are you happy with the people in your paper money?
who would you actually put there? (if not)
>>58205556
That money would be really cool, if Ameridumb weren't such a cucks
>paper money
automatic third world status
>>58205556
Yeah I suppose so. They change who is on the paper money every 10-15 years.
>>58205601
You're retarded. Those are terrible designs.
>>58205648
how is it terrible?
>>58205648
Yeah because this is so much better...
>>58205556
We don't have people in your paper money, there are some monuments and no one cares about it. And I think it's good that we don't have them.
>>58205690
Atrociously bad image choices in almost all cases.
>>58205707
What do you care nigger? You don't have money anyway.
>>58205648
It's good, you tasteless cunt
>>58205602
> be abbo
> implement bitcoin
> it takes a week to exchange money
> have to send handletter to confirm payment due to system difficulties
>>58205807
see
>>58205789
You have idiotic and ignorant as fuck taste in imagery.
We are ahead
I'd probably take out those filthy commies Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo from our 500 bill and put someone like Vicente Guerrero, Guadalupe Victoria, Agustin de Iturbide or go back to Ignacio Zaragoza.
>>58205878
At least you went with a president.
>>58205556
That already looks kind of outdated, current dollars are ok
>>58205789
Aside from the five and twenty which are somewhat meaningless the rest are great. The designs look similar to the new swiss francs.
>>58205878
Ahead of Liberia perhaps
>>58205953
Wrong. The 1, 5, 10, 20, and 50 are terrible. They didn't even use the Moon landing photo for the astronaut.
Not that it matters. Those designs were all made by some autistic art student and will never, ever be implemented.
>>58205556
>commies in my monies
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEE
>>58206043
It's minimalist, but it's not autistic. To me the thing that's worse is the rear of the notes. I assume there's DNA strands and some scientific references on the first three along with the star chart on the 100, but they're too bland.
Keeping in line with the current motif of having portraits of famous Americans but in greyscale would have worked better.
Mostly yes. They are gone long enough not to be controversial.
>>58205953
I really like the backside of this norwegian concept
There's been a lot of butthurt here (and in the US, it seems) about how there aren't any women on the banknotes (excluding The Queen, I guess), so they're talking about replacing a relevant historical figure (who happens to be male) with...some random feminazi cunt.
I really hope they don't, but since our PM is a self-proclaimed feminist, it's probably going to.
>>58206068
man it must suck having Kim Jong Ill on your currency
>>58205556
All of the people in our paper money are american presidents and theres nothing we can do about it, so we dont care
>>58206994
Who are these people? Honestly curious, and I can't quite read the text. I know John A. MacDonald was your first prime minister, but that's it. And obviously, I know the queen.
>>58207410
Here are higher-res images of the face sides.
Also for those who don't know, the white part is actually transparent (see >>58207135).
Commemorative version they released recently. It's a normal-circulation bill, but it's still pretty neat.
We used to have 1 000$ bills, but they haven't produced them for over twenty years.
>>58207647
So did we. We also have $500s and $2s. I think they might still make the $2s in really limited quantities.
>>58207680
>We also have $500s
I forgot about those. We haven't made those in...even longer. Almost a century, IIRC.
We stopped using 1$ and 2$ bills around the same time as the 1 000$ ones. Since them we've used coins.
