>Watch BBC- produced historical show about Mary, Queen of Scots
>She has two black handmaidens
Weren't Royal handmaidens taken from noblewomen? Was 1500s Scotland brimming with black nobles?
>Watching the BBC
According to BBC there were blacks in the court of king Arthur
>>57124969
she's qt
BIG
BLACK
COCKS
![mead-hamilton-1200[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9FBJF7z.jpg "mead-hamilton-1200[1].jpg")
Diversity not only changes a nation's future, it also changes a nation's past.
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/03/29/hamilton-casting-call-non-white/
>>57124969
THAS RITE !!!
Welcome to 2016! Where historical accuracy is less important than the feelings of minorities!
Welcome to 2016! Where every blockbuster is a remake, but don't worry, this time they made sure to include women, or so much CGI that you're watching a cartoon.
Welcome to 2016! Where you are allowed to cut off your dick, get tits installed, and take hormones to become a woman, but don't even think about smoking marijuana, or taking steroids to make yourself stronger!
Welcome to 2016! Welcome refugees! Welcome your new womxn leader! Welcome to idiocracy 2.0!
>>57125034
Fuck off lad Merlin was sick
possibly
there were black legionnaires stationed on hadrian's wall, so it's not that hard to believe
>>57125792
This is why we need Trump he will make everything better :)
>>57125034
King Arthur is a fictional character who appeared in the works of dozens of different authors. He's whatever you want him to be.
In general, I wish we'd get to a place where the race of an actor was less relevant.
Hell, Linda Hunt won an oscar for playing a male Chinese dwarf.
>>57125792
agreed, but I don't get how smoking weed makes you stronger
>>57126058
I feel like by the 1500's, those black legionnaires' descendants would've probably interbred with the natives enough that they would look like any other Englishman.
>>57124969
More importantly Why did they cast mary as a latin shitskin or something? She had fair features. Not a tan and poo skin eyes
>>57126211
It has historical fundament and it's connected to the Alans
Nigger
>>57126376
Sorry I didn't mean for the steroids and weed to intertwine like that. Was a heat of the moment post brah.
Don't you dare take steroids to become stronger, or smoke weed to relax.
Better?
>>57126058
>there were black legionnaires stationed on hadrian's wall, so it's not that hard to believe
No there wasn't m8. They found remains of auxiliaries from modern day syria but only like a single chohort and it confuses the fuck out of experts why the Romans would send a syrian cohort there. But very few in number. Most Roman auxilaries in Britain were from Gaul and Germania because they were close geographically and culturally with the Britons, but they also found a sizeable number of peoples from around the black sea like modern day Ukraine. Only a single cohort of syrians has been found. There were no black people in Britain until much, much later.
>>57126582
much better
though weed has wiggled it's way into progressive pseudo spiritual and burnout types, at it's core it is quite the benign drug if you don't make a big deal out of it
>>57126211
>muh Fictional character
So is Mohammad. Are you okay with depicting him on national television? Would you approve of casting the buddah as a white man?
>>57124969
>>57124969
>Reign is an American historical fantasy romance television series following the early years of Mary, Queen of Scots living in France
The BBC doesn't produce that show.
>>57126058
I saw a show in the excavation if one of the forts and the one legion were Batavians (basically Dutchmen). I'll need some substantial proofs.
>>57124969
Mansa Musa was white!
>>57124969
Diversity quotas
>>57125792
>but don't even think about smoking marijuana
except in the land of milk bags with pm dude weed
>>57127036
t. nigel akakwakanoube
Soon queen Mary could be portrait as a nigger.
for example - Orpheus portrait by Hallmark
>>57130994
and Orpheus how it's considered to be
>>57126937
Mohammad is also pretty hard to nail down as a historical figure, but I believe the traditions there are a lot more specific than with King Arthur. I personally don't care how you depict him.
And we know far less even about what Gautama looked like, thought he was described [like Jesus] as looking like a typical member of his clan. In Buddhist tradition, it's considered perfectly appropriate to depict the Buddha as a member of your own culture, and that's why we have Japanese Buddhas as well as Hellenic Persian Buddhas.
Again, I don't care. I thought Alec Guinness and Anthony Quinn did fine jobs in Lawrence of Arabia.
>>57131147
>Who cares it's fiction
There is Just as much tradition in Arthurian legends as Mohammad's hadiths and the Quaran. Historia Regum Britanniae and a Matter of Britan and a plethora of other works that will go down in the ages as a part of British identity. See context is important here, you can do what you want with fiction obviously it's fictional but when it comes to things like King arthur who has a long history of being a Briton in the British isles and abroad it get's sensitive. I don't want to see a white buddah or white Mohammad and I'm white. I do agree with those stupid SJW when it comes to white washing and reverse. Some people only use the "It's only fiction" cop out until someone comes along writing about hitler as a protagonist killing Jews that transform into lizards but it's labeled as fiction.
>>57125792
Did you hear the new KFC commercials will have a black Colonel Sanders?
http://www.businessinsider.com/kfc-cast-its-first-black-colonel-sanders-2016-3
>>57131937
That's just genius marketing. Blacks are their target demographic at KFC.
>>57132026
Also, redhead from Wendy's is being changed to a Hispanic girl this summer.
I would love to see a movie made about mlk or mohammed ali and have a white guy cast for the lead. At very least I would settle for a light skinned black for mlk and a paki for ali.
>>57132499
>Also, redhead from Wendy's is being changed to a Hispanic girl this summer.
That ones sad, the red headed wendys girl is nostalgia for me because my grandma would take me to wendys when I got good grades back in elementary school.
>>57124969
Brits are more cucked than even us when it comes to vastly overrepresenting blacks in tv/movies.
>>57137801
good luck, my white brother
>>57124969
>Guinevere in merlin was black
I literally see more black people in 10 minutes of TV than in 6 months.
It's pathetic
I thought westerners were supposed to suck the BBC, not watch it.
>>57137886
6 months irl*
btw here's guinevere
>>57124969
Where is she from?
>>57137917
Britbongs do both desu.
>>57126058
No land ruled by romans had black fucking africans in it.
Tell me all about them sub saharan provinces.
(I know that you are not serious, I am merely developing on your point)
>>57139690
Didn't the Romans control parts of Northern Africa? I know that area was partly intermixed, but there would have still been black people there.
>>57125792
>you can take hormones to become a different sex but not to get stronger
You know, I've never thought of it like that, but it makes no sense, they are literally the SAME FUCKING HORMONES. I guess strong men are haram in today's western society
>>57140243
>I know that area was partly intermixed, but there would have still been black people there.
They weren't black people. They were and amalgamation of people from the middle east, native north Africans(who basically look the same) plus admixture from the hundreds of years of and Greek and phocean colonists.
>>57125792
I don't understand why weed and steroids are unacceptable while cigarettes and alcohols aren't.
None of them are "worse" than other. They have equal amount of chances to fuck you up.
How long until hollywood produces a movie with black Lincoln? Or a movie about queen Elizabeth II played by a indian women?
I would seriously watch that desu. too funny
Pureblood Celts were naturally swarthy.
See Tom Jones
HOL UP
*throws log*
>>57140829
No, stop this meme. Brythonic celts were described by the Romans and the greeks before them as red or light brown headed and fair. Iberian migration is responsible for "Black Irish" the the welsh.
I mean, whenever you have these kinds of threads, there's always that faggot who says it don't matter since "fictional character"(even when the character is actually a historic figure), but as soon as a non-white character becomes white or something, they go full on ape-shit.
This topic would be less bothersome for me if the changes made on the character weren't a move made to stroke the cocks of SJWs, but we all know that's the reason why they drastically change a well-established decades old characters.
Brit tv shows force black people into everything. Since London is fulled with inmigrants, they have to make even medieval englands as "diverse".
For example, I know it's not an historical tv show, but in Doctor who, when they go to the middle ages, 1 out of 4 extras is black
>>57126058
we wuz legionaries
>>57140899
SO YOU BE SAYIN
*sews kilt*
>>57141075
Yeah it's retarded. Surprised there isn't a paki in a burka as her hand maiden
>Why are you trying to put black actors out of work anon? Literally no one cares about your racist bullshit anon. Wake up. Its 2016.
>>57125034
We wuz aliums n' shieet
>>57141665
>I'm trying to push black actors out of hollywood and away from us racist crackers. They should start their own hollywood, do you not think them capable? Racist
>>57132499
>Changing the logofrom a redheaded girl
Proofs?
>>57132724
The changed the logo back in 2008 or so, it's still the redheaded girl but she went from sort of like an outline white to pink
>>57126058
i am going to assume subtle joke/troll
>>57142129
In some states it already has
>>57124969
WE
WUZ
HANDMAIDENS
BBC means big black cock
>>57124969
well, who else did you expect to teach whitey how to bathe themselves?
the wealthy, noble and charitable empires of africa sent out these representatives to the barbaric societies of europe to teach them the ways of hygiene, science, literature, arts, engineering and pooing in the loo
>>57142947
>black ginger
>>57124969
WE WORE KILTS AN SHIEEET
![B_n9_XfUsAAHMgJ[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/K99uuOJ.jpg "B_n9_XfUsAAHMgJ[1].jpg")
>>57143859
>Was 1500s Scotland brimming with black nobles?
shhh...they're not suppost to know the truth
>>57126787
Excellent sources, and btw you must be one of those pan-Amazighs who literally think the original Berbers were white and are indigenous to NA...haha...
>watch bbc shows on netflix and aus tv since we are cucks for british content
>99% of contemporary shows are 50% black male, a token white female who is the love interest of one of the blacks, a few mulattos and maybe one actual british person who is usually the spastic geek of the group
i wonder how triggered brits get when watching shows like neighbours or home and away where everyone is blonde and blue eyed
>>57144708
>Perhaps the most notably 'specialised' auxiliary regiment in Britain was the 500 strong 'quingenary' cohort of Syrian archers. "Cohors Prima Hamiorum Sagittaria", a unit of bowmen recruited from the Hamian tribesmen from the city of Hama in the Orontes valley in northern Syria, one of only two whole regiments of archers known to have been stationed in Britain. The other being a reference in the Notitia Dignitatum of the 'Numerus Syrorum Saggitariorum' - 'The Company of Syrian Archers' from Malton (Derventio Brigantium) in Yorkshire. This could well be the last incarnation of the former unit.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6778777-britannia
Published by the university of Wesleyan. Go ahead though and post a wikipidea article or the daily mail. This is still the gold standard for Roman auxilaries in Britain. I'm not a pan-Amazigh or whatever the fuck that is. You must be an Afro-centrist who wants to change history.
>>57142129
Nit the logo the girl in the commercials
>>57139690
That's the most completely ignorant statement considering it's been proven that the Roman Empire was multi-ethnic at all levels. If you want sources I'd be happy to provide them because you're blatant bigotry is causing you to not see the truth, like most bigots on this website.
>>57145036
Post them. We know Romans had Auxiliaries from other races, what you're saying though is Idiotic and you don't know the Modus operandi of the Romans. The fact there was Syrian auxiliaries and Ukrainian auxiliaries in Britain is confusing to experts in the first place but it has been confirmed. There were no black people in Britain until probably a few hundred years ago and very few until recently.
>>57143084
For you.
>>57145128
>We know Romans had Auxiliaries from other races
You just admitted to the point I was making. From your tone you seem to think you're some expect on Romans, and the confusion you have is clear, you seem to believe Syria was fully Arabized during the early centuries AD, this is where you're truly mistaken which is why I brough up the pan-Amazigh comment
>>57145128
>[There were no black people in Britain] until probably a few hundred years ago and very few until recently.
Prove it.
>>57144826
I can barely watch British crime shows and drama anymore without getting triggered by the forced diversity
Aren't blacks like 3% of the UK's population? Why are you so cucked by them?
>>57145685
>Aren't blacks like 3% of the UK's population? Why are you so cucked by them?
this
I can understand it in USA but christ, why does every UK show have like 70% non-white characters?
>>57145587
>You just admitted to the point I was making
This is what happens when Idiots read only what they want to read. Also Syria is west Asia you moron. They were bronzed with dark hair and dark eyes. Also no, Caracalla's generals who fought the Parthians said they looked like the people from North African. They weren't black. Have you really bought into the "Carthage was black" maymay?
![Lilly_Hannibal[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/iHg7ByU.jpg "Lilly_Hannibal[1].jpg")
>>57145846
das rite
>>57145671
The onus is on you. However I read about the British Isles and I know the first few black Africans came to Britain the the 16th century as England had ties to Castille as part of an entourage with Catherine. However the first actual sizable black population came in the 17th century. Something called colonialism.
>>57145846
MENA has always had an African/Afro-Arab presence. Who we call Arabs today originate from Southern Arabia who then migrated to the Levant to begin the maritime civilization we call the Phoenicians which like all other Empires was multi-ethnic.
You're a racist it's clear, and I don't just throw that word around at people, judging from your tone and statements it's evident you're denying the existence of Africans outside of Africa, and this is the type of thinking that is ingrained into people like you who then get unreasonably upset when someone mentions an African in Britain.
>>57146049
You made the statement the onus is upon you to prove. Can you prove Africans WEREN'T in Britain during the early centuries CE?
>>57146095
I'm upset you're playing fast and loose with History to fit your agenda. I admit blacks came to Britain at one point. Also no, what we can prove is that North Africans came to Britain with the Romans but we can't prove any of them were black. The Romans were great at descriptions, even if some were exaggerated amongst their enemies and the Romans described Syria and North Africa as bronzed people almost Italian in appearance. If you can prove otherwise with something published I'm all ears. Also the Phoenicians were semetic, likely to have migrated from modern day Lebanon.
>>57146173
You made the statement there were. I proved with actual published sources you can check out that the most exotic auxiliary found in Britain were Syrians. Not Black Africans.
