What would it take to bring down the American Empire?
Rome had it's day, but soon fell. Now we truly have an heir to it's throne in the modern day. If you deny that the USA isn't Rome of the 20th/21st century then you're clearly butthurt.
What needs to happen for the "glorious" USA to fall? What can we do as foreign nations to bring it down?
>>56224818
Degeneracy
>>56224881
That's not going to happen as degeneracy will be absorbed into the norm of the country as it continues to function.
>>56224818
>>56224818
Nukes
>>56224966
You realize that not all Americans are obese, right? The U.S. military wouldn't allow themselves to become infested with fat uggos.
>>56224995
You are aware that the U.S. has more than the necessary amount (6) of nuclear missiles to ruin everybody's day on the planet, right?
>>56224818
The same thing that will bring down everyone, wait till more old whites die leaving behind 0-1 kids and watch them be replaced be Mexicans, blacks, and Muslims who have 5-10 kids. Then those kids will kill the white kids.
>>56224818
I think the US is the greatest danger to the US. Internal political dysfunction will damage it more than anything else. Furthermore, the US is becoming less relevant with time as other countries recover from the wars and revolutions of the early 20th century.
>>56225051
Yes, but it's mutually assured suicide. We still fall.
>>56225143
Race is irrelevant here. Get back to >>>/pol/
>>56225148
Is this why Trump will make America great again?
>>56224818
>Rome had it's day, but soon fell.
Rome lasted more than 1000 years.
When the Mexicans take over, which is already going on. Won't last another century
>>56225143
We'll just turn it into a Rhodesia with nice weather. And yes, I'm aware of what happened to Rhodesia. But it will be glorious
>>56225239
Can the U.S. beat their record?
>>56225261
Then how come Hispanic countries are among the fastest growing economies?
>>56225287
sure let me just time travel and tell you, genius
>>56225287
no, shit is developing much faster, but you can make it to 300 years of pax americana IMO, guessing further than that is pure speculation
>>56224818
More taxes, US become great with free trade and low taxes. A bigger government will be the beginning of the end.
An attack on U.S. soil would only unite the nation more. Take 9/11 for example. That day was possibly one of the only days when people of all faiths, ethnicities, sexualities, and genders agreed on something. They're unite and kick your ass.
It's like when Japan invaded China and all of the political parties there joined forces to expel the foreign enemy.
We close all fast food joints
>>56225434
BR?
>>56225508
> Australia
Post discarded.
>>56225434
> Brazil
Post discarded.
>>56225349
Do you think a South American country will become as prosperous and wealthy as the USA and Western Europe in our lifetime?
>>56225617
Brazil is doing well, aren't they?
>>56224818
>What can we do as foreign nations to bring it down?
forgot your proxy brah
>>56225833
No we aren't, we are in recession
>>56225833
No...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2016/01/14/brazils-economy-hasnt-been-this-bad-since-1930/#7a1eebb47dba
>>56225526
Yes, Chile has the best economy in South America and the smaller government
Private enterprise, free trade and economic freedom is the path to greatness
Rome 'soon' fell? They were the most powerful country in the world for centuries. It wasn't soon at all, they had a really good run.
>>56225400
Bring some sci-fi and cyber punk speculasion :-) I say there will be continent-governments, like regional governments whose law and military will be mostly unified under one control, like South American Confederation etc etc But there needs to be some shit to happen like technological advancements, nano-machines and other bullshits :-)
>>56226562
Romes height as overwhelmingly politically dominant really only lasted 2 centuries, and they still had a couple spots in where they had shit tier emperors.
The U.S. has so far been politically dominant since 1945, and while its facing challenges, none of them are anything close to truly threatening its stability as of yet,
>>56224818
And mexicans are modern day barbarians
>>56224818
Hillary winning
>>56227513
>The U.S. has so far been politically dominant since 1945
>Implying Soviet didn't dominate 1945-1970ish
>>56224818
nothing. the American Empire will live on for the rest of humanity's existence
>>56227513
Like fuck were they. The Eastern empire was still a huge force in the 12th Century and still relevant right up until the fall of Constantinople in the 15th.
I make that ~1700 years that Rome was a thing.
Fuck, there were still people Identifying as Roman in Anatolia just after WW1
>>56224932
>That's not going to happen as degeneracy will be absorbed into the norm of the country as it continues to function.
Your country is already crumbling from it
Nations aren't simple geographical boundaries, they are the product of the people who reside in them. When you go from a nation of people who are relatively healthy, fit, alert, charitable and patriotic to a nation of people who are selfish, lazy, lack any kind of moral standards, and isolated from their communities due to huge influxes of foreign cultures and people thus destroying any sense of collective identity, then you get a nation that is far weaker to external threats and far more susceptible to internal decay.
>>56227774
this. the greeks and the turks wanted to refer to themselves as romans just 100 years ago
>>56224818
Destruction of USA serves no purpose.
>>56227663
lmfao, no just stop sven.
>>56227862
This isn't true, none of this is happening and won't happen, I live in America, you don't, enough said
>>56229234
We all living in America.
