[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why is the United States the only country trying to prevent China
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /int/ - International

Thread replies: 29
Thread images: 1
Why is the United States the only country trying to prevent China from taking over the Pacific?
>>
>>56444155
Are those islands chinese? Otherwise how did they think up these borders, they aren't anywhere near their shore.
>>
>>56444240

If you are to believe the Chinese, the Chinese explored those islands 5000 years ago so they should belong to China today
>>
>>56444155
nips solo recked the chinks until you fucked it up with oil embargoes in ww2
>>
>>56444155
Because Vietnam is our /b/ro
>>
>>56444240
>"they...they are time immemorial!"
>"Look at this ____ Dynasty map I've got, the Islands were there!"
>>
But Argentina sunk a Chinese ship yesterday.
>>
>The U.S are obssesed with some irrelevant islands in the middle of nowere again
Its ww2 all over again.
>>
>>56444155
China is the modern day British Empire

Forefront of industry (altough China has a shitty industry,unlike the former empire),but is nevertheless known for industry
Has a fetish with occupying water
Has a fetish with racial purity (btfo'ing minorities like tibetans or uyghurs,not saying it's a bad thing)
Owns fuckloads of land in Africa,especially the south,just like Britain used to
Owns fuckloads of land and is basically colonising Australia,just like Britain used to
Is pretty fucking huge
Very good with trading
et al
>>
>>56445146
>irrelevant islands

It is about the freedom of navigation.

China is effectively taking over a massive amount of space and will eventually annex it,

If you think that is okay, then that's fine. But you shouldn't complain when Spain decides to annex Portugal.
>>
>>56444240
Communism enables people to perform some impressive mental gymnastics
>>
>>56445146
good lad
>>
paracel islands for china, the west part of spratly islands for vietnam, and the east part and scarborough shoal for the philippines. this would be the most reasonable solution.
>>
>>56445611
Nah it's about oil
>>
>>56444155
BECAUSE NO OTHER COUNTRY IS FCKN SHREDDED ENOUGH TO DO IT
>>
>>56444155
because they benefit more from these countries. losing them means losing their strategic foothold in asia. who controls the pacific islands is a huge benefit to any country in a war. asian islands are the greatest forward bases/ports think of it like stepping stones rather than leaping from a huge land to the other.
also by having the biggest navy in the world by far helps too.
>>
Because jews have appointed yous global policeman

So do your fucking job or the Chinks will take your places,yankee
>>
>>56444155
I don't see any reason to help

I think us Europeans should take a leaf out of the USA's book and not interfere until there's a war and both sides have weakened themselves extensively
>>
>>56444240
This is like saying Wake island is not American because it's far from our shore.
>>
>>56445611
Based upon what law?

The question is who owns the islands, not freedom of navigation.
>>
>>56444155
Because last time East Asians started to take over the Pacific we had a naval base bombed, a major territory invaded as well as some shitty islands taken over. Then we had to slug it out with them almost by ourselves.
>>
>>56444290

It's like you just defined zionism and the state of Israel.

>>56444155

Because it has a vested interest in keeping China navally cucked, along with the rest of Asia-Pacific countries. But for us the whole thing is not of our business.
>>
>>56444155
Because we are the ones who benefit the most from it.

2/10 question
>>
Weren't they like dumping sand into the ocean to make artificial islands and claim those islands were chinese territory?
>>
>>56448583
Yes, it's retarded and IIRC international law basically says you can't make an artificial island and use it to expand territorial waters.
>>
>>56448583
There were existing rock outcrops and atolls that they've built up to be used as airbases/naval bases.

Some were underwater. Others were above water. They are being confusing on purpose.

At the same time the other 6 nationa that dispute the territory have built artificial islands and militarized them BEFORE China did. They (ASEAN) even had armed scuffles over the islands in the past.

It's the scale of China's actions, not the novelty of them.
>>
>>56448752
>At the same time the other 6 nationa that dispute the territory have built artificial islands and militarized them BEFORE China did.
I don't remember them using islands nowhere near them to expand their ocean territory. I believe they just built them as defensive positions.
>>
>>56448817
Well you recall incorrectly. The ASEAN nations built up and militarized their tiny islands/reefs in the past.

Also, China legally owns the Paracel islands. That means the Northern Spratly's are actually within China's EEZ.

Still, the Chinese are pretty much in the wrong here using common sense. It's stupid of them. But so are many of the ASEAN nations. That's what needs to be pointed out. Also, Taiwan claims the exact same areas as China.
>>
France recognized
Chinese sovereignity over the South China Sea in the 60's.
Thread replies: 29
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.