Does the romanian language sound neo-latin to you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz0K-0c0nT8
>>52767087
Would you group that with ''Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and French''?
>>52767087
hello hairy arab.You already got REKTED multiple times on last thread
>>52730653
Stop with this threads
>>52770057
Thanks for linking to that thread in which I mopped the floor with you.
Dry those tears now.
>>52767087
Rumania is Romance. They're rightful heirs to Eastern Romans.
They have Slavic and Magyar influence so what? Don't others have Germanic? Especially French who are not even proper Romance but Germanic people.
>>52770622
>rightful heirs to Eastern Romans
Pic related, they were barely part of it.
>They have Slavic and Magyar influence so what
Much more.
>French who are not even proper Romance but Germanic people
>people
I'm talking about linguistics and culture, stop obsessing over genetics like all romanians with inferiority complexes.
>>52770622
French is a proper neo-latin language which also used to sound much more neo-latin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKuUqsR4WOY
and still does in the South.
It also comes directly from Old French which comes directly from Vulgar Latin which is what the romans spoke. Look at those two texts, this is in Vulgar Latin:
"Pro Deu amore et pro christianu poplu et nostru commune salvamentu, d'ista die in avante, in quantu Deus sapere et potere mi donat, sic salvaraeo ecc'istu meom fratre Carolu, et in adiuta et in cat'una cosa, sic como omo per diretu suom fratre salvare devet, in oc quod ille mi altersic faciat. Et apu Lotharu nullu placitu nunquam prenderaeo quid meom volu ecc'istu meom fratre Carolu in damno sit."
and this is the Old French equivalent:
''Pro Deo amur et pro christian poblo et nostro commun saluament, d'ist di in auant, in quant Deus sauir et podir me dunat, si saluarai eo cist meon fradre Karlo, et in adiudha et in cadhuna cosa si cum om per dreit son fradra saluar dist, in o quid il mi altresi fazet. Et ab Ludher nul plaid nunquam prindrai qui meon uol cist meon fradre Karle in damno sit.''
>>52770551
I thought I was the only one using Sgarbi
>>52771484
Looks like there's two of us.
>>52770057
t. """daco-getic""" speaker of the firsts Romance language
I know this is b8, but it's still hilarious
didn't trajan grab you for like 5 minutes, how are you roman
>>52771681
Interestingly, pic related is Romania's national hero:
>Hunted, having his army defeated and finally cornered by Roman detachments seeking his head. Rather than being captured to be exhibited and humiliated at Rome, Decebalus committed suicide by slashing his own throat, as depicted on Trajan's Column (spiral 22, panel b).
>It is likely that he killed himself as a Roman cavalry scout named Tiberius Claudius Maximus from Legio VII Claudia was approaching.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decebalus#Death
>>52771593
hillarious why?
No, romanians have nothing to do with the romans, they're gypsies.
>>52771982
the one Romanian I know is blonde hair with blue eyes and absolutely hates gypsies
>>52772028
t. Ceausescu
>>52771982
1.You have almsot as many gipsies as us
2.The only reason it shos this on google is because 95% of gipsies that emmigrate from Romania emmigrate to do crimes,so you get on google the portraits from police of gypos who are called romanian because they have romanian passport.
3.Italy is greco-arab mix in South,North is a mix of every nation from Europe.
4.Everyone can see how romanians look by going on youtube and searching : romanian faces
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=romanian+faces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDY8voTduMw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlCTQdMMMXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVQV0mzLXRk
>>52772180
Your faces won't make your vocal cords produce actual neo-latin sounds.
Romanian literally doesn't sound neo-latin AT ALL.
Compare this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pMlXyzpwxA
To:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttAy5UrNqgA
Which one sounds unmistakbly neo-latin? Italian of course!
>>52767087
still it sounds more romance than portuguese
>>52772836
No, this meme needs to stop. Maybe when they scream or speak extremely fast but then again, some italian dialects don't sound very neo-latin too. When spoken calmly and well it sounds unmistakably neo-latin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa546EesVPE
Romanian might not sound as neo-latin as italian but it is still considered latin because of it's grammar and about the fact that 75% of it's words are from latin. That's the only truth not shut the fuck up already
>>52773053
how does this sound to you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP2k-0X6zqE
>>52773125
Sorry but grammar is not the only important factor. Phonetics and words are and as for the latter:
>During the Middle Ages, Romanian became influenced by the Slavic languages and to some degree by Greek.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_language#Prehistory
>Romanian has had a greater share of foreign influence than some other Romance languages such as Italian in terms of vocabulary and other aspects.
>In modern times Romanian vocabulary has been strongly influenced by French, Italian and other languages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_language#Classification
>The Slavic influences on Romanian are especially noticeable and can be observed at all linguistic levels: lexis, phonetics, morphology and syntax. About 20% of modern Romanian words are of Slavic origin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_language#Slavic_languages
Pic related, they've literally been cucked linguistically and culturally.
Romanian might not sound as neo-latin as italian but it is still considered latin because of it's grammar and about the fact that 75% of it's words are from latin. That's the only truth now shut the fuck up already.
Italian sounds a lot more neo-latin than romanian but romanian is still a romance language.
What do you want to prove or to achieve? That's the truth and no one is argueing with you...
>>52773170
>posting a song in which words related to flowers and seasons are repeated
Nice try but even in english the words related to flowers and seasons are neo-latin.
As for the phonetics, nope. Still doesn't sound neo-latin. Here's a normal folk song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7Ol0t3_Clo
Sounds turkish as fuck.
>>52773170
Literally three words repeated countless times: ''primavara'', ''ochii'' and ''fluierul''.
>>52773210
>Sorry but grammar is not the only important factor
I completly agree with you here.It's still a major factor though.
>During the Middle Ages, Romanian became influenced by the Slavic languages and to some degree by Greek.
Ok, no one is trying to deny that.
>The Slavic influences on Romanian are especially noticeable and can be observed at all linguistic levels: lexis, phonetics, morphology and syntax. About 20% of modern Romanian words are of Slavic origin.
That's what I said, again, no one is trying to argue here, it's just you that is trying to prove a non-existent point of view.
>Pic related, they've literally been cucked linguistically and culturally.
What do you except ? No one here is saying that they remained pure latin, they've been hardly influenced thourhout the decades because all of their neighbours are slavs.
Can you answer my question and tell me why ? Why all these links and preparation for this bullshit threads ? Why so much hate for romanians and romanian language? Why do you feel the need to be superior in front of romanians ?
>>52773218
I answered this already, soothe your jimmies: >>52773210
I also don't believe that you're polish. Only a romanian would come to every single one of these threads to whine.
>>52773436
This is just in reply to romanians' usual ''we iz da true latins and sheit'', ''our language be da real latin and sheit all others be just bastards yall!'' bullshit.
>>52773461
I only come here because I hate you personally.You can believe what you want.When I see your threads I always imagine a stupid 3 year old whining and throwing shit around him.
>I answered this already
No, you didn't the only thing you said was changing the subject.Never really answering any question.
>>52773545
Who said that romanians are real latins.I think it may be hard for an Italian to read but at least try to read my replies before you throw your shit at me.
You probably won't reply and continue with spreading hate and trying to look "superior" with your language.At least talk the current situation of your country and try to look superior with that.I hope you will understand that no one is trying to argue with you here and you just look silly and stupid with these threads.
I don't think you'll reply anymore because you know that I'm right.
>>52773762
>I only come here because I hate you personally.
>>52773851
As I can see I'm totally right again. Italians are not smart enough to use real arguments.Only whining and repeating what I said, exactly like a parrot.
I don't understand you.You are only spreading hate looking your own country look bad.
>>52774062
>he's genuinely upset
>>52772314
Italian is obviously much closer to Latin
but Romanian has a closer pronunciation to ancient Latin.
>>52775322
This is where you're wrong though. The romans during the Republic and Empire period spoke Vulgar Latin which literally looks like an italian dialect. The pronounciation of romanian is not in any way closer to what was spoken on the italian peninsula 2000 years ago. It's very much slavic influenced.
there's no need to pay too much attention to romanians these days, they've become the australians of the balkans
>>52767087
Are you that hungarian who lives in Canada?
There is no such thing as "neo-latin" There is latin vulgaris and all the Romance languages that use it as a base. You wouldn't know it because hungarian is a foreign language to Europe. Hence the bozgor name of your "people". It's like asking an italian if Cantonese and Mandarin sound different.
>>52779275
>It's like asking an italian if Cantonese and Mandarin sound different
Since I am not hungarian but italian, you can ask me that question and I would reply to you by letting you know that I am very much aware that these two languages sound different. Cantonese sounds more like ''ching chang dong ding gang ga'' while Mandarin sounds more like ''shu shi chi sha shu chi cha shu''.
As for romanian, it still doesn't sound neo-latin. Sorry.
