If your country isn't in the top 5 most powerful contries in europe then its is essentially a non country
>inb4 butthurt frenchies crying fake statistics and anglo propaganda
Literally a we wuz response
>>56868319
m8 last time I checked the USA wasnt in Europe
4~9 don't even have a navy find this a bit rude to be honest
>>56868335
our military bases are
>The United States is a non-country
>China is a non-country
>Russia is a non-country
>>56868287
HUm... Greece has more tanks and planes than germany and italy and poland and czech republic and austria combined...
>>56868287
Hmm, I would like to know what kind of list I'm looking at.
>Peerindex
Oh alright, let's google that.
>PeerIndex is a London-based company providing social media analytics based on footprints from use of major social media services (currently[when?] Facebook, LinkedIn, Quora, and Twitter).
>London
>Social media
Just how is this relevant?
>>56868319
>If your country isn't in the top 5 most powerful contries in europe then its is essentially a non country
This essentially implies that every non-european country is a non-country. Please learn how to use the language which is named after your shit hole.
>>56868287
The statistics are fake, fucking anglo propangada
>>56868287
Poland strong
>>56868414
>In Europe
>EUROPE
>E U R O P E
How come spain is that low? Nah
>>56868465
its www.globalfirepower.com
the statistics in the pic are from 2015 tho
>>56868287
P W R
W
R
>>56868526
>English
>ENGLISH
>E N G L I S H
>>56868287
>>56868414
All of those are correct
>>56868526
>If your country isn't in the top five most powerful countries in Europe,
>Then it is essentially a non-country.
Learn how to use your own language, Hamish.
>>56868598
What did he mean by this?
WE STRONG
>>56868287
>Ukraine
>>56868639
The sentence in your OP isn't constructed correctly to exclude countries that aren't in Europe...
>>56868630
The sentence implies that.
Obviously if i'm showing a localized ranking for Europe I am only referring to European contries
>>56868287
>pwrindx
>>56868652
It used to be much higher.
I wonder what happened
>>56868652
When you get cucked out of three provinces by Eastern "Ukrainians" and drunk slavic "volunteers" in a hybrid war, you are in no way powerful.
Also, their literally poorer per capita than Nigerians.
>>56868707
A certain someone felt like taking back a few gifts.
>>56868769
no no no that never happened.
Russia innocent, they dindu nuffin, they a good boy. Ukraine fought and lost to itself. Ukraine gave crimea away cuz they such good friends with russia
>>56868526
>In London
>LONDON
>L
>O
>N
>D
>O
>N
>>56868557
The GFP list makes use of over 50 factors in our in-house formula to determine a given nation's Power Index ("PwrIndx") score. This provides the final ranking while also allowing smaller, more technologically-advanced, nations to compete with larger, lesser-developed ones. Some bonuses and penalties are added for refinement that, in the end, we hope presents an unbiased look into the potential conventional military strength of a world power.
>Military strength
I get that we're not entirely done with wars and that another world war isn't completely off the table, but this isn't a valid way to reduce a complete country to some digits in order to compare it to other countries. The way I see it, we'll have to work together in future wars and if for some reason we fight against eachother, the only thing waiting for us is mutually assured destruction.
>Note that nuclear capability is not taken into account
>>56868287
>top 5 has-beens
wew lad
>>56868598
>he can't understand contextual clues
t. Literal Autist
>>56868967
Why would nuclear capability be taken into account?
>>56868985
>top 1 never-was
>>56868817
Who are you quoting?
Anyway, they got cucked out of like 5 million people and three provinces and now are living in a shattered economy with a broken political system.
>>56868287
We are the strongest country per capita
>>56869022
>why would the weapon that has kept WW3 from happening be taken into account
Idk senpai
>>56869022
What's the point of having a large military if you don't have to defend yourself? If there are no wars then you're just spending money on something you don't need. If you're going to war in this day and age, it will probably be against some third world shithole and if it's not, it's just a waiting game until someone will eventually launch the missiles.
polish military history is even more embarrassing than ours will they ever come back from this
>>56869045
Russians say the darnest things
Hence the 'proofs' meme
>>56869089
Exactly, its a deterrant. When a country wants to invade another country they wont start by nuking everything cause there will be nothing left to take
>Netherweak
>>56869149
>implying
Wheres that pole in sweden that always posts wikipedia battle screenshots when you need him
>>56869200
>ceased to exist
>TWICE
>W
>I
>C
>E
>>56869221
m8 if the netherlands was attacked by 3 empires on all sides simultaneously then i doubt that we would be having this conversation
>this thread
>>56869270
we were attacked by france and england at the same time in their glory days and were never annexed
>>56869022
because we would beat you if it were
>>56869344
But nuclear weapons have nothing to do with conventional military strength
>>56869330
m8 thats 2 not 3. Also I dont think that the netherlands existed for long enough to be exposed to any danger in the long term.
>>56869423
>Also I dont think that the netherlands existed for long enough to be exposed to any danger in the long term.
what did he mean by this
>>56869363
indeed, they are more powerful than any conventional military strength, which is why I think it should be taken in account
let's say one country with a very large army but no nukes tries to invade a country with nukes but a very small army. if the country with nukes manages to launch them before the ennemy enters its territory I think the victory would be easy
>>56868287
Dafuq is this based on ? Spain is way more relevant than Switzerland.
And imo germans got a strongest economy and deserve to be above us.
>>56869541
Yeah, however the ranking is for conventional military strength
>>56869449
Idk, dont feel like replying desu
>>56869541
That would only make all your neighbors an enemy. You may win the war and lose the country
>>56869270
Good thing that will never happen.
And if it did, it would probably be 3 nations outside of NATO, and you know what that means. :>)
>e*ropoors
>>56869627
That's why this shit is biased and worthless.
Fuck off now, USA's dominion.
>>56868287
>failed state Cuckraine
Also, Poland should be in at least no. 3
>>56868287
>7
hahahha, how?
you Eurocucks must be really fucking sad cunts to be worse than us.
Czech word for war is the same as the word for doing fuckall and eating popcorn on a fucking couch while watching movies.
Being worse than us is a fucking disgrace.
>>56868287
>6
>Ukraine
LOL
O
L
>>56868287
>Caliphate of the Eternal Anglo
>Literally Algerian frogs
>Fickistan
>We wuz romanz mamma mia land
>bolan :DDD
No wonder Europe is going to shit.
>>56868335
Our conquests are perfidious Albion
>>56870234
t. Roetgen Van Nickeldtern aka the butthurt
>>56868510
Poland scared of Russia
>Britain
>More powerful than us
