[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
ITT we pay our respects to the GREATEST NAVAL FORCE of all time
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /int/ - International

Thread replies: 88
Thread images: 19
File: freedomaintfree.jpg (5 KB, 300x168) Image search: [Google]
freedomaintfree.jpg
5 KB, 300x168
Basically we owe every part of our modern existing to these proud, these brave, these few.

US NAVAL control of all sea lanes has ensured an unprecedented period of peace, prosperity and success for all involve.

I humbly would like to thank all the Americans on this board, and all you serving sailors, semper fi you glorious devil dogs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud-at_mpGSU
>>
Anus
>>
Pearl harbor'd
>>
>>58074370
You filthy commie, show some GOD DAMN respect!
>>
>300 X 168
>5KB
you truly are an australian
>>
F
>>
>>58074237
You can be nice to the Navy when those lazy queers finally finish the fucking railguns.
>>
File: 1458919426630.jpg (855 KB, 3000x2100) Image search: [Google]
1458919426630.jpg
855 KB, 3000x2100
>>58074237

Military general or military shitposting?
>>
Sick cunts

http://youtu.be/nqFVOL7mLd4
>>
>>58074864
Well the F-35 hasn't been brought up yet so it can't be either.
>>
The F-35 is the worst mistake in US military history
>>
File: 14673220521_b8b72f83c5_b.jpg (239 KB, 1024x724) Image search: [Google]
14673220521_b8b72f83c5_b.jpg
239 KB, 1024x724
>>58074956

Who or what is missing on the graph? There's loads of brit defence commentary websites, but not a lot of yank ones.
>>
The F-35 is the best thing to ever happen in US military history
>>
>>58074864
Let the retards shitpost, atleast 2 people here can post like gents.
>>
File: ..jpg (28 KB, 386x434) Image search: [Google]
..jpg
28 KB, 386x434
>>58074237
FUG. Did that video get anyone else pumped up?
>>
F
>>
>>58075113

Let's go bomb Canada bro

RIGHT FUCKING NOW LETS GO
>>
For better or worse, the F-35 happened.
>>
OP's great grandpappy was an american sailor
>>
>>58075153
buy F-35 pls
>>
>>58075052
No one important enough to warrant inclusion. Which includes David Axe, get that literal retard off of there and stop giving his mental illnesses attention.
>>
>>58075214
Nigga they can't even afford food and electricity..

Someone literally stole like 10% of their entire GDP a year ago.
>>
>>58075225

Easy bud, I didn't make this graph.
>>
>>58075265
That makes me sad. Who would do such a thing to their own cuntmen ;_;
>>
>>58075318
>eastern yuropeans
>not born in corruption, molded by it
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTohYRUt_2c

Man, the Ohio class boomers send fucking chills up my spine

This one fucking vessel has enough power to obliterate a country

Shivers
>>
File: us_navy.jpg (3 MB, 5000x4081) Image search: [Google]
us_navy.jpg
3 MB, 5000x4081
The USN wants to install Aegis on the LPDs and LX(x)'s.

Opinions ?
>>
>>58075214
we're building our own 6 gen fighters
>>
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think North Korea is the country with the greatest naval forces, not USA.
>>
>>58075538
I think you mean land forces.
But you're wrong in either case
>>
>>58075507
I think honestly they'll need all the anti-Missile tech they can. I think China will logically follow the Russian strategy of missile saturation (as the Kirov Battlecruisers were designed to do)
>>
>>58075538
They have the greatest number of canoes and fishing boats outfitted with machine guns from the 50s.
>>
>>58075417

The US Congress is spending over $100 billion to replace them
>>
>>58075507

If you have they money... why not?

Though, can't they just give it a modified, local built Euro one and have link 16 and/or whatever new version.

These things have their own flying AEW anyway.
>>
File: 7f5.jpg (34 KB, 457x376) Image search: [Google]
7f5.jpg
34 KB, 457x376
>>58074945
>>
>>58075507
Does the US have any non-nuclear subs?
>>
>>58075750
>Though, can't they just give it a modified, local built Euro one and have link 16 and/or whatever new version.
No. You shut your socialist mouth.
>>
>>58075887
No.

Aside from possibly specialized midget subs that SEALs use for covert ops that we will never find out about.
>>
>>58075898

Can you not read? I said local built and modified, meaning NO job losses for your state Mr Congressman.
>>
>>58075887

Not for combat. They have some robotic subs for research I think. But nuclear is the core of the sub fleet.
>>
>>58075953
It might be a reality in the future as diesel-electrics become more cost effective

We can expect the boomers to all be nuclear though
>>
File: 1459183908173.jpg (14 KB, 550x467) Image search: [Google]
1459183908173.jpg
14 KB, 550x467
>>58075990
>Euro one
No
>>
>>58075750

Aegis is totally different. It's more than just comms.

It provides the US with a strategic level of awareness
>>
>>58076034

Until electrics can stay on station for 6+ month's and carry dozens and dozens of tomahawks, it won't work for the USN anytime soon
>>
>>58076227

Also, remain on station on the other side of the world without any support. Near enemy territorial water
>>
>>58076079

I hope you realise that lots of your own equipment also comes from euro derivatives? Like the LAV-25.

Good equipment is good equipment.

>>58076130

To what extend would not having Aegis fitted causes problems? I'm wanting to learn.

I know that local AAW and BMD is dependant on it. Though, carriers and Anphbs shouldn't be doing that.
>>
>>58076381
>To what extend would not having Aegis fitted causes problems?
It's literally the system on which our entire Navy's defensive capabilities are based. If you can't see how having separate system could be an issue then you're dumb.
>>
>>58076227
Check out AIP tech

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/sweden-has-a-sub-thats-so-deadly-the-us-navy-hired-it-t-1649695984

Nice little article on how it's coming along, the lower cost per unit allows a greatear fleet to be fielded, especially as the USN now focuses on the SCS and littoral waters, subs like these make more sense IMHO

The Air independent propulsion tech, currently spearheaded by Howaltswerke-Deutsche Werft (HDW) and the French "MESMA" (Module d'Energie Sous-Marine Autonome) AIP. Which can interestingly enough, be retrofitted onto existing subs.
>>
>>58076381

USN has been pushing distributed lethality for like 20 years.

The idea is to make everything that floats fight.

They believe US naval projection power should not depend on carrier groups.

If we have 300, 400, or 500 ships, then make them all fight. It's supposed to negate China's access denial strategies (which basically center around knocking out USN CVNs).
>>
>>58076299
Its understandable why SSBNs need this, but with SSNs its overkill especially considering the amount of friendly bases the USN has access to in the Pacific and SCS.

Cost effectiveness needs to be the priority for American defense
>>
>>58076495

Sad that foxtrotalpha is about to turn into shit
>>
uhh thanks i guess. all i've done is eat ramen and jerk off to anime..
>>
>>58076610
What happened?

As long as muh waifu Long war journal is still up..
>>
>>58076650

shut the fuck up nerd.
>>
>>58076493

No, I'm aware.

I'm asking for the sake of learning about Aegis.

>>58076554

Thanks, I've heard about the "distributed lethality" thing before, do you have any white papers or reports on it? I'll swap it for some other papers.
>>
>>58076670

Tyler Rogoway is leaving. He was their best writer and guy who started the blog.

Also, based Hulk Hogan has destroyed Gawker Media's finances, so expect layoffs and further blog consolidations.

io9 has already been integrated into Gizmodo.
>>
File: 1454230073617.jpg (23 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]
1454230073617.jpg
23 KB, 400x400
Can someone explain to me how the U.S just became recognized as the naval force of the world and overtook that reputation from the British?

Was it WWII?
>>
>>58076900

UK was financially, morally, population broken.

After fighting in two major wars the strain took its toll and gave way to the just birthing American empire.
>>
>>58076747

Search the USNI News site for distributed lethality.

There are also many news articles on it on defensenews etc etc


http://thediplomat.com/2015/01/the-us-navys-new-surface-warfare-strategy-distributed-lethality/
>>
>>58077052

Thanks and as promised.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/162707675/Worldwide-Equipment-Guide-Volume-3-Naval-and-Littoral-Systems

https://www.scribd.com/doc/267396243/Naval-Engineers-Journal-Volume-109-Issue-1-1997-J-F-McEachron-Subsonic-and-Supersonic-Antiship-Missiles-An-Effectiveness-and-Utility-Comparison
>>
>>58076900
Yes. UK was poor as fuck.
>>
>>58076781
Ah yeah, he does tend to jerk it a bit over new tech (but in doing so highlights problems with the whole bloated defense procurement process in which the AF must have "everything")

Just how fucking deep are Gawkers tendrils?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCGoA-dZBzo

FUCK I hate not being american

>>58076900
>recognized

Nigga they curbstomped you in the Pacific for that right

After the dust settled they had the STRONGEST surface fleet with literally all the CVs.

The Brits in contrast were crippled, economically they could not maintain a RN on parity with the USN, the Suez Canal Crisis marked the end of that politically.

Also, IJNs encounters with the RN were not favorable to the RN
>>
>>58074864
british """"""""""""""""""""""aeroplanes""""""""""""""""""
>>
>>58076900
>overtook that reputation from the British?

america didn't "take" it from the british, it was passed on from them to us through mutual agreement and cooperation. in spirit american naval hegemony is almost a carbon copy of previous british doctrines and tenets
>>
>>58077133
>Suez Canal Crisis

worse day of my life

>>58077194

Joint projects my friend.
>>
File: 1453997853911.jpg (63 KB, 600x644) Image search: [Google]
1453997853911.jpg
63 KB, 600x644
>>58076900
>Can someone explain to me how the U.S just became recognized as the naval force of the world
Gee I dunno..
>>
>>58077272
whats going on there
>>
>>58077289
That's all the sunk IJN ships in ww2

See if you can spot the Yamato
>>
>>58077289
IJN ships that were freed.
>>
File: afa67e690537bc02851ddb899f292eca.jpg (575 KB, 1600x1200) Image search: [Google]
afa67e690537bc02851ddb899f292eca.jpg
575 KB, 1600x1200
>>58077289

Just some pranks we played on the imperial Japanese fleet
>>
File: 1405451402320.jpg (619 KB, 1500x842) Image search: [Google]
1405451402320.jpg
619 KB, 1500x842
>>58077458
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hziFBOx4yqc
>>
>>58077458
>>58077523
What is the significance of this picture I'm missing that would cause two anons to have it?
>>
>>58077709
Just coincidence.

I pick that image from /k/ a good while ago and posted it because the other guy posted it in horrible quality.
>>
>>58074237
Is this bait?
>>
Navy is the gayest military branch
>>
>>58075507
>OHP's
>2 non-existent carriers
>2 non-existent LHA's
>2 non-existent Arleigh Burke's

???
>>
>>58076227
Our boomers can't and do not do that.
>>
File: average Latvian navy warship.jpg (89 KB, 634x372) Image search: [Google]
average Latvian navy warship.jpg
89 KB, 634x372
>>58078396
:^)
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2hj5USIl6M

Opinions
>>
File: 9224474422_4f15781963_b.jpg (423 KB, 1024x680) Image search: [Google]
9224474422_4f15781963_b.jpg
423 KB, 1024x680
Greatest naval force ever pic related
>>
>>58078859
LOL ITS GOT A GIANT BALL ON IT
>>
File: HMS-Duncan-Royal-Navy.jpg (657 KB, 2000x1068) Image search: [Google]
HMS-Duncan-Royal-Navy.jpg
657 KB, 2000x1068
>>58078859
>a fucking chrismas ball hat
>>
File: British Embarrassment.png (359 KB, 981x857) Image search: [Google]
British Embarrassment.png
359 KB, 981x857
>>58078859
TRIGGERED
>>
>>58074237
God bless Europe and it's colonies

Good job fatties
>>
File: 1459531899000.jpg (123 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
1459531899000.jpg
123 KB, 1024x768
>>58079545

DELEEEET
>>
File: 319Pq4MhLrL._SY300_.jpg (4 KB, 217x300) Image search: [Google]
319Pq4MhLrL._SY300_.jpg
4 KB, 217x300
>>58079044
>>
>>58079840

kek
Thread replies: 88
Thread images: 19

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.