Is low birth rate really all that bad?
>>53474735
>niger
>>53474735
In 50 years when the robots do all the work definitely not. Nowadays it will lead to labor shortages and it will be hard to financially support all the old people.
>>53474735
Well we are gonna live on a planet with 5 billion Blacks, 5 billion Muslims, 5 billion Indians and 1 billion others. Does that sound good?
>>53475284
This Czech speaks the truth. In 50 years it won't matter at all.
>Nowadays it will lead to labor shortages and it will be hard to financially support all the old people.
With the latter I won't argue, but labor shortages? Seriously? Have you looked at the unemployment rates among the youth in Europe? It's ridiculously high. If anything we need more jobs and even less people.
>>53474735
No, every single country in Africa and the Middle-East needs low birth rates imo.
There is already too much scum on this planet as is and they are dragging humanity down.
>India
>over a billion people
>still has an above replacement birth rate
god help us
What's the point of building a country, if all you have is a job?
Kids and families make people invested in the future.
And loud whiny cunts are mostly eternal singles that have a kid at 40. It's very important to stop people from turning into those campaign tools.
>>53474735
>Singapore
Holy shit.
It's good, the raising cost in labor due to scarce people will force the companys to develope robots to do it.
>>53476311
But mena has low fertility you edgy faggot
>>53474735
Is dying out bad?
>>53474735
Below replacement right now is bad, in 50 or 100 years maybe not.
>>53476941
You mean 2+ outside Tunisia?
Euros consider 1 as low.
>>53476720
They are a meme country and it's not a meaningful statistic
It's like measuring the births in a shopping mall
>>53476311
You're so edgy
>>53477105
2-3 is low as its not that far from europe and very far from sub sahra
>>53477032
>over 7 billion people
>dying out due to low birth rate and not overpopulation, environmental destruction, and exhaustion of natural resources
American education, ladies and gentlemen. Someone post that photo of Jesus petting a raptor.
>>53474735
Anything too different from 2/woman is shit
Why is 2.1 considered the stable threshold, not 2.0?
>>53477461
Younger people dying/not having kids
2 babies might not turn into 2 adults that reproduce
>>53477629
But those dying people will mean a statistic of 0 children over a lifteime and should drag it down, no?
>>53477461
Margin for deaths.
>>53474735
No, when your country has a 27% unemployment rate having kids is retarded.
>>53474735
all these birthrate statistics are fake and gay.
more then 6 fucking kids is being professionally pregnant .and i dont think someone in those countries can afford that .
they probably have like a 80% infant mortality or something .
>>53477672
No, dead people aren't considered when computing TFR.
>>53477672
Your confusing replacement rates and birth rates
>>53477767
>>53477766
Oh I get it
Thanks red/white flags
>>53477757
I've read that Israel is the only rich country in the world that has an above-replacement birth rate.
How is that? Is it all those Palestinians/Arabs and Hasids doing all the baby-making?
>>53477757
>more then 6 fucking kids is being professionally pregnant
Poor people have lots of children
>i dont think someone in those countries can afford that
They can't but it doesn't stop them.
>>53477842
Hasidic????? Jews, the ones that are very religious make lots of babies
France has above two but I'm pretty wary of mentioning them.
>>53476720
It's just a city.
>>53477842
Iceland and New Zealand have both an above-replacement birth rate and are more developed than Israel.
>>53475616
Guess which one is going to rule all the others?
>>53477757
They have lots of children because they're poor. Rubbish healthcare and education means they have sex all the time and half the kids die after a few years anyway.
Finnish statistics >>53478600
