Is /pol/ right?
- Home
- Board: /int/ - International
- Reading: Is /pol/ right?
Is /pol/ right?
>>57200793
>/pol/
>>57200793
Is that /pol/ar bear right, you mean? Haha
>>57200793
Most of the time yes
>>57200840
So then when are they wrong?
>>57200882
Ebola, 2012 election
>>57200793
No it's shit.
Now 50 % of the posts are about Donald trump, I don't hate the guy but his cock suckers are ruining it.
>>57200882
Almost all the time. Gotta love their cherry picked memefographics though. They're so retarded it's hilarious.
>autistic people from all over the political spectrum post their
>the right opinion is eventually posted on a topic
Well duh.
>>57201024
>implying you can disprove this
>>57201024
Mad, Tyrone Lopez ?
>>57201048
>4/5 on Goodreads
dropped
>>57201118
Why? I know fuck all about goodreads. /lit/ recommended me the book.
>>57201048
>mfw I'm convinced
I want to get off Sequoyah's Wild Ride
>>57200793
/pol/ is never right.
Yea.
Life, universe....
It's never like 100% something.
There are pros and cont.
Truth and lies.
Ying yang.
Jews and whites.
Ehe.
>>57200793
/pol/ is certainly right, but most of their """""facts""""""" can be disproven.
They're pretty retarded.
>>57201208
>taking advice from /lit/
>>57201379
So I take it you're just a /pol/tard using memes to avoid reading things from across the aisle so to speak.
>>57201428
If I was from /pol/ wouldn't I be praising "1491: New Revelations About the Americas Before Columbus?"
I'm kinda mad they substituted the fat hate and world politics threads for Trump 24/7 desu
>>57201638
>praising
But you said "dropped" here >>57201118
>>57201780
What the fuck man?
>>57201048
I see some of the connections but that's some extreme autism. Incas weren't the only Siberians
