You claim to be fluent in English. Well?
1. belong
2. affecting, not effecting
3. fewer
4. has gone is wrong, went
>>52795825
god's work, here have a prize
>>52795905
How exotic. Is that the food of your people?
i didn't get the second one. although i just woke up. gg
>>52795825
Wait, actually, attempt to effect is wrong. Effecting in the case is not a berb.
>>52795825
This, except number 4 is split infinitive ("to go boldly" instead of "to boldly go")
1. "Pile of books" is a singular object and thus "they" should be "it"
2. effect is wrong
3. many people think less should be fewer, but it actually doesn't matter which you use. less can be used in place of fewer and it is still grammatically correct.
4. nothing wrong here except maybe go boldly instead of boldly go
>>52795473
1. Belong
2. No idea, should the final word be affect?
3. Fewer, thanks Stannis
4. Swap boldly and go around
I dont claim i'm fluent. I claim i can comunicate with losers from all over the world through shitposting
>>52796095
English isn't a Romance language. It doesn't have infinitives.
>>52796335
ay fuck these faggelinos m8, its all about being fluent in shitposting
>>52795473
1. where it belonged
2. affection's affecting of
3. has fewer problems
4. to go boldly
>>52795473
I wish I were fluent. I can't even speak Spanish properly desu. I'm terrible at expressing myself. Guess I really have assburgers.
>>52796335
I didn't expect more from you, scum
>>52796365
It has them.
>Regarding English, the term "infinitive" is traditionally applied to the unmarked form of the verb (the "plain form") when it forms a non-finite verb, whether or not introduced by the particle to. Hence sit and to sit, like used in the following sentences, would each be considered an infinitive:
>I can sit here all day.
>I want to sit on the other chair.
