Why do North Italians hate the monarchy?
I think it's because they were more fascist and hated the king for betrayal
We're Republican fascists
>>59960179
Restoration of Fascism when?
Why would anyone want a monarchy?
>>59960216
>We are still Fascists
>in XXI century
of course
>>59960059
Because they are based.
>>59960059
>Why do North Italians hate the monarchy?
Repubblican tradition
More industrialized = more commies
More fascists
The king abandoned the capital to take refuge in the south, northerners took this as a betrayal
>>59960216
>Restoration of Fascism when?
check flag...ah
>mfw your country has no monarch
Does royal family still live in Italy?
>>59960606
yes
>>59960606
yup
>>59960472
>More industrialized = more commies
Communism took root in Russia, and pre-industrial country.
>>59960667
>>59960685
Is they still beloved?
there are any chance for Italy to join the monarchy countries club again?
>>59960667
>>59960685
>>59960606
But the Royal Family and the Italian State have a bad relationship, doesn't they?
>>59960692
So what? Historically the redder areas have always been the most industrialized ones.
Even in Russia the revolution started in the factories.
>>59960606
>still
They've recently been allowed to come back. They resided in Switzerland for decades after the referendum.
>>59960769
>Is they still beloved?
No. The current head is a literal criminal and his heir is a third tier tv personality.
>there are any chance for Italy to join the monarchy countries club again?
Top kek.
>>59960784
>But the Royal Family and the Italian State have a bad relationship, doesn't they?
Not really? The "royal" family is made of private citizens now, the state has no real involvement with them. Well aside from the head getting in trouble for pimping, tax evasion, drug and weapon smuggling that is. But I dare say they'd take issue with that even if he wasn't a Savoia.
>>59960895
ok interesting
>>59960769
>>59960784
the prince does trash tv shows
>>59960784
>>59960769
We don't hate nor love them, and there's no way they will regain the power in the near future.
>>59960685
These faggots were responsible for uniting Italy. Fuck them. Post-unification Italy is an irrelevant shithole.
>>59960350
Why not?
Shitty failed ideologies as communism are still alive in many people and fascism is a way better than social democrats.
>>59961076
>These faggots
their ancestor, not them
Just fapped to italian porn where a blind lady gets raped in her house
>>59961244
drinking from a cow tit is like sucking a little dick
>>59961076
Italy wasn't relevant disunified after 1600
>>59961076
>These faggots were responsible for uniting Italy.
Top kek. They were closer to blowing it than making it. The merit (or fault) of uniting Italy lies with Cavour and Garibaldi.
>>59961286
you tell me
>>59960606
Cutest princess
>>59961488
And alpha king
>>59961314
>American flag
Of course.
>>59961314
One could argue that the cause of the irrelevance wasn't the disunity (tho it didn't help either).
Venice for example was Netherlands sized, yet they fell off the map due to mostly internal issues and natural causes (like the pestilences).
That said it's not like we became relevant after unification either, and regardless the unification was done in such a shit way that we're still feeling the consequences. Cattaneo was right, Mazzini should have stayed in Britain.
>>59961537
>citation: america
>>59961404
8 cm of nipple
>>59961488
>>59961532
t. erroni
>>59961488
>>59961532
If I immigrated to Italy, I vote for restoration of monarchy
too cute'n cool.
>I don't like the Italy unification
>>59961557
there's also the shifting of trading routes from the mediterranean sea to the atlantic ocean.
>>59961637
italian*
fmsu
>>59960606
No Japan, we don't allow shit-tier countries to join the Monarchy club, thus Italy's not allowed to join. Sweden and Norway - you're all out! Any Eastern European shitholes - you're out, too!
>>59961794
Its not like Monarchy is good, still hoping for the third republic here
>>59961684
That's actually a very overstated element, it helped others develop more than damage us.
Also by the time the shift happened, Italy had already been through the italian wars and half of it was under foreign domination, so you can't really say it caused the political fall.
And even after that, Venice for example was still an economic powerhouse all the way to Campoformio, tho all the ottoman wars fairly raped the national treasury and the cultural shift in aristocratic occupations away from trade meant a lot of wealth had become fairly stagnant. Trade was still strong tho.
>>59961835
Monarchies only work for God-tier nations, which is why you can't muster the true power Monarchies present.
>>59961794
Your monarchy is just figureheads. They don't have any real power. They're just there to look pretty and waste the country's money.
>>59961557
Unification was a necessary bad thing.
>>59961936
>necessary
Why? All the city-states were doing well on their own.
>>59961936
United Italy was necessary.
An Italy under the centralized and authoritarian piemontese government wasn't.
Don't let Mazzini meme you. Even Cavour (and Ricasoli, Cattaneo, Gioberti, etc.) thought a confederation would have been the best choice, but of course the political situation in the Kingdom was strongly against it so he couldn't really support it.
>>59961987
>All the city-states were doing well on their own.
Not since the italian wars m8.
>>59961987
They were all under foreigners country influence noone of them actually had any power.
Italy should have been unified earlier with federico 2 or cosimo de medici.
>>59960685
they were disihinerited, he is the king now
>>59962164
Italian wars? That happened during the Renaissance, idiot. It was the best period for Italy besides ancient history.
>>59961987
>city states
I don't remember us having city states at the time.
>>59961890
Keep telling yourself that.
Germany made the good choice
France did too.
fuck off.
>>59962513
Lel no.
You guys were cooler under a king.
>>59962289
Actually that's disputed, but noone really care though
Southerners also seemed to like fascism
the north fell into civil war after 43 and the king did nothing
(aside from the fact that he never opposed the fascist regime that dragged us into war)
>>59962703
literally mob controlled elections
>>59960059
because we suffered the civil war while southerners were scratching their balls under the protection of angloamerican forces
>>59962289
I thought his shirt was open for a sec. Kek.
>>59962749
>Muh squadrism
>>59962749
>literally mob controlled elections
I guess it also explain the high MSI score in Naples
>>59962703
they simply are always 50 years late
>>59962363
>It was the best period for Italy besides ancient history.
It ended with half of Italy under either Valois or Habsburg domination, and the other half economically and politically bankrupt you turd.
If it were up to me they would be still exiled.
>>59962513
>Germany
>Making a good choice
>France
>Making a good choice
actually laughed
>>59962565
no way
>Top tier
France under our beloved God-Emperor
>Mid tier
France under the 1st republic
the 2nd republic
the 3rd republic
France under the 2nd empire
>Shit tier
France under absolute monarchy
France under the 4th republic
the 5th republic
3rd empire when
I wonder why most liberalized countries (Holland, Sweeden and so on) keep monarchism
>>59963120
i also wonder why Japan keeps a useless emperor.
>>59963120
Can't speak for either Holland nor Sweden, but the only real reason we keep our royals around is because we actually chose to have them after our independence. However embarrassing and useless they may be, getting rid of them would be admitting we made a mistake when setting up our whole system of governance. As you can probably imagine, that's not really ideal, it's got to be said.
>>59963333
He was always useless. The shogunate was the real deal.
>>59960059
to be honest, Savoia were bad monarchs. Maybe because they weren't monarchs in the first place, they were king only because they bought the kingdom of Sardinia
>>59963120
They had no traumatic happening which made them abolish the monarchy, unlike other nations in Europe.
>>59963120
Because they were always liberal so they didn't have any revolutions to get rid of their king. Nowadays there's not really any point in getting rid of your monarch if you're a 1st world country
tell em about italians, why are they brown
>>59963333
Tbh I'd also be in favour of keeping alive a 1600 to 2600 years old institution, deposing it would be like tearing down the Colosseo: minimal gains for gigantic losses in tradition.
>>59963443
>bought
wut
>>59963476
We share ancestry with Angloids.
>>59963333
desu, Emperor has been useless these 1000 years.
He has been an idol or a pop star, and we had loved him.
>>59963476
>why are they brown
The sun. Not a big fucking mystery, is it?
>>59963566
that guy looks dago as fuk
>>59963443
>they were king only because they bought the kingdom of Sardinia
Bought it? They were forced to swap Sicily for Sardinia after the war of the spanish succession.
>>59960059
This map is a complete fucking shitshow, whoever designed it should be chemically castrated desu
>>59963620
He's 100% British. So is this guy.
>>59963608
then why Norwegian under the sun become orange at best?
>>59963620
He really doesn't, like at all. Those facial features are extremely different from the average italian face.
You only think it looks italian because you see brown and you're trying to force the point that italians are brown.
>Marsala: so named from Arabic marsa Ali ‘port of Ali’.
lmao, there are italian cities named after arabs
>>59961537
Did you miss him saying after 1600? Ofcourse Italy was important during the renasaince which this includes.
post patrician italian states
>>59963720
>london
>londinium
Lmao, we named your cities
>>59963763
genoa ancestry reporting in
>>59963791
this will totally not turn into a shitfest at all
>>59963714
Not him, but dago means a spaniard. Wop is an Italian
>>59963720
It's no secret that Sicily was conquered by Mudslimes once. They aren't part of Italy though.
>>59963709
Lack of melanin. It's not uncommon to take supplements, actually.
>>59963720
>Colchester
>from Colonia and Castra
You're just as cucked.
>>59963856
dago is interchangeable with any southern european
>>59963856
We use the word "paki" as an offensive term for english.
>>59963856
>>59963892
every single -chester is *name* + castra
english merchants helped Christianise Marsala by exporting it's wine
>>59963955
Yes but usually the non castra part comes from a local word. Colchester on the other hand is 100% cucked, since the col comes from colonia.
>>59963791
>UK
>capital founded by wops
>currently ruled by a literal paki
can't make this shit up
>>59964047
>not being from a shire
why do people think brown is bad, and that being culturally enriched by golden era muslims is shameful? Are they this small minded?
>>59964065
London is Welsh
>>59964101
Are there even cities with shire in their names? I thought it was a county suffix.
>>59964143
you're right, but sicily is shit anyway
>>59964155
who the fuck cares, I'm from Cardiff
>>59964143
it was Arabic influence in Southern Italy that created the mafia
>>59963791
>The etymology of London is uncertain.[53] It is an ancient name, found in sources from the 2nd century. It is recorded c.121 as Londinium, which points to Romano-British origin
>Richard Coates put forward an explanation in 1998 that it is derived from the pre-Celtic Old European *(p)lowonida, meaning 'river too wide to ford
Who's "we" anyway? Your Roman ancestors were Syrian immigrants.
>>59964152
lel no , it comes from londinium.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymology_of_London
>>59964143
Does it really matter that it was their golden age? The genes are the same as today's sandniggers, and getting cucked is shameful regardless of the cuckoo. Just ask the brits, they were so assravaged by the roman domination that they even shilled a genocidal failure like Boudicca just to have a single example of defiance against the invaders (Caratacus would really have been a better choice tho).
>>59964253
>it was Arabic influence in Southern Italy that created the mafia
B-but there's no organized crime in the Arab world, in matter fact many countries are on par with EU when it comes to crime rates if not lower. We just have shitty culture of repression that's it.
>>59964355
>he's never heard of the Lebanese mafia
>>59964288
> Your Roman ancestors were Syrian immigrants.
>>59964354
But Luigi entire Europe owes most of its genes to the middle east
>>59964333
it comes from llundain
>>59964376
Ironically the only country with Christian dominance in the middle east
>>59964288
>>59964383
>caring about this either way
Syrians were White before they mixed with nigs and arabs.
>>59964355
Hamas is literally a mafia my palestinian friend
>>59964333
well probably londinium was a latinization of some fucked up welsh name.
>>59964288
>Your Roman ancestors were Syrian immigrants
This is such a meme. Immigration to Rome and Italy was never a relevant factor, the senate made sure of that well before Syria became part of the republic. Freedmen were the only real source of diversity in the citizenry, and those were mostly gauls and greeks, and most freeborn freedmen preferred to go back home anyway.
>>59964414
>The etymology of London is uncertain
The root word came from welsh(MAYBE) but the romans where the first to name it londinium
>>59964460
How so? They are rogue state by definition. They have government departments, security agencies, political ideology..etc
They are shitty, there's no arguing with that though.
>Turkish mafia
>Leb mafia
>Italian mafia
>Albanian mafia
>Armenian mafia
>Greek mafia
>Mexican and Colombian cartels
what's up with brown people and organised crime?
>>59964499
Would you really care about having ancient Syrian ancestry or not though? Syrians back then were very different to Syrians now.
>>59964452
>Brazilian nigger doing a white version of we wuz kingz n shiet on syrians
This is why apes in zoos shouldn't be given internet access.
>>59964499
You are forgetting a point that Syria at the times of Roman republic had many Hellenistic cities with large ones like Antioch.
>>59964499
>b-but but... m-muh Moors
>>59964632
you're the darkest people in Europe, it must come from somewhere
>>59964590
They literally looked white, retard. Most levants look whiteish even with nig and arab admixture.
>>59964585
why can't northeners organize their own crime? they always need to import immigrants by the boatload to do thing properly for them
>>59964585
You forgot:
>Irish mafia
>Jewish mafia
>Russian mafia
>Triad gangs
>Yakuza
>Israeli mafia
>British firms
>>59964585
>armenians
>brown
>>59964654
one day you'll see the sun anon, maybe even a blue sky, don't despair
>>59964757
I knew an armenian guy and he was pretty brownish
>>59964731
>Irish
>Jewish
>Israeli
>white
also British firms are all Irish, Jews and gypsies, not white brits
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marocchinate
>tfw only just found out about this
>it perfectly explains why so many people from near rome look like literal arabs
pretty horrible shit as well
why has it been erased from italy's collective consciousness?
>>59964654
From living in a sunny country you pasty cunt
>>59964654
We were never dirty white cumskins like you pasty pigs. Since way before romans the ethnicity was masterrace mediterranean, not uncivilized mud-eating barbarians.
>>59964499
>This is such a meme.
No, you're a dumb Arab. There are numerous records that show the majority in Rome were middle eastern by the late Roman empire. In the distant future the london mayors great great grandson will say Muslim immigration was never a relevant factor in the UK too.
>>59964823
probably because it wasn't rape, italian women enjoyed it
De Sica made a film about it though
>>59964394
That doesn't really take anything away from my point.
>>59964849
tell that to your gf who loves pasty northern europeans
>>59964867
>Amerignorant confusing Arabs with master race Mesopotamians who had light skin
>>59964757
They are literally Levantines in denial, them and Assyrians.
>>59964823
>soldati francesi
>soldati
>sono marocchini
non sono sorpreso
>>59964823
La ciociara
>>59964939
Mesopotamians were cavemen who went extinct
>>59964867
>numerous records
>>59964950
FRENCH'D
>>59964588
>Would you really care about having ancient Syrian ancestry or not though?
No, I wouldn't. I'm just autistic about history, and there were no significant migrations to Italy in roman time aside from the germans (and the celts technically, but those areas weren't roman at the time).
>>59964607
So what?
>>59964867
>There are numerous records that show the majority in Rome were middle eastern by the late Roman empire.
Top kek, post them.
Not that it matters, Rome was big but less than 10% of the italian population lived there at the time.
>>59964823
when will Fr*nch scum pay us for reparations?
allies scum are such hypocrites (atomic bomb, rape, war crimes too...).
>>59964288
>Richard Coates put forward an explanation in 1998 that it is derived from the pre-Celtic Old European *(p)lowonida, meaning 'river too wide to ford
I thought nothing was known about Pre Indo-European languages except for Basque.
Is saying "lol you're Arabs" just a defence mechanism by countries that are well on their way to actually becoming muslim majority?
Answer: Probably yes
>>59965115
So there might have happened some immigrations
Don't forget that J2 is found everywhere in south Italy, which is originally from levant and northern fertile crescent. And then the Ashkenazi jews who are share a lot of similarities with southern Italians.
>>59965207
Pre-celtic isn't pre-indoeuropean, it's proto-indoeuropean, of which we know a bit.
>>59964661
Italians were the the same race for 3,000 years but the Middle East became brown? Did their skin turn brown the instant they converted to Islam? You're a fucking idiot.
>>59965217
Look at those people. They look part nigger. How can you say South Euros look like that? Only levants bear some resemblance to them.
>>59965263
They mixed with African slaves and Arabs from the Arabian peninsula which were dark as fuck. Climate changes occurred there as well.
>>59965367
strong roman profile there tbqhfamshabfne
>>59964939
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elagabalus
>Elagabalus was Roman emperor from 218 to 222. A member of the Severan dynasty, he was Syrian
>The deity Elagabalus was initially venerated at Emesa. This form of the god's name is a Latinized version of the Syrian Ilāh hag-Gabal, which derives from Ilāh (a Semitic word for "god") and gabal (an Aramaic word for "mountain")
>Cassius Dio reported that Elagabalus would paint his eyes, epilate his hair and wear wigs before prostituting himself in taverns, brothels,[42] and even in the imperial palace
That's some master race genes you got there.
>>59965226
>So there might have happened some immigrations
It's far more likely that shit came from the greek colonization and the arabs in the middle ages than during roman times. It was pretty much impossible for free men to immigrate to Rome en masse under the empire due to the simple fact that the city had enormous employment and food scarcity issues which made it impossible for non citizens (romans had the dole) to survive there unless they were rich. Necessarily rich people can't move en masse because there's no masse of them.
>>59965451
>romans were unironically ruled by Arabs
JUST
>>59965486
They were, but the Severans weren't Arab
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_the_Arab
>>59965486
You now realize that you were ruled by people ruled by arabs.
>>59965451
Late Romans:
>Semitic genes
check
>Semitic religion
check
>prostitutes themselves to men
check
Modern Italians:
>Semitic genes
check
>Semitic religion
check
>prostitutes themselves to men
check
Modern Italians are idential to late Romans and Late Romans were sandniggers.
>>59965571
you niggers couldn't get us to speak latin or even stay catholics
>>59965540
>nickname
Not indicative of his real ethnicity. He also doesn't have any Arabic features.
>>59965540
He was called arab because the romans called Jordan Arabia back then, but he was a syrian too.
>>59965649
his dad was a syrian
these threads are always hilarious
>>59965458
But that's the point, Mario. Levant wasn't Arabian back then it was a mix of Greeks, Romans, Hittite, Phoenicians and Sea people.
>>59965644
Top kek, your aristocracy spoke latin even before the claudian invasion, you were cucked as fuck. The only reason you didn't keep speaking latin was that you were then cucked two other times afterwards.
>>59965730
Agreed
>>59965670
The region he came from spoke Aramaic unironically but yes they were ethnically Arabians.
>>59965741
So again I ask you: how does that fact (which I'm not even contesting) prove that there was a migration from Syria to Rome?
>>59965752
superior Anglo-Saxons saved us
>>59965818
From what, inbreeding? They just cucked you and left you open to further cuckening from the danes and normans.
>>59965818
>noooo you didn't cuck us, we were cucked by another bigger cucklord.
is this british pride? to claim they were raped by literally anyone on this planet?
>>59965853
saved us from your disgusting gabagool language
>>59965727
Yeah and ancient Syrians weren't Arabs. His facial features don't really stick out with the rest of the Roman emperors.
>>59965741
The Levant was always majority Semitic. Saying they're a mix of Greeks or Hittites is like saying India is a mix of British because Brits occupied India for a short time. Levantines looked the same today as they did 2,000 years ago.
>>59965812
Because I just said, Ashkenazi jews immigrated from this region to Italy and intermarried with them making the italians one of their closest genetic brothers. And Ashkenazis today number in millions, and that's only one group from the orient that was possible due to their religious nature that kept them isolated. I think other groups made it as well but probably melted in the gene pot since it wasn't that much different back then.
>>59965878
he looks like a damn nigger
>>59965868
but women all over the world usually agreed romance languages are the most beautiful.
>>59965853
>>59965858
>danes
>normans
both germanic
you failed to hold a grip on us, and we outdid all your other colonies like Spain, mad as fuck Germanic ancestry 4 lyfe
>>59965878
>>59965909
the swollen face reminds me a little of churcill desu
>>59965910
that's not what italian women think
>>59965964
>both germanic
Exactly, unlike you and your celtic blood.
Anglos always brag about the weirdest things.
>>59965964
>original bretons
>germanic
anon I....
>>59965891
Except several studies were done on the topic and showed the genetics of the population were much closer to European clusters before the 7th century. And not just genetics, historical proofs as well as it is documented in several sources the existence of a large greek population in Palestine up until 12th century, and that while not mentioning the philistines who were a part of the Sea people and excavations show that they had larger and more populated cities than their hebrew counterpart and they dominantly had greek culture. And this is just a part of the Levant. In the north you had Antioch one of the biggest Hellenistic cities back then. But sure thing m8.
>>59966013
>>59966027
actually I've researched my family tree and 70% of my ancestors surnames are Anglo-Saxon, 20% are Celtic and 10% are French/Latin
>>59966134
>surnames
TOP FUCKING KEK
Like that matters any, stabilization of surnames in Europe only happened in the early modern period. My surname is frankish in origin, does that mean I'm a germ too?
>>59966229
my surname is of pre-7th century origins so I am paternally descended from original Anglo-Saxon settlers
>>59966298
>so I am paternally descended from original Anglo-Saxon settlers
...Or from whoever chose to associate with them in the ten centuries between then and the stabilization of surnames.
Servants taking the name of their masters is literally one of the most common ways for surnames to spread.
>>59966036
>before the 7th century
>until 12th century
Greeks by that time were themselves sandniggers and Levantines were part-hellenized. Hellenic names by that time were equivalent of Islamic names. If someone is named Mohammed, he's probably a sandnig, if someone in second century Rome had a Greek name he was probably a sandnig.
>>59966368
also their first names were also Anglo-Saxon like Alfred and Edmund, definitely a Germanic tribe
>>59966408
Why do you care so much, Amerilard? They both belonged to ancient civilizations. They weren't like the dirty peninsula Arabs whose only real achievement was being warmongers and spreaders of a cancerous barbaric religion.
>>59966408
>Greeks by that time were themselves sandniggers
Except they weren't. And many Greeks lived here and most of them left with the crusaders due to crusaders fucking up the relations between Muslims and Christians in the Levant which caused the Muslims to start the campaign of either convert or leave in addition to sizeable migrations that followed.
>>59965644
Your mouth says no, but your heart says yes. You love us, stop fighting your emotions!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italophilia
>>59966626
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Italianism
>>59966656
>USA opinion
Literally irrelevant
meanwhile:
"Educated people in Europe were familiar with the works of Dante and Boccaccio, which dominated the literature of the Middle Ages, and with their contemporary Petrarch, who had established the most important lyric poetry tradition in Europe. These works had a significant influence on Shakespeare, Chaucer and many other writers of the Middle Ages and Renaissance."
Kek, we pratically did your best literature works. Why does england loves italy so much?
>>59966738
we just use you for food and cheap barbers
>>59966783
but we literally wuz your kangz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_of_Modena
>>59966849
she was just some King's wife
>>59966656
>Anti-Italianism in the United States resulted among some Americans in reaction to the period of large-scale Italian immigration beginning in the last part of the 19th century. Prior to that time, Italians, who had lived in North America from the beginning of the 17th century, were respected craftsmen, musicians, soldiers, merchants, missionaries, educators, artists and architects.[1] Italians and their descendants played an important role in the exploration and settlement of America, and were generally well regarded.
So it was just the poor southerner immigrants who gave them a bad image then. Makes sense. Italians have a good image here in Brazil because they came mostly from the north and center.
Wish we had a monarch.
>>59966622
the nablusi niqqua bringing the heat once again
>>59967377
you already do tho
>>59967402
Not really, just a standard strongman.
>>59967427
The days of USSR came back, and now the rulers of the former sovok will rule untill their death, it's just not as official as it was back then.
>>59967288
I think the issue was more that anglos in general are scared shitless of catholics. That's why irish and catholic germans were treated just as bad in the US and the sizeable northern italian part of italian immigration to Australia was treated as bad as the southern part.
I love how Northern Italians on /int/ try to sound serious and informed when in fact they are butthurt ignorant autists
>>59967496
ok, but i want a tsar anyway
>>59967508
Well, but the part I quoted right there says Italians were well regarded in the US before mass immigration from the southern parts of the country happened.
>>59967525
you sound way more butthurt
why are you shilling for regional banter, though? are you some /ita/ memer?
>>59967508
Catholics disgust me
>>59966572
>only real achievement was being warmongers and spreaders of a cancerous barbaric religion.
You're talking about Brazilians.
>>59966622
>Except they weren't
No they were sandnigs like Elagabalus.
let's just agree anything south of Genoa isn't white
If there's a book that has to ask if you're white then you're not.
>>59968690
The Po river is the usual border.
Or the Adige if you're venetian.
>>59968690
t.welsh of genoese (read jewish) origin
All of italy is white
because they are based
south italians are basically middle easterners
>>59968871
t.errone
>>59968881
>because they are based
That might have been true several hundred years ago, guys like Dante and Da Vinci were all from the north but north Italians are all mixed with southern Italians now.
I have to take a long shit
>>59968953
Holy shit, you're so fucking annoying. I'm seriously considering filtering American flags because of you. Americans do nothing but post low quality garbage.
>>59968953
y-you mean I can't eat polenta anymore? onyl gabagool and cannoli? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>59969160
he isn't exactly wrong, Southerners move to the North all the time
>>59969355
And Muslims create sharia controlled zones in your country.
>>59969445
>implying I'm a brit
>>59969230
>gabagool
This is a real word? lmao
>>59969780
it isn't ,retard
>>59969823
how the fuck would I know
>>59969780
>>59969823
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gabagool
>This is an addition to the previous definition, which is half right. "Gabagool" is slang for "capicola." It is not a mispronunciation, but is instead in Napolitan dialect, which is what the Sopranos and many Italian-Americans use.
>>59963118
>Absolute Monarchy
>Shit tier
How about no
>>59960895
>So what? Historically the redder areas have always been the most industrialized ones.
yeah like USA, Britain, France, West Germany - oh wait
>>59967508
Maybe it's because they were seen as trashy people with different cultures m. Protestants had very similar cultures. The best immigrants were brits and Swedes
>>59965621
you're right , she's clearly arabic
>>59968759
Can't wait for the latinos to take over your country
>>59968881
Ya'll motherfuckers are missing the point, italy is a fucking mealting pot between europe and med countries, you CAN'T find a standard facial structure for italian people: some are celtic , some are germanic, some latin, some middle-eastern, some are even slavic.
The entire thread is based on the false premise that all italian people look about the same, which is bullshit. ITALY IS THE MOST GENETIC DIVERSE COUNTRY IN EUROPE.
