If this is an issue that is openly debated in your country, it basically deserves to be in a civil war.
>>56647601
Why some parts are so heavily pixelated?
>>56647601
If it's described with an English word only, it's a meme non-issue. Manspreading, fatshaming etc.
Don't understand how you came to that conclusion but things like this are only "heavily debated" among certain online communities.
>>56647601
Doing that should be illegal everywhere
>>56647601
but he would crash his balls otherwise
>>56647929
mansprider is only a problem for people who can't be bothered to solve their own problems
it's one of those non-issues made up just to irritate people
>>56648008
>beta
>anime watcher
It checks out.
>>56647601
if women understood what was between our legs they'd understand why we spread our legs when we sit.
>>56647601
Anyone who has their legs spread like that is a cunt, but I don't think that this is a wide spread problem.
>>56647601
No, because it's widely accepted that if you do it you're a tremendous asshole. Nobody cares if you do it when the place is empty besides a few fringe loonies, but there's always some, no matter the subject.
t. guy in a city with a crowded public transport system
>>56647929
>there's a word to name this
Not a public debate thing but anyone irl would tell that cunt to close his legs so other people can sit more confortably.
>>56648008
>not having testicles
>>56648571
>being male
>>56648774
>Pretending to be female on the internet
>>56647829
OP saved the picture before it fully loaded.
>>56649052
That's not even possible, the browser downloads the images saved.
>>56649601
OP screenshotted the picture before it was fully loaded*
I now consciously do this on trains to any feminist who might see me
It's not an issue anywhere but in the US.
They also managed to turn it into an issue about sexism.
>>56647601
Funny how blokes never try to do this to me when there's not enough room kek cunt thinks he can get away with it cos it's birds
>>56647601
I don't get it
What white people problem is this
>>56647601
The two orientals don't seem to mind.
>>56648374
>I don't think this is a wide spread
=]
>>56647601
No really. There's a range that's accepted, outwith it you're just taking up seats. This guy, for example, is taking up more space than he needs. This is rude. A woman who takes two seats, one for her and one for a bag, is just as rude.
If there's a huge row of empty seats I often do it
I actually triggered some SJWs with some good old Christian rhetoric and pointed them out on their sexism and racism.
qt on the left
>>56650975
story time
>>56650829
I have big balls, m8. I need enough room for them.
>>56647962
This
why is it always manlets that do this?
>sit in train
>smaller guy sits next to me
>literally forces his leg into mine sitting in a split
>>56647601
why is this even an issue when anyone who lives in nyc knows that negress & beaner hambeasts that take up 2 seats with their ass is far more common, and they WILL forcibly sit their ass down in a narrow seat, squeezing everyone else, because their lard mass does not permit them to stand for prolonged periods of time
>>56651106
You're a fucking beta cuck if you allow him to proceed doing this.
No, because we don't have benches in public transport.
I see more often women taking the other seat for their handbag than men doing ''manspreading''.
>>56651200
that is so weird
>>56651057
If you need that much room, present a doctor's note.
>>56651126
some of our rails are setup so each seat has a human sized indent for the butt and a fat person has to take up two of these
Must make some hambeasts angry
>>56650829
/thread
If this is an issue that is openly debated in your country, it basically deserves to be in a civil war.
>>56652232
> one for each cheek
I bet they actually enjoy it, thinking it was done for them in the name of "progress"
