>ywn assassinate the australian PM
Get glassed leb
>>53559544
>Assassinating Turnbull
Literally why?
Is it because he wants to go softer on immigrants than Tone Bone?
>>53559544
Reported to the AFP
this pm is lame. never hear anything about him in the news.
>>53559544
tell me more of your plan
>>53559638
This
Daily reminder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FxcHVLmPgs
>>53559638
The only time you might maybe here about him is after the next federal election. Beyond that, there's no reason to hear about him because there's nothing really noteworthy about him. Normal, bland politician. Reasonably well spoken, bachelor of law, pretends to be in touch with the common man but isn't really, the usual shit desu.
25/01/16
>>53559544
Most of you lot don't even know whose turn it is at being PM for the week
>>53559948
We do swap about more than we should, don't we?
>Musical seats
ÀNTHONY ALBANESE TANYA PLIBERSEK LEADERSHIP WHEN
>>53559544
>Tones is still gone
>>53559948
should be coming up on the corpse of steve irwin's turn I reckon
>you will never depose the current prime minister as a result of petty intra-party squabbling and politicking
>>53560047
Literal dream team.
>>53560145
>>53560047
What about penny wong for pm?
>>53560219
She's actually ok, I wouldn't want her for PM though and not because she's a literal
>asian dyke
kek good luck with that penny
>>53560219
>tfw my Abbott gif is now outdated
Are there any gifs of Turnbull making a fool of himself while trying to appear like a real human?
>>53560109
>grown """man"""
>can't even hammer a nail into a hole when it's already been seated for him
And to think these people throw these stupid publicity stunts to try to appeal to regular people.
>>53560219
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwAnNl_TE50
>>53559746
>Reasonably well spoken
Implying you could articulate any better
So how long until the next election so I can watch based Labour BTFO the liberals?
>tfw miss based Gillard
>>53560625
Labor*
And I dunno how likely that is. Labor under Shorten are pissweak but it remains to be seen if the Coalition will shoot themselves in the foot.
>>53560615
No, I didn't; you inferred it. It's not the same thing.
>>53560724
>if the Coalition will shoot themselves in the foot.
If voters could remember further back than six weeks, the Coaltion already would have shot themselves in the foot.
