Would you rather be able to speak multiple foreign languages to a conversation/newspaper level or know 1 foreign language practically fluently?
(besides English)
picture is not related
>>60245435
I would rather know one language as best as it can get. It doesn't even have to be a foreign language.
>>60245435
What, as a free bonus or as a lifetime limit?
If the former, one language perfectly. It's easy to reach newspaper level, but truly mastering a language is a lot more work.
>>60245435
the first one obviously. all the benefits of being able to talk in loads of different countries and it would be a stepping stone to become fluent in one of those languages at least if I wanted to..
>>60245435
im fluent in 9 languages
hebrew being one of them
>>60248948
>im fluent in 9 languages
Most of time you hear this in practice its actually 3 at most
I'm talking actual fluency: being able to read literature and understand it perfectly, etc..
>>60245435
>Would you rather be able to speak multiple foreign languages to a conversation/newspaper level
This seems much more interesting, considering I use it mostly to talk to foreigners and/or visit their countries.
>>60245435
The former. Learning a language to fluency isn't too hard if you know the basics well.
>>60249399
Define basics
lst bump