Serious speaking...
Why is America so based? Not even Australia do this.
>Freedom of religion is a constitutional right
>Ban the practice of a religion
>>59820183
Does this just ban shari'a courts. Not a bad idea desu
>>59820236
You don't have the freedom to force religious laws on others
>>59820236
>sharia law
>law
>separation of church and state
>>59820236
But Shariah law is anti-democracy
>>59820183
sharia law is banned australia wide, we follow common law
>>59820282
Christians do it all the time
>>59820236
You don't need sharia to practice Islam. Otherwise the Muslims in Turkey or other secular countries would be screwed.
>>59820344
What? Show me an example.
>>59820344
They used to do it. Now mormons are the ones who try to do it (but they are christians at a point as well), but it's only like "pls join us pls", not direct forcing.
>Washington
How can one state be so based?
This doesn't make sesnse. Sharia law is a legal system, in what sense is it banned? Is the sharia system used in courts in the other states? In Quebec we use Napoleonic law and English Canada they have common law, I think these are the only systems allowed here.
>>59820388
Then it's not forcing at all.
That being said, the states that ban sharia law are pretty silly. The U.S. Constitution pretty effectively prevents a Muslim takeover. And the number of Muslims in and coming to the U.S. is so small that they could never hope to change our laws.
>>59820452
>expecting state legislatures not to pass retarded 'red meat' legislation they know has no bearing on reality
>>59820183
How do you even ban sharia law? Either you have it or you don't.
>>59820452
It's banned in the sense that it can't be used for settling matters even in special courts that aren't part of the government's judicial system, I suppose.
>>59820550
So it's just symbolic then. In Quebec we have a language office which banned the word "pasta" from Italian restaurant names because it's a foreign word and a threat to our culture, so now they have to use pâtes. Also there's a law that parrots in pet stores have to speak in French not English.
>>59820408
Feels good to live here man
>>59820452
In that it will never be in use by any court in that state? They merely stated that shiria law would not be allowed under any circumstances like say whats going on in the UK.
>>59820383
Banning gay marriage.
Though "2 wrongs don't make a right". Just because christians do it doesn't mean muslism should do it. Neither should.
>>59820630
Of course. There's no way for sharia to become relevant without legislative action to begin with. State law books as full of gestures and occasional wacky shit like restrictions on alligator walking or eating ice cream in the bath.
>>59820574
>ban sharia law
State legislature and courts can not use any form of Islamic law as a basis rulings. No law can be above the State and Federal Constitution. It's superfluous but honey for voting bee's. Middle Americans eat that shit up as giant middle finger to the rest of the world.
>>59820701
where is that banned in the US
>>59820912
No longer, but for years politicians used of religious presets and conceptions as a valid argument to ouaw a practice. It's just an example of church mixing with the state. I'm just giving an example. I'm gay so I assure you I want islam as far away as possible.
>>59821085
that has nothing to do with separation of religion and state, study the common law you retard before acting like an expert
>>59821131
What are you even talking about?
A person who wants to outlaw a practice because their religion says so. That's what we are talking about. So its ok when christians fo it, but okay for muslims to do it?
All religious should be banned. Atheism is the highest state of human development
>>59821390
*tips*
And Christians don't do that. They just whine a lot
>>59821490
>Christians have never passed laws based on their religious beliefs
lol okay
>>59821531
So saying murder should be unlawful, an opinion which I base on my religious beliefs, is bad?
>>59820183
Serious speaking...
Why is Australia so based? Not even America do this.
>>59820630
>In Quebec we have a language office which banned the word "pasta" from Italian restaurant names because it's a foreign word and a threat to our culture
So why does Quebec get to not fall for the multicultural mosaic meme, when every other province does?
>>59821750
The Trudeaus seek to destroy the Anglo culture of Canada by importing foreigners to the Anglo provinces
>>59820876
>State legislature and courts can not use any form of Islamic law as a basis rulings
This is the case absolutely everywhere in the first world.
>>59821647
>His """""""""""""""""""""""""""country""""""""""""""""""""""""""" only has 7 states
you cannot, simply CANNOT invent such a fable.
>>59822014
They mean those special arbitration courts that don't have any legal status but can socially make decisions
>>59822057
It can't specifically be seperated from gang law or any other sort of random minority decision making process and pretending to ban any of them is ridiculous. The only issue is when the outcome as a result of the 'ruling' falls under human rights violations.
>>59822039
Six, and two territories.
>>59820183
>my state bans this
Thank Christ
>>59820236
Sharia Law is a code of laws
>>59822039
>his """""country""""" of """""freedums""""" only allows SOME parts of ONE STATE (OUT OF 50) to pay for sex
YOU CANNOT FABRICATE THESE LIES
>>59822153
DELET
>>59822153
It makes paying for hookers more thrilling you smeg
>>59821647
Brothels are legal in WA, I grew up two houses down from one, didn't know about it until a few years ago.
>>59822153
>Paying for sex
Is there anything more beta?
>>59820701
Marriage is a service provided by the government. No one has the "right" to any kind of marriage.
>>59820236
Worshiping Satan is legal in the US. Ritual sacrifice of babies is not. You can practice your religion within US law.
>>59820344
Ah the old muslim ally the atheist self hating loser
>>59825878
You sound pretty upset my friend.
>>59820183
>mfw I live in a certain southern red state.
>>59820701
>banning gay marriage
Except it wasn't. 2 fags can buy a ring, host a ceremony, have cake, and do whatever else they want.
>>59820701
Retarded faggot
>>59820701
>Christians
>banning gay marriage
Do you know even communists hate gays like you?
Estados Unidos estão salvando o ocidente.
>>59829618
Detalhe que é do sul conservador.
>1% muslim population
>quick lads lets ban sharia
sharia is a ridiculous nonsense but wtf are americans afraid of so much?
We stand with Dixie
>>59834116
Dixie doesn't sound masculine. I don't know why.
>>59823644
Any service provided by the government must be non-rivalrous and non-exclusive, as by definition it is a public good. Up until recently, there was discrimination in the application of marriages to heterosexual couples only. He has a point.
Tbh this is just retarded fear mongering. Forcing religious law on others is already illegal, there is literally no actual reason to ban sharia law specifically.
It's like when Harper specifically outlawed honour killings, murder was already illegal there was literally no point in passing that law.
>>59835535
b-but MUH WHITE CHRISTIAN HERITAGE IS UNDER ATTACK
D-DEUS V-VULT
>>59820383
Abortion bans, not teaching evolution in schools, making the Bible the official state book just to name a few.
There ought to be laws preventing the implementation of Christian religious law since that's actually a possibility in many states.
>>59820183
God bless Virginia.
>>59820667
What's going on in the UK is already illegal. Taking the law into your own hands is illegal, regardless of what kind of law you try to implement. It's pretty obvious that this is just legislation designed to make it seem like Muslims are more of a threat than they are to the US so they can distract people from real issues.
Islamophobia is on rise in the USA...
damn hypocritical country
>>59835411
Because it sounds like name you'd give to a cute female dog.
>>59835701
Who would win?
>>59835535
Look at Britain, they officially recognize Shariah law when it comes to family matters. Those American states which banned Shariah also preemptively banned Shariah's use in familial matters.
>>59820183
But most countries state that the country's law is the only law and any deviation from this is taking matters in own hands and is therefore illegal.
State bans just sound like populism.
>>59835701
I don't get it
>>59837075
>But most countries state that the country's law is the only law and any deviation from this is taking matters in own hands and is therefore illegal
This is not happening in the UK.
>>59835830
The might of the proletariat.
>2016
>not being a valiant communist and crushing smelly jihadist scum
Soviet-Afghan war 2.0 when?
>>59837147
If communism is so good why do you leave China for Canada?
>>59837123
the law is the law m8, it already 'happened' centuries ago before your made up country even existed
>>59835619
>abortion ban is a bad thing
Fuck off Chung no wonder you cunts can't breed above replacement and need niggers and mudskins to have babies for you.
>>59837123
>One authority holds that the council has no legal authority or jurisdiction in the United Kingdom,[3] and can not impose any penalties; many Muslims would appear voluntarily to accept the rulings made by the ISC.[6] Another report holds that Muslim tribunals exploit a legal loophole which allows sharia courts to be classified as arbitration courts, which allows their rulings to be binding in law.[4]
It kind is. The Sharia courts are either straight up illegal or at best exploiting a legal loophole.
>>59837189
>China
>communist
And many keks were had that day.
>>59837267
If you don't like abortions then don't get one, but making it illegal does nothing except create a bunch of homeless crackbabies and coat hanger abortions.
>>59837272
no 'sharia court' in this country is legally binding, end of story, exactly the same as rabbinical courts
>>59837373
That's pretty terrible desu. Get yourselves a written constitution that specifies separation of Church and state. I don't care if the Queen is the head of the church, it isn't worth this.
>>59837373
Seriously?
>>59837365
Neither of that is true in Irelans. Maybe you need to be a little less limp wristed and a little more Conservative?
>>59820183
Most of those posting under the US flag on /int/ come from the blue states, and are self-hating whites and progressive millennials of the following type:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0diJNybk0Mw
