ITT: remove parts of your country that would make it perfect.
>>53319508
what's wrong with the midlands?
>>53316870
you took most of the richest states out and left alabama and mississippi
>>53319611
Just because it's rich doesn't make it good.
What have I done
>>53319735
I was going to upload pretty much the same thing.
>What have I done
You've removed kebabs, SJW and inbred alcoholics rednecks.
>>53319672
explain why you took them out then. I'm going to guess "too many liberals" but you left the PNW and NE intact so I can't really tell.
>>53319735
What's wrong with the south and Brittany man?
southern ontario and hongkouver
>>53316870
>New York
>California
>Texas
>Florida
You literally killed 80% of Americas Tourism.
Just nuke the red places.
>>53319826
>south
Full of arabs
>Brittany
Full of inbred rednecks who hate France and burn public properties while getting the biggest amount of welfare, piggeries pollute so much that they can't even drink tap water and it creates huge waves of toxic algae on Normandy's beaches, etc.
>>53320115
Good God, THIS!
>>53319611
the corridor from london to manchester is full of coons and various other trash
>>53319882
Here's the only right answer
Also, I din't completely remove Quebec, but I did thin it out a bit for obvious reasons.
>>53319958
>Texas
>Tourism
>>53320771
texas is one of the most visited states in terms of tourism you corkscrew. get your facts straight.
>>53320462
i have no quarrels with this.
you've literally just kept all of the white places in canada intact so that.s good imo. although our economy would be shite.
>>53320462
Nah, remove most of Ontario and Quebec, Manitoba because from what I've seen everyone from at least Winnipeg is fucking autistic. Remove just the people from Labrador because they all sniff gas. Alberta is Canada's Texas, so fuck that. The territories can stay I guess because they don't do much, neither good nor bad. I know nothing about Saskatchewan so whatever.
Oh wait
>>53320771
>he never hopped the border
lots of tourists :^)
Done
