[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
There are so many poo in loos compared to one british How did
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /int/ - International

Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2
File: image.jpg (301 KB, 940x841) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
301 KB, 940x841
There are so many poo in loos compared to one british

How did they rule india? Did british make india better? What is outcomes?


thank you
>>
>>59092813
Brits had better weapons and used divide and conquer method which works surprisingly well in regions with lots of smaller kingdoms fighting each other. Also Mughal Empire was on it's last legs and getting fucked repeatedly by the Marathas.
>>
india was made up of many nations

in order to rule over them they appeased then controlled the remnant of the biggest, the mughal and the maratha

after many military districts and so forth the indians began to rely them for order and protection so they introduced centralized bureaucracy for the whole sub-contient

YW!
>>
>>59093026
>>59093026
>Did british make india better?
In some ways yes, but in many ways no. They did create the railway system and put in place a good school system. But they also completely ruined manufacturing and the economy in India.
>>
>>59093026
>>59093054
Do you think Brits made India better in the long run?
>>
>>59093182
It made individual nation states worse but they introduced the indian patriotism and universial education and colleges so it is double-edged

India the sub-continent became india in country, for better or worse
>>
>>59092813
Brits exploited indian infighting.
>>
>>59093182
I don't think there would be a single united India today if it weren't for the British Raj. But I think individually the smaller kingdoms would have been better off now if there was no colonialism. But it could also have just as easily turned into a mess of constant wars like the middle east so no one really knows.
>>
>>59092813

We were a nation divided and used to being ruled, easy and profitable target

Technology+making friends in the right places helped the brits out

Pretty much what other posters have said.

Sad to say but cuck and Beta are both words that fit India
>>
File: 1412247783201.png (432 KB, 1304x1818) Image search: [Google]
1412247783201.png
432 KB, 1304x1818
>>59092813

this should answer all your questions lad
>>
>>59093774
Yeah that's moronic and not what happened. Why do brits always try to twist history to fit their narrative? Actual British soldiers did barely any fighting. They formed alliances with other kingdoms and slowly took over that way.
Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.