Why did the central Asian countries get cucked by the Soviet Union with no resistance at all?
because kazaks are literally the most beta people in the world
>>52823022
They were weak and undeveloped. just steppe guys doing steppe things. Even more powerful cunts were rekt by leather coats, man.
>>52823077
>t. made a stupid deal with the soviets btw
>>52823136
Why did you let kazakhs get away with so much land is the better question.
>>52823077
this
>>52823241
They barely made it with lands they have today.
>>52823220
define stupid deal
Daily reminder that the total population of Uzbeks is 30 Million, while Kazakhs have 15 Million and Turkmens only 8 Million.
>>52823241
Because it was Turkestan centuries before commies appeared?
>>52823229
What?
>>52823521
Mujahideen killed the Soviet Union
>>52823559
You mix some unrelated proxy war with Kazakhs. I don't get it.
Because they were backward Islamic shitholes and as shitty as the Soviets were, they did manage to improve the daily lives of most people there. Also they were conquered by the Russian empire first, not the USSR.
>>52823022
>no resistance
Kek. Read more about Russian Civil War in this areas
>>52823559
that was afghanistan ffs
>>52824460
also, cite from wiki:
>Armed national resistance in Central Asia was not completely crushed until 1934.
>>52823813
>>52824543
My point being a poor country like Afghanistan killed the stepped on the Soviet Unions throat
In view of population of the locals,
Central Asia was almost nothing compared to European Russia.
Soviet just groomed the countryside of Iran.
>>52824778
You're dumb m8. Afghanistan adventure didn't kill soviet union. Nationalisms, disillusionment with socialism, wanting freedoms of press and multiparty political systems etc. did it.
In any case, you are being off topic.
>>52825179
Going broke and one of the worst morale wars in modern history killed the Soviet Union
>>52824778
Name one country that was able to successfully invade Afghanistan.
>>52825382
Achaemenid Empire
