>The Queen will be dead in 5-10 years.
How will Britain ever recover?
She is going to outlive us all, especially you americ-anon.
>be ameriburger
>be 46
>try to eat a vegetable
>get hearth attack
why are brits so cucked over the queen
>>57417211
Life extending treatment is 5-10 years out m8. She will never die.
![Happy-Frog-Meme-20[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hbib9N6.jpg "Happy-Frog-Meme-20[1].jpg")
>the monarchy will not be brought down in your lifetime
I'll miss the dear old slag but it'll be good for the republican movement here. No one fucking likes Chuck.
good. dark lord finally ends
>>57417351
Why Russia so cucked over blyadimir
Tennnou heika (82)
>>57417375
really? source on this
>>57417384
>republican
Fuck off yanks
When the old whore dies we will finally be able to elect our first Sheikh.
Inshaallah brothers!
>>57417384
They are shit. I will never understand the affection/nostalgia some people feel for their monarchs or past monarchs.
>>57417211
>implying
I'll die before her I reckon
>>57417351
We're not, no one really cares but there's no reason to get rid of them
It's britaboo yanks that care the most tbqh
Harry will become king and make UK great again.
>>57417574
Who gives a fuck they ain't causing any harm
There's no benefits to a Republic so stop hating and let that sweet tourist money fly in
>>57417574
>They are shit.
As is pretty much every person alive. At least they're better than most politicians.
King Charles will make Britain Science Again
>>57417597
id just be pissed of if i was a brit struggling to get a coin whilst this rich old lady sits on her savings and only contributes to "muh tourism" and all that.
>>57417497
he improved the economy greatly. still it is a problem i agree little stralia
>>57417597
Not true.
https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/09/08/monarchy-here-stay/
the queen is immortal
shes never going to die, keep dreaming peasants!
>>57417497
Because he knows that Russians are best motivated by playing on their envy and spitefulness, mixed with a healthy dose of fear.
>>57417683
Well she brings in more to our economy then she takes out, she doesn't have to pay taxes but she does
Doesn't really affect us
>>57417692
>Muh yougov
No one under the age of 60 takes an actual interest
>>57417760
Wrong again and meme if you want, YouGov is a legitimate polling entity.
>>57417856
And if I was asked that I would answer 'good'
Doesn't mean I give the slightest fuck about the queen
>>57417912
That's your own take, just because you'd answer something a certain way doesn't mean others would.
And I can keep throwing stats at you which say otherwise to what you originally said.
https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/2973/Support-for-monarchy-is-at-all-time-high.aspx
I don't know if you're aware Amerifriend, but they can actually elect another one. It's been going on for over a thousand years or so
projection: a royal family member will marry and have children with a Paki
>>57418264
Won't happen
>pro-tip: see Princess Diana
I'll become the King of Great Britain!!
>>57417211
>drink tea all day
>become a hero of uk, worshipped by many
care to explain?
>>57417574
Tourism buxs and politically neutral dipomats. We would gain nothing getting rid of them other than your own pride you neckbeard
>>57418264
And then that family member will "accidentally" crash in a tunnel.
But they still have Kate don't they
I like Kate, she is pretty
>his monarch let the country lose its empire and progressively go to shit
Holy shit , at least we had the decency to behead them so they wouldn't see the decay
We'll cease this chance to take back rightful clay.
>>57419619
what empire?
>>57417574
she's infinitely preferable to our politicians t b h and if you don't think so you're fucking deluded
>>57419781
That's because she's not a politician
![hqdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/DBAVdN8.jpg "hqdefault[1].jpg")
>>57419619
>his country bankrupted itself fighting Britain throwing money and manpower at the American Revolutionary War
>the peasants ended up so poor they killed the royal family
She sold all of our colonies.
Can't wait for Charles to make Britian great again.
![hqdefault[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nHCvkwh.jpg "hqdefault[2].jpg")
>>57418593
>politically neutral
>>57417211
That's when our time has come to an end and our island vanishes.
>>57420050
>sold
you mean give away for free?
>>57417500
yes
>>57417574
it's called culture mate, just because you were born in some desert shithole where culture is literally defined by a mud hut doesn't mean we have to give up ours
>>57420137
Sold to the Jews, yeah.
she'll live till like 120, reptilians don't die like humans
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2IO5ifWKdw
>>57420367
I'm glad someone posted a rebuttal to that dumb fag
>>57420181
what is australian culture
>>57420465
I usually don't mind CGP Grey too much, but this video was blatantly wrong.
I'd love to hear what most British subjects would say to the video response I linked.
>>57420367
>He didn't own the land
>He stole it by being king
By that retarded logic nobody ever legitimately owned anything, as it was all taken by somebody at some point or another.
>>57417211
Why do Americans seem to care more about the British queen than the Brits themselves?
>>57420769
this tbqh lads tbvh
>>57420769
>>57420845
Point is he took it because he was king. He didn't buy it or even really win it in conquest, he simply claimed it from his supposed divine right to rule you.
If Cameron now declared that Surrey and Lancashire were his own personal land would you simply say, well he took it, someone else had it before him but we can't think about it too much or we'd never figure out who had it first?
>>57420962
the king is fucking dank
fucc off johnny foreigner
She'll hang on as long as she can just so Charles stays as little as possible.
You will enjoy this OP. Some royal photagraper used photoshop. The funny part are the comments. The britts are adoring her, saying she is so amazing. Sort by best rated comments.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3182465/Her-Majesties-Queens-Royal-photographer-s-unique-multiple-portraits-based-van-Dyck-s-legendary-Charles-I.html
>>57420769
Even more retarded logic. It's first come first serve m8. If anyone owned the land it was the native populace living on it when before some warlord rode in on a horse and enslaved everyone.
If we're supposed to live in a modern society based on morals and fairness, then a monarchy living in luxury on the back of slaughter, war and oppression is perverse.
>>57420962
>He didn't buy it or even really win it in conquest,
His family did win it.
>If Cameron now declared that Surrey and Lancashire were his own
1. He would have to win it first
2. We don't live in the middle ages now and that isn't accepted behavior.
The family got the land fairly, during a time when everybody was competing over it. You can't retroactively say because things don't work that way now that it isn't theirs anymore.
>>57420769
Who the fuck owns anything. You are literally going about over 1000 years to saying 'THAT MAN WAS NASTY'
History happened fucking deal with it
>>57421097
>then a monarchy living in luxury on the back of slaughter, war and oppression is perverse.
I don't think you understand how feudalism worked mate. The king belonged to the most powerful family and protected the country. Everybody fought to be king with the most able family winning. The king in turn held together the country together and protected the realm. Fuedalism was a necessity of the time, and if not for the royal family(s) the UK may not have ever existed / be a part of another state / divided into many other states, whatever.
lmao what a joke of a country
>>57421409
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Sorry_Day
all people who think monarchies are outdated and want to remove current monarchs should be killed on sight tb.h fa.m
>>57420367
Is this guy retarded? He's equating potential revenue with cost. All on the basis that the monarchy doesn't rightfully own the land.
>>57421478
>go from being a grand, world relevant repbulic to being an irrelevant meme-onarchy
>>57421434
Anybody can make up a holiday that isn't actually recognized mate.
>>57421281
I understand exactly how feudalism worked, and the remnants of it are incompatible with modern society. It was a time of brutality, oppression, greed, servitude and massive disparity in wealth. Not much has changed really. You talk about "protecting" the country and holding it together? Don't make me laugh. They were protecting their own interests and power, nothing more, while the vast majority of people were poor as fuck. The people in power were ruthless and possibly psychotic, power hungry murderers who were delusional enough to think they had special rights granted by a magical sky wizard. You ideas on monarchy and medieval times seems to be based on romance and Disney films.
>>57421557
We were greater as a kingdom then a republic, you know nothing about our history. Our republic was let by some business owning pocketfillers who only cared for themselves, not for the country, not for the companies which made us great.
>>57421677
so why don't you want a monarchy exactly?
>>57421677
>They were protecting their own interests and power, nothing more, while the vast majority of people were poor as fuck
I don't know if you noticed mate but England happened to be one of the better off during and after the medieval period, and it's primarily the monarchs who are responsible for that. You keep saying it was horrible by modern standards without considering the reality of the times. Countries couldn't survive without those "psychotic, power hungry murderers".
>>57421677
>By modern standards fuedalism was bad, therefore all monarchs are inherently evil.
>>57417211
>Queen dead in 5.-10 years
>His son dead in 13-17
>>57421677
>muh evil authority figures
>>57421983
>queen
>his son
u wot m8
![150903-queen-elizabeth-jpo-712a_80834894bceed6fc1635f6a6ac96ab46.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/WQmDJkX.jpg "150903-queen-elizabeth-jpo-712a_80834894bceed6fc1635f6a6ac96ab46.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000[1].jpg")
>>57422068
You are telling me this is not a man?
>>57417211
>Everyone loves Elizabeth
>Everyone loves William
>YOU JUST KNOW that people will love George
>If we ever become a Republic it has to be under Charles because everyone hates him
>tfw the longer the bitch reigns the shorter Charles' reign will be
REEEE
>>57420529
avin' a pie and a giggle m8. oh and GOON TREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>57422151
stop the bullu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA7Uf6fP1Vg
>>57422220
>Unironically wanting your country to become a republic
wew
>>57417211
they be fine
>>57422220
wanting to live in "united republic of england scotland wales and northern ireland"
literally commie tier
![laughing-bonobo-360x240[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/BwjacyW.jpg "laughing-bonobo-360x240[1].jpg")
>>57421900
>he thinks feudalism ended
Poor, misguided pleb. Enjoy an entire life working like a dog to make the rich even richer. The PM on the UK is a relative of the Queen. So much has changed, right?
>>57422401
>The PM on the UK
Foreigner detected, gtfo diaspora.
>>57420741
>I'd love to hear what most British subjects would say to the video response I linked.
From any legal standpoint the crown rightfully owns the land. So to base your entire argument on the revenue lost by not owning that land is retarded. Also his calculation was based on the land being re-inherited every 20 years which is far from reality to say the least.
>>57421733
I want to buy a house and actually own the land, not pay through the nose for possession of a "freehold" that means I only own an "estate" which is on the Crown's land.
>>57422401
m8 do you even know what feudalism is.
>>57422401
>Why are other people rich and successful when I'm not!
Kill yourself
>>57422220
Never thought about it this way, interesing.
I wonder if Charles will actually attract less controversy as the King.
At least Chales will be king. He is already a gold mine of comedy just as the royal heir, I can only imagine how great it will be when he is king.
>>57422686
can't be the only one noticing this
>>57422538
It takes one hell of a cuck to be satisfied to be a subject rather then a free man.
>>57422537
The basic structure is still in place
>>57422819
You are actually. They look nothing alike.
>>57422929
Nobody living in civilization is truly free, ending the Monarchy would change nothing. learn to be happy with what you are instead of complaining about what you aren't.
>>57422483
From any legal standpoint the crown rightfully owns ALL the land. You do not own the Crown's land, you "hold" it. The land on which your house is built is the Crown's. You do not own it, you have exclusive access to it.
I'd like to see how you would react if the Queen tried to use this legal ownership to move people/demolish buildings etc. I'd say we'd all become republics pretty quick, and you monarchists would change you tune.
>>57417211
>current year
>fake monarchism
>>57423012
I'd argue that tribes living in remote jungles that have never encountered modern civilisations are free. Living off the land in small groups, not being ruled by anyone, not being taxed or governed by a rich elite.
>>57422537
All land ownership where Elizabeth is Head of State is merely a holding in accordance with medieval/feudal law.
>>57423246
If they live in a group they beholden to that group, and fighting against that group obviously wouldn't end well for them.
>>57423165
>legal standpoint
so no difference practically then.
>>57417316
*Leaps from the bushes and snatches you up with a bug net*
Aha! A new flag for my collection! A fine specimen indeed.
