Is this graph accurate? Pajeet dominated the world in 1AD?
Yes. Jews and Jesus learned everything in India
>>60449012
it looks somewhat accurate but I doubt its entirely correct. I don't think India was above Europe for that long
They were still riding the Alexander the Great wave
Alexander the Great failed in India.
The only reason they are that high is because of their huge population which has always been big and because their land is fertile as FUCK and has/had a shit ton of natural resources. It's not because of some advanced civilization or something.
When a leader from the greater Persia area needed money for any reason whatsoever, he'd simply go to India and plunder. Mahmud of Ghazni did it 17 times.
>West Europe only
This is excluding the Byzantine Empire. That's bullshit.
>>60449559
>Byzantine Empire
is middle east.
which explains why it's gdp goes to shit by 1000-1500
>>60449354
>the only reason india's gdp was that high was because they properly capitalized on their natural resources 1000 years before the notion of a service economy existed
don't you have some balding to do
>>60449745
This is explained by the Turkic migrations. Not necessarily the Byzantine collapse, even though they are tied together.
>>60449012
what the fuck is this scale
Ok I'm triggered
>>60450075
MAKE ASIA GREAT AGAIN
>>60450054
percentage of world GDP output I believe
pre-industrial gdp is a meme
>>60450075
>Africa
>11% in 1000AD
I need an explanation.
>>60451424
Explain
>>60451760
we wuz kings.
