who would win in a war (no nukes) ?
>who would win in a war
>it's two major powers 1v1 and no one else at all
>denying reality this hard
stop
the world
>>55857185
UK. All Chinese ships and most Chinese aircraft will be sunk by superior British ships and aircraft/AA before they reach Britain.
I would love nothing more than for the Brits to assravage the Chinks. It saves us the trouble of doing it. Take back Hong Kong, take Macau while they're at it, fuck, take Shanghai. China could do with some British Imperial civilizing.
Sadly, the Chinese have more nukes than the British, so this would end badly for everyone.
>>55857185
>who would win in a war (no nukes) ?
probably UK, as the Commonwealth, US, Germany, France, Poland, etc would overpower China and their very few allies
>>55857185
Brits unless the Chinese can somehow best UK navy and zerg rush
>>55857185
China, and here why:
>They have stock of weapons that they wish they can sell
>They have stock of people that they wish they can kill
>They have no pussies
On the "great leap forward" Chinese people got asked to make steel, just like that, giving them nothing... Chinese people started gathering their utensils and burn them on the streets and make steel, it's just making their utensils worth less, but people did it on schools, governments' institutions, and out of nowhere.
There's no way Britain can stand a war with them, it's just unfair, they aren't even humans. I'm not surprised that no one's fucking with China.
>>55857908
while i agree with you completely but you neglect one thing about war in the modern era, it can't be "fullblown" anymore, UK has a very specialised command structure and mission capable assets while the chinese are comically disorganised , they can't do anything in a war that lasts hours-days but they will be a problem in a war that'll last a month, the UK would strike surgically not massively.
>>55858179
We know nothing about how a war today will look like.
It will start by attacking satellites, so GPS will not work anymore, so rockets can't hit their targets.
Airstrikes are worthless today since they are a freebie for anti-aircrafts.
So again we are forced to fight on a classic war if both sides had those two things.
Also China is more ready for war since only decades ago were on kind of cold war with Russia.
>>55857564
Chinese anti-naval defence is massive though
it would basically be a stalemate at sea
>>55857778
>it has more military weapons stock pile & personnel
Then how the fuck does ISIS exist?
>>55858338
>It will start by attacking satellites, so GPS will not work anymore, so rockets can't hit their targets.
Why wouldn't they just use glonass then tbqh?
>>55859212
because all ARMRAM's are GPS guilded
what are you saying go back to using sparrow missiles ?
Do those even fit in a F35, or just a euro fighter?
lel.
Brits are cucked by american nigger. China is independent nation
This totally depends on what kind of war.
>>55858338
>It will start by attacking satellites, so GPS will not work anymore, so rockets can't hit their targets.
We won't be reliant on GPS when Galileo gets fully up and running
>So again we are forced to fight on a classic war if both sides had those two things.
What is a "classic war" and why would Britain choose to fight like that?
>Also China is more ready for war since only decades ago were on kind of cold war with Russia.
Britain has more war experience than China, and we were also in that Cold War you mention.
>>55857185
>65 million whose government puts PR over the safety of its own people vs more than 1 billion who literally eat dogs and babies
hmmmmmmmmmm
>>55860657
there would not be enough dogs and babies
>>55860691
then they'll use the female population as a food source
simple
>>55859193
>ISIS
you funded them
>>55860616
>We won't be reliant on GPS when Galileo gets fully up and running
I think he meant all of those satellite positioning systems.
>>55857185
>if they had a common land border
China
>sea war
stalemate
>>55857185
China, of course if USA is not involved, if it is, US will win.
>>55857185
China have ulimited man power.
No one can win with them 1vs1 with no nukes.
>>55863058
>stalemate
More like strategic Britain victory.
>>55857185
Brits?
Plz dont insult China
>>55869134
Do you love your cunt?
>>55869499
Of course.
>>55869579
Wow it's just like fucking chink to love such a fucking cunt.
Fuck you fucking panda fucker.
>>55869788
>Breathing the air which is polluted by the radiation
>Enjoying the seafood from Fukushima
>As a fucking doglike labor working but can not save ur money due to ur ridiculous negative interest rate
>Having a daughter who will be ether raped by the hentai or become an AV actress
Dicksucker nip I forgive u coz i know ur life is not easy
>China actually winning against a foreign power
They can only destroy themselves properly.
>>55869788
>>55863058
>>55864937
Chineese navy is stronger than American one.
British is like a toddler now.
>>55870560
t. armchair military expert
>>55870622
You realise that Britain would be obliterated in a conflict like that?
I don't know if America can take on China right now, but fucking Britain?
It's not opium wars or boxer rebellion anymore.
>>55857185
This>>55863058
Although if you gave the Chinese a year to pump out ships and airplanes they would eventually overwhelm the Brits inital strategic advantage.
Despite the meme about China rapidly arming up, they still only spend 1.6% of GDP on their military. That's the NATO average if you exclude America.
>>55870472
Chinks won like 4 different wars and pushed us into a stalemate since 1950.
Strategic British victory
We could never invade without France or burger land
China has a lot of sun burn ASM but the UK would manage to get around that with well workers logistics
China would be blockaded
People would revolt due to poverty/decent against the war
All around none would gain
Maybe we will get HK back and some islands
Just think, even if each Brit managed to kill 3 Chinamen, by the last Brit killed the Chinese would still have 760 million remaining.
>>55870709
Sorry why would we be obliterated exactly? Our fleet is weak just because it's small?
UK
Yellow people are inferior to white people.
