[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Industrial & agricultural efficiency in Anarchist Spain
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /int/ - International

Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 1
File: cnt-hail-the-heroes[1].jpg (68 KB, 599x800) Image search: [Google]
cnt-hail-the-heroes[1].jpg
68 KB, 599x800
As Eddie Conlon states in 'The Spanish Civil War: Anarchism in Action':

> If you didn't want to join the collective you were given some land but only as much as you could work yourself. You were not allowed to employ workers. Not only production was affected, distribution was on the basis of what people needed. In many areas money was abolished. People come to the collective store (often churches which had been turned into warehouses) and got what was available. If there were shortages rationing would be introduced to ensure that everyone got their fair share. But it was usually the case that increased production under the new system eliminated shortages.

> In agricultural terms the revolution occurred at a good time. Harvests that were gathered in and being sold off to make big profits for a few landowners were instead distributed to those in need. Doctors, bakers, barbers, etc. were given what they needed in return for their services. Where money was not abolished a 'family wage' was introduced so that payment was on the basis of need and not the number of hours worked.

> Production greatly increased. Technicians and agronomists helped the peasants to make better use of the land. Modern scientific methods were introduced and in some areas yields increased by as much as 50%. There was enough to feed the collectivists and the militias in their areas. Often there was enough for exchange with other collectives in the cities for machinery. In addition food was handed over to the supply committees who looked after distribution in the urban areas.

How much of these claims are supported by other primary and secondary sources?

If these claims are true, do they damage the notion that non-hierarchical forms of organisation in industry, agriculture etc. are innately inefficient?
>>
Wrong board, thought I was on /his/
>>
>>56689701
/his/ is shit anyway
>>
>>56689632
>distribution was on the basis of what people needed
How on earth do they calculate what someone "needs"? What's stopping them from taking what they want?
>>
>>56690162
Who are "they"? The whole point of anarchism is for there to be no central leadership
>>
>>56689701
you make some very good points op, but you failed to take into account niggers and cucks
>>
>>56690230
So if there's no leadership how is it worked out what people need? What if someone says they need more than the other person?
>>
>>56690294
People formed small, local democracies. They would compromise.
>>
>>56690363
But if there's an argument, who resolves it? Leaders will naturally emerge in these situations
>>
>>56690046
Why?
>>
>>56690799
ruined by /pol/ and shitposters, was god of tier for the first months now there is no point in going to /his/ over /int/
>>
The production rised because the land was owned by big landowners that didnt exploit as much as they could. Anarchy was not more efficient,they just used more resources.
>>
>>56690756
bosses =/= leaders
>>
>>56690839
Don't see that much /pol/ shitposting there these days, tbqh.
They probably realized that other people require more than a couple of infographs and sourceless statistics to have proper discussion with.
>>
>>56690974
Apparently there aren't any bosses because it's anarchy! Help me out here Mexico I don't understand
>>
>>56691452
yeah

the idea is that there are leaders, not bosses

but there still were people bossing around people who did not wanted to conform to their anarchical way of acting, it is know anarchist killed people aswell
>>
>>56691605
That's why I don't like this idea.

If you have leaders then they need to be constrained by rules, otherwise you get corruption and violence. Since there are always going to leaders in any community, anarchy will not work well.
>>
>>56691711
>create a state
>just don't call it a state

its anargy :DDDDD


the only anarchist ideology that works is individualist or egoist one, but those are more of a phylosophical stance tbqhwy
Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.