Hey turkey, remember that time you annihilated us?
LMAO
you can annhilate my boipucci
>>57774479
TURKEY Y-YOU CAN'T SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT WITHOUT SAYING NO HOMO!
>>57774456
wtf is that color
>>57774456
it was just bantz desu
>>57775492
i want aussie cock in my ass
>>57774456
do kiwi/aussie really celebrate losing?
>>57776303
they don't celebrate losing it, they remember the ANZAC lads who lost their lives in Gallipoli, and also curse the perfidious albion for landing them here.
>this triggers the turk
>>57777284
both sides suffered over 300k
>>57777337
those casualties listed don't include illness so you might have a point there
>>57777328
I think both sides acted too gentlemanly to be triggered by each other if anythign you guys should be triggered by the brits who used you as cannon fodder desu senpai baka
>>57778041
considering that the brits suffered 4 times as many casualties than us, nah m8
>>57778156
>>57778041
also
>gentlemanly
gunning stretcher bearers isnt gentlemanly
RIP in peace John Simpson
>>57778041
alphan at it again :DDD
>>57776225
Come home Hellenic man
>hellow mr erdoilhan
>mfw father of my grandpa lost a leg to the people that bred exclusive amounts of shitposters
>mfw there is a possibility that im posting one of those's thread right now
fugg :DD
>>57779004
gib money pls
>>57779245
forgot mein face .DD
>>57779245
ben shitposter degilim osman abi
>>57774456
INCORRECT!
we caused more casualties on average, but we couldn't get anywhere, hence the failure. (kinda like the Vietnam war)
British Empire & France:
Strength: 568,000
Losses: 252,000
T*rkey:
Strength: 315,500
Losses: ~251,000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallipoli_Campaign
>>57779659
We have the same amount of casualties and your side was much stronger.
B T F O
T
F
O
>>57780954
Stupid claim.
You lost more people in regard to the deployed amount of troops.
>>57781019
Your side had:
Better equipment
More man
More materials
More food and water
and a naval blockade going on
We had:
Limited amount of equipment that was shit in quality
Less man
Less materials
Less food, and the food was shitty
our ports were blocakaded
and also Ottoman artillery was shit at the time
we still lost the same amount of troops, it doesn't matter in regards to the deployed amount.
so yeah, BTFO
>>57781254
>it doesn't matter in regards to the deployed amount
well... It does...
How can you have accurate statistics, if you cannot base them off the original?
Try again Roach.
>>57781359
If we had equal circumstances then it would have mattered, but we did not.
>>57781420
France was part of the Gallipoli campaign too.
>>57781519
You cannot get equality out of warfare. there's no flat white terrainless battlefield where two Armies can face off.
>>57779659
Are you retarded?
>>57782207
ON AVERAGE!
>>57782425
They caused more casualties on average.
>>57784134
Delet
it's 3am desu
>>57779659
> Amphibious assault with less then 3 to 1 advantage in troops
It had to go the way it went.
