AMERIFATS BTFO
>>60516551
>be australia
>steal new zealand's flag
you will never be forgiven
>pay 3% and remain a lapdog with no representation in Gov't
>pay 35% with independence and representation
Hmmm..
>>60516588
Thanks, Germanon.
>haha you're not cucks who want to be ruled by Germans BTFO
>Australian flag
Not big surprise
>>60516551
What an idiotic comparison.
>>60516972
Would you like it if I made it a food analogy
The taxes were a symbol of lack of sovereignty, they weren't a problem in and of themselves.
>>60516588
This.
Although tbf the only reason Colonies wanted representation was to preserve slavery when England was moving away from it.
>>60516588
>representation
>Whether the American people want a law 100% or 0% it has a 33% chance of passing through congress
>>60517274
As opposed to a parliamentary system where laws are just passed and repealed dependinch on which party is in charge at the time?
>>60517185
Well Half the colonies didn't even allow slavery in any real form, though it certainly was a factor.
>>60517274
>Be Canada
>Be Cucked
>Stay Cucked
>Wishes they were cucked again
Can't make this shit up.
>>60517185
Look at the writings of Thomas Paine. The guys was the mastermind behind the revolution. Had a hate boner for monarchies.
>>60517341
>Laws change depending upon which party the people vote into power
So wait, where is the problem?
>>60516551
>>60517274
AMERICA BTFO
>>60517383
certain laws, especially controversial ones, may take years to have any noticeable effect. If the next lineup of politicians can just strike everything they don't like from before them down, then no progress will ever be made or no lessons learned for the future. All parties will claim that the previous plan was ineffective and a waste when in reality there was no possible time to allow any real results to show.
>>60516588
Agreed, vote Brexit.
>>60517394
>Having any part of your government where lawmakers are appointed by executives
Come on, Canada
>>60517580
You're just mad because they changed their National anthem to be gender neutral.
>>60517185
>Citation needed
The revolution started in Massachusetts and back then, Massachusetts wasn't that keen on slavery.
You have to look to the south. John Adams never owned slaves and many of the founding fathers were abolitionist, but such a thing didn't exist back then.
>>60517394
I wonder if this study has been done with other democracies.
>>60517580
>Having a government where the executive can only be appointment if they have not been elected
>>60517709
What?
>>60517709
You mean the Queen now right?
>>60517746
>>60517749
To be a cabinet minister in Canada you MUST be an ELECTED member of parliament. To be a secretary, haha only women are secretaries rofl, in the states you basically suck the presidents cock and he appoints you because he's king of America.
>>60516551
FREEDOM ISN'T FREE.
>>60517839
It's HIS cabinet. You can't have bipartisanship or other parties sabotaging the President's policies.
If the president picks his cabinet, he can work with people that think like him, and can help him do things his way.
>>60517839
>BE CANCUKIAN
>DISLIKE FEMINIST ON TWITTER
>GET ARRESTED
THIS SERIOUSLY IMPROBABLE TO FABRICATE.
>>60517897
Cabinet ministers are appointed by the governor general at the prime ministers advice. They still need to be elected. The president could let cousin fucking cleetus run the department of agriculture but here only people who have run and won public office may run the actual government. It's not as if Trudeau has been appointing conservatives to work for the executive; they've all members of the liberal party, they're also members of parliament.
>>60517976
>Be American
>Buy kinder surprise
>Get shot
>>60517996
>He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The senate does have the authority to reject cabinet members.
>Ever since the Senate, in 1795, reacted to criticism of John Rutledge’s views on a peace treaty by rejecting his nomination to be chief justice, the American public has been able to claim a voice in the nomination and confirmation process.
It's rare for the senate to do it, but it has been done before.
The system works as it is, but in case of intervention there is legal pathways for congress to intervene. So no, clettus can't be secretary of state.
Huh... Really makes you think...
vote trump
>>60517185
New England abolished slavery before England did.
