i am growing stronger
*drops dead*
>>54883885
Not really. He's fucked in Nevada, SC, and on Super Tuesday.
What's reassuring is that based on the public comments he's made about the Presidential race in general, he's a hell of a lot smarter than his supporters.
>>54884277
idk about that
candidate success is pretty heavily based on media attention and Bernie is turning into the Democrat side's darling boy while hillary is just the old spiteful hag
>>54884353
Hillary has always had obscene pull with the press.
>>54884353
You're ignoring several far, far more important factors. Not sure why.
>>54883988
kek
Wouldn't be surprised if it happened still during his campaign.
>>54884353
Candidate success in this case is based way more on demographics and political leanings. Sanders is at a huge disadvantage in both cases.
People seem to not understand the simple fact that there isn't a real democracy and that Hillary Clinton will win because the important people of the united states (CEOs, Bankers, etc.), are sponsoring her campaign and will make sure she win.
But hey! Lets live in a lie, it feels much better
>>54884730
Uh... and there's the fact that more Democratic party voters favor her over Sanders for the nomination.
>>54884730
I think the main reason is that he is too much far-left. Americans would never elect someone who calls himself a socialist. Maybe only to prevent Trump from being in office.
>>54884897
If it was Sanders vs Trump, Sanders would lose because Bloomberg would run as an independent and split the Dem vote.
>>54884795
if this bankers and CEOs made propaganda and lobby for sanders, then sanders would win because people would think hillary is X and Sanders is Y and therefore they should vote Sanders
>>54885009
You're naive as fuck. I'm embarrassed for you.
>>54885009
That is not exactly how it works, mate.
What do you mean by "bankers make propaganda"? Are you saying that a business analyst from Citibank creates adverts for people to vote for Hillary?
What happens is companies donating money to campaigns. Directly manipulating voters is another matter completely.
>>54884897
I don't think the """"""""far-left"""""""" (by American standards) frightens people as much these days.
For 8 years, the right has been claiming Obama is a socialist that would put Stalin to shame, yet the gulags have failed to materialize.
>>54886644
Yeah, it doesn't frighten you people anymore as much as it should. If, for a miracle, Sanders managed to pass his reforms, they would be a fucking disaster for your economy and way of life.
>>54884730
Are you a YouTube or Russia Today comment?
>>54884353
sanders still doesn't get much press coverage here. if what you're saying were true trump or hilary would win.
>>54884353
Super delegates are all for Hillary, Bernie can't win.
Bernie literally can't win. He's doing well in majority-white states, but minorities will NEVER vote for him. Any state that is more than 10+% nonwhite will go to Hillary.
>>54890241
why won't minorities vote for him? wasn't he a civil rights protester back in the 60's or some shit?
>>54890314
They don't care about that shit. If you're a white male then you're evil.
>>54890401
oh, so you're just retarded then. ok.
>>54890450
That's not me, dude. The BLM movement has been nothing but bad. It's pumped minorities full of contempt.
>>54890314
>>54890314
>>54890314
>>54884277
has there ever been a presidential candidate who has actually been dumber than his supporters?
>>54883885
YES WE CAN XD
https://vimeo.com/154865290
>>54890728
George W Bush
>>54890776
fair point, if by supporters you mean his rich backers. but surely he wasn't dumber than an average republican?
it's going to be clinton vs Cruz.
msm won't allow trump or bernie near the presidential election.
>>54890776
I still have a bible of his funny quotes, found them when looking through my stuff the other week. Still worth several quality chuckles. Guy must've been a firebrand at parties.
>>54890450
wow you're naive
>>54890837
No. I think he was. If he wasn't dumber than he was on par.
Of course we all know that he was just the face of his administration. He had a very loose grasp on concepts outside of fishing and golf and even then I'm not sure how good he is at either of those.
>>54890897
>"There's an old saying in Tennessee. I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee that says, 'Fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. Fool me... You can't get fooled again!'"
This one always gets me.
>>54890179
>>54890241
/thread
He needs a ridiculous percentage over Hillary (~15-20% higher) in almost every other primary to win, and given Iowa I don't think that's gonna happen
>>54891031
Hahaha that's amazing. And it's all unintentional too.
I like this one: "Border relations between Canada and Mexico have never been better"
>>54891031
>Trying to make a speech after listening to The Who
Yet another reason to hate classic rock
>>54890951
stop calling people naive if you can't ever provide evidence to the contrary.
I am for bernie now but if he losses to hillary(which he probably will) then i am all for trump
>>54891326
The PC liberal butthurt caused by Trump is almost too good to pass up but I will vote for Kasich if the primary ever gets to my state.
P.S fuck Iowa and New Hampshire, they should do all the primaries in one day
remove gommies
>>54890179
what the fuck are super delegates
>>54891590
Oh yeah i now remembered that Kasich has Croatian origins,he did pretty good in New Hampshire,if only half croatian would be president of US of A.
Feelsgoodman
>>54891938
The Democratic Party keeps a large number of delegates that don't have to vote for who the American people voted for. They can vote for who they want. Most of them have pledged allegiance to Hillary.
>>54892122
how great...
>>54891975
Croats are the best sports coaches
>Nick Saban
>Bill Belichick
>Poppovich
>>54892122
True spirit of democracy right there
>>54892236
These are not governmental organizations
>>54892122
>The """""Democratic""""" Party
>>54883885
Not strong enough.
Hillary has:
1) All of the women over 30
2) Every subhuman shitskin
3) Every superdelegate
4) Infinite money from her banker friends
She can't lose.
>>54892328
she couldn't lose to obama either. but she did. twice.
>>54892328
>all the women over 30
>>54892370
Because Obama got the subhuman shitskin vote. This time around, Hillary's getting it. White democrats are beholden to their brown owners. Bernie is going to lose every state that has a notable nonwhite population. Iowa and New Hampshire are almost entirely white and are not good indicators of what is to come.
>>54892294
republicans use the same system
I just want Bernie to win so Trump doesn't fuck us up. Bernie won't be able to get anything passed in either the House or the Senate, so we'll have 4 years of peace.
>>54892517
What. Trump also wouldn't be able to do jackshit. The Congress would cuck "the god emperor" so hard that /pol/ would remain as everybody's laughting stock for another 4 years.
>>54892483
Superdelegates are more of an issue with Democrats because the DNC abuses it so much. Republicans use less superdelegates so no one really bothers to worry about it because it's an inconsequential amount whereas a large amount of Democrat voter are superdelegates . Like 20% of DNC delegates are superdelegates whereas only a tiny percentage of Republican delegates are superdelegates.
>>54892686
both will be throwing out executive orders like crazy.
>>54890648
>>54890693
>shitskins
Half of those posts look like they came from white people.
>>54892844
Not really. There's only one or two profile pictures of white people in those images. Regardless, self-hating white leftists are mentally niggers so you might as well consider them shitskins.
>>54883885
http://hydra-media.cursecdn.com/dota2.gamepedia.com/3/36/Nstalk_level_05.mp3
>>54890728
reagan and bush
>>54890179
>>54892122
Superdelegates go with the will of the voters. They're a formality like the electoral college at this point. It would be party suicide to give the middle finger to the voters like that.
Why do shitskins even go for hillary anyways
>>54896688
Well they're both irrational psychopaths
>>54896012
There's no evidence that Sanders will win the popular vote. Did you know that Clinton got more popular votes in 2008 than Obama?
>>54896688
She was the first lady of the first black president of the US
