitioners of pedophiles believe that the drawings may incite pedophile tendencies.
In Denmark, the Social Democrats a law on the road after the Swedish model. The images in mangahæfterne normally shows very young children in numerous sexual situations - very visual, very directly and according to the drawings often of great pleasure for both the child and the adult.
exhibited child pornography
Repulsive to most people, but tomorrow opens an exhibition of the character manga child pornography on the Brandts. Curator Christian Hviid Mortensen explains that the exhibition comes as a response to the Social Democrats' bill, and the ensuing public debate - in addition to the judgment of the Swedish translator.
>>60641922
- Why do you think that the exhibition is needed?
"Because the problem of the character of child pornography is a good example of the whole debate about how much power the media has on us - in other words, is it all just brainwashing? Watching a violent movie, you go out, and turns a lot of people to death afterwards? It is a bit the same basic argument we see around character child pornography. And if we ban one, should not we also prohibit the other? We want people to take a position on all these issues. "
- What do you say to the people who could feel offended by your exhibition?
"We are trying to manufacture the it as it is. If people feel offended by it, the course just speak up. It is also part of the exhibition, the audience can participate in the debate, both on the network but also in the showroom with a screen that you can write on, among other things. So I hope almost that people feel provoked enough to give their views. "
- Among others, the Association of Psychologists been out and warn that the sign child pornography can incite pedophile tendencies. How is your position on that?
"I do not know enough about to speak."
- But have I made you some thoughts about the responsibility I possibly have?
"Well then, but we force it is not in the minds of people. You can just walk away and do not look at it. However, there are important issues at stake. For example, manga culture is hugely popular in Japan, and we would like to ask the question: Are all Japanese people as pedophiles? Or is it because it is a cultural product that we just do not understand? In our culture can we sneer at it and think it's perverse, but it is in any case an important discussion to take. "
>>60641952
Submitted Information article from January this year, the researchers point to the deleterious effect the character of child pornography can have on potential violators, said Christian Hviid Mortensen:
"I think certainly that the exhibition can be justified. I have read the article before, and several of the quotes from the included actually in the exhibition, so that people can form their own opinion. And more imagery is not in the show, so I do not think that there is any imminent danger. "
>>60641922
>>60641952
>>60641975
>lolicon directly or indirectly contributed to a significant decrease of sexual crimes against children in Japan
>should be banned because muh feefees from some Western faggot
These people aren't concerned about abused children, they just want to feel good about themselves.
>>60641922
>It's disgusting
Stopped reading right here
>>60642056
>>lolicon directly or indirectly contributed to a significant decrease of sexual crimes against children in Japan
Source?
punishable with castration
>>60636827
No but I think only one person ever got done for having it on his pc.
>>60636827
I'm not sure if we have laws about this..
>>60642057
#TRIGGERED
Don't know
There's
> In August 2007, an Australian was sentenced to pay an A$9,000 fine for attempting to import eight DVDs of Japanese anime and hentai found to contain pornographic depictions of children and 14 found to contain depictions of sexual violence. No images of real children were involved. "Customs National Manager Investigations, Richard Janeczko, said that it was important to understand that even cartoons or drawings such as those depicted in anime were prohibited if they contained offensive sexual content."
And
> Also, in December 2008, a New South Wales Supreme Court judge, Justice Michael Adams, ruled to uphold a magistrate's decision that a pornographic cartoon parodying characters on The Simpsons (Bart and Lisa) was child pornography, because "[i]t follows that a fictional cartoon character, even one which departs from recognisable human forms in some significant respects, may nevertheless be the depiction of a person within the meaning of the Act."
>The Appellant, Alan John McEwan, was fined $3000 Aus ($3,170 US). Judge Adams explained the law was appropriate because cartoons could "fuel demand for material that does involve the abuse of children", also adding "A cartoon character might well constitute the depiction of such a person". A BBC reporter summarized the judge's decision: "he decided that the mere fact that they were not realistic representations of human beings did not mean that they could not be considered people".
>This case has attracted international attention, alongside attention to more local cases, with author Neil Gaiman commenting on it: "I suspect the Judge might have just inadvertantly [sic] granted human rights to cartoon characters. I think it's nonsensical in every way that it could possibly be nonsensical."
So probably not, which is fine by me
>>60642127
http://www.imageandnarrative.be/index.php/imagenarrative/article/view/127
Sources are listed at the end of the document.
>>60642403
Based Neil
>>60642404
but your source doesn't say that it decreased anything
B.C
Maybe
Some people have said yes and others have said no
>>60643022
Page 23
>With regards to lolicon, Takatsuki Yasushi points out that sexual abuse of minors was statistically much more common in Japan in the 1960s and 1970s, and has actually been decreasing since, which roughly coincides with the increasing presence of fictional lolicon (Takatsuki 2010: 258-262).
>Takatsuki, Yasushi. 2010. Rorikon: Nihon no shōjo shikōshatachi to sono sekai [Lolicon: Japan’s Shōjo Lovers and Their World]. Tokyo: Basilico.
>>60636827
Very realistic 3D animation would be illegal, however, 2D loli is totally fine here, as long as you don't distribute it.
>>60643155
>>60636827
No, but on the the plus side you can now get a dog to lick you off.
>>60643155
By the way, here's the book cited by the paper.
https://www.amazon.co.jp/ロリコン-高月-靖/dp/4862381510
>>60643155
Also
>roughly
>>60643529
I'd go rough on you, bby.
Anyway, there's no reason to ban something innocuous just to act holier-than-thou.
