1. Ur countree
2. Post your political compass in this thead ITT
https://www.politicalcompass.org/test
I'm in the purple.
why?
>>52742166
mine is the same as you, no need to post
>>52742322
this
>>52742313
borderline crazy racist grampa.
>>52742313
There's goimg to be General Election next year and I don't have anyone for whom I can vote
>>52742322
>>52742340
R u me???
>left wing "libertarian"
nice meme
>>52742353
ok
Anyone who is not in blue needs to go back to reddit
America
>all these literal cuckolds in the green
>>52742780
Oh you know now that I think about it I don't need to post my country because we all have flags and I somehow forgot about it
>>52742729
I know right? How can people want freedom both in the economic AND social aspects? Makes no sense to my simple mind, so I might as well just call it a meme.
>>52742857
>leterally hitler xddd
pls
>>52742857
>Implying anime fags aren't complete degenerates
>implying centrism doesn't exist
Also, social justice warriors have a tendency of being on the red square, not the green one. They like a LOT of government intervention.
>>52742950
what the fug
>>52742780
This is me
Tricky tбh. They mix social norms with economy and politics.
>>52742313
I was placed about here too
>>52742950
>>52742992
centrism, but with a scary tendency of believing a big powerful and strict government can solve all problems.
>>52742837
complete freedom in both economic and social aspects is libertarian right
libertarian left advocates for measures which benefit certain social groups over others such as affirmative action and racial/gender quotas
Interesting
>>52743064
the questions are VERY poorly worded with some outright sensationalist to try to influence your answer. If the questionnaire was used for an actual study the study would be thrown out do to bias.
>>52743215
I would be smack in the middle if it wasn't for the last questions
>>52743152
Makes sense. Green square near top favors free education and healthcare. Near the bottom it approaches a society with no government, but where people still share things, it's the sort of utopia that believes humans are inherently good and will do only good things.
>>52742837
> liberals
> support forcing employers to hire someone they don't want to just because he is black or gay
> support forcing companies to serve certain customers and provide certain services because muh discrimination
> support publicly funded abortions to fix people's personal mistakes
> support pushing the government into marriage even more
> support "it's free speech until it's hurts my feelings speech" laws
> somehow this is social freedom
>>52743357
I phrased the first one badly. I didn't mean that they won't hire him because he is black or gay, I meant that they are forced to hire someone just because he is black or gay, no matter what a shitty candidate for the job he is.
>>52743215
also sorry for the typos. im on mobile
heres some examples:
If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
It's a sad reflection on our society that something as basic as drinking water is now a bottled, branded consumer product.
It is regrettable that many personal fortunes are made by people who simply manipulate money and contribute nothing to their society.
The questions are outright worded in a way that makes an argument for one side. There is absolutely no reason that they should not be worded more fairly and straight foraward such as "The rich are too highly taxed"
not even trying to be a tinfoil /pol/tard when I say this but there is certainly a leftist bias to this test
>>52743401
But this is just stupid, do they do this in america?
No company should be forced to hire anyone they don't want. Now, Government giving incentives for companies to hire people who would normally have no chance, like people who have been to prison, is a different story.
>>52743357
I consider myself a liberal but I don't support anything but
>support publicly funded abortions to fix people's personal mistakes
are abortions publicly funded?
Whelp, I'm more liberal than Ghandi
Appearantly i'm an anarchist. Whatever that means.
>>52743457
>>52743559
Sup Ron Paul.
>>52743490
Not necessarily, but many liberals do support this.
>>52743486
It's called affirmative action, and at least in America, it's not some obscure idea.
>>52743357
Affirmative action based on race is pretty retarded imo
>>52743490
yes, planned parenthood is publically funded and performs abortion.
>>52742166
>>52742223
>>52742780
>>52742787
>>52743153
>>52743231
>>52743457
>>52743539
>>52743647
fuggen gommies :DDDDDDD
>>52743646
Oh, and freech speech should never be restricted unless you're threating someone with violence
>>52743486
the government does not force people to hire anyone per se but in some cases they tax companies more if they are not diverse enough. It leads to companies hiring people based on the color of their skin instead of their qualifications
kind of unrelated but humorous side note: Sweden also does this but has recently ended affirmative action in their universities as well as their nursing sectors because it was beginning to favor men. they have left the policies in place everywhere else however.
>>52743669
I literally answewed "YES" to every economic freedom.
>>52743559
good lad
>>52743771
yet the fall on the left of the spectrum
>>52743771
see
>>52743439
I would take the results of the test with a large grain of salt
>>52743669
> yes, planned parenthood is publically funded and performs abortion.
The counter argument is that government money for planned parenthood does not go towards abortions, but, that's a retarded argument since they are still funding an organization which does abortions which is really the same thing as funding abortions, it doesn't matter if they didn't use that specific dollar bill to fund the abortion.
>>52742837
>libertarian left has freedom in social aspects
>hate speech laws
>affirmative action
>****freedom****
>>52743727
free speech should absolutely NEVER be restricted. If people are using their free speech right to threat someone, hate speech or anything, they should suffer the consequences, but not have their speech restricted.
>>52742313
>>52742775
>>52742819
>>52743123
>>52743844
All these edgy faggots
>>52743747
source? in norway girls have an easier time getting into STEM education and guys have an easier time getting into nursery and similar
>>52743943
>>52743978
http://arhiva.dalje.com/en-world/sweden-to-abolish-affirmative-action/289636
http://www.thelocal.se/20100112/24330
>>52743647
>>52743669
It was an old chart, but meh, it still is very similar. I'm a hippie pinko.
>>52743923
I don't think you should be able to go around and tell someone you're going to kill him/her or yell "Fire!" when there's nothing burning
>>52743865
I agree, they're far from being newtral.
>>52744070
You see, you don't want to censor their speech, you just want to make those specific things you listed (death threats, fake warnings) crimes.
>>52744029
Thanks. Jesus, reading any newspaper in Swedish makes me more redpilled than /pol/ could ever do.
>>52744070
you cant do this, at least not in the US and I support the way it is now
I do not however believe hate speech laws should EVER be a thing unless you are openly trying to bring physical harm or death onto another person.
For example. you can actually be arrested in Britain for dressing in blackface on Halloween or for calling someone a Nigger. Even as an Indian I find this unbelievably retarded
>>52743357
>> support publicly funded abortions to fix people's personal mistakes
Mate having a mother on welfare because she had drop out of highschool because of her unwanted kid costs the state a lot more money
These political compasses always get stunted if you don't really care about the gays, sex, abortion or religion/religious education. Why should these things be so important in determining where you are on the political spectrum?
Politics and political alignment is just a massive dick wanking competition. Subjective opinions on how the world "should" run.
>>52744391
Because they are current, important political issues.
>>52744177
Lol, scroll down on the page, this is the wrong graph.
>>52744480
>current
ok
>important
top kek
>>52744348
If it's beneficial or not to publicly fund abortions in extreme cases is another matter. We are talking about social freedom right now, and forcing the public to fund abortions is definitely not social freedom. To respond to your claim though, I'm still not sure if the public should fund them. Rather, they should probably work on ways to stop teenage pregnancies in the first place.
>>52744348
I just support killing said single mothers and their harem of little nigglet mistakes.
Nothin' out of the ordinary.
>>52744682
Having free abortions for all simply costs a lot less for the government than dealing with those children later on.
It doesn't matter if it personally offends you, your religion, or your personal opinion of freedom.
>>52744682
Forcing someone to raise an unwanted child is social freedom?
Expecting teenage mothers to bare the responsability of their acts but then refusing to actually teach them sex ed so they're uninformed and thus can't reasonably bear the responsability is social freedom?
>>52744840
they teach kids about sex far before they are even able to understand it nowadays. My sister watched a video of a live birth and fully knew about the sexual anatomy of both males and females when she was 11
>>52744840
You're not forcing them, they made a stupid mistake on their own. And I didn't say you can't teach them sex ed.
>>52744831
It doesn't offend me because of religion, it offends me to pay for people's own personal mistakes. And remember, we were talking about social freedom, not about costs, so don't move the goalpost. That being said, it would probably cost even less to find ways to minimize teenage pregnancy in the first place.
Conservative Centrism is the best ideology
>>52744899
>>52744920
We all know the american version of sex ed is abstinence
>>52744970
Am I in the literally Hitler section or just in the Enlightened Monarchist section?
>>52745014
There should be a balance of both sides. Kids shouldn't be taught that "ah fuck it, I can just get an abortion later", but, at the same time, they should be taught about more than just abstinence.
>>52745014
As it should be you fucking degenerate whore
Some of those questions are retarded
>>52745014
This has sure drifted quite far from debating who supports social freedom more.
This test is really left biased look at their election charts and see how far right they put Centre-Left Parties or just how far Right they put Centre-Right parties
>>52745193
Not really though.
You're arguing not paying for people's mistakes is social freedom.
Im saying denying these people the information on which decisions are made that lead to said mistakes isn't social freedom.
Also, being forced out of the educational system because of a mistake (for which you can't really be expected liable see previous) and thus forced into economic marginalization isn't social freedom either.
You don't want to pay for people's mistakes despite fixing these mistakes with abortions is far cheaper than paying for these mistakes through welfare.
So either way you're paying for their mistake, so either your focus on abortion is for another reason or you didnt think this through.
I consider myself more Authoritarian. just that the last set of questions (about homosexuality) put me in the libertarian section.
>>52743988
This literally makes no sense . maybe if it was a skinny white guy in flannel it would work.
>>52745374
If you did something to screw up your own life, forcing other people to fix that is not freedom. You had the choice to not make the mistake. In fact, maybe their SHOULD be consequences so less people make it in the first place. Ideally, the mistakes should be prevented.
> for which you can't really be expected liable see previous
Penis in vagina causes pregnancy. Everyone knows this even without sex education. If you get yourself pregnant, you damn well knew what you were doing. That being said, I never said that sex education should be denied.
Okay, so what does this make me in the eyes of you guize
>>52745500
I see, so you care about your social freedom but not that of others.
This seems to be a recurring american theme.
At any rate my last line still applies, you're electing to pay more for their mistakes through welfare than you would through abortions which makes me think this isn't about social freedom at all.
Economic Left/right: -6.38
Social libertarian/authoritarian: 0.05
>>52745589
You aren't pay more is you prevent the mistakes in the first place. Also, I think you may have the wrong definition of freedom. Freedom is the powr to act how you want without hindrance. You do not have freedom to have someone else do somthing for you. That's doesn't make sense.
>>52745589
Then cut out welfare programs and let the whores starve to death.
>>52745644
Like it or not: not being pidgeonholed into economic marginalization is also social freedom.
You're moving the goalposts, you went from
>Im not paying for abortions
to
>Im not paying for peoples mistakes
to
>Im not paying for peoples mistakes but I will pay for them indirectly through statefunded sex ed
>>52745731
(You)
surprise surprise
>>52745176
Yup.
>A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system.
Most retarded statement of them all. I had to agree but that doesn't mean I'm in favor of such a system at all.
>>52745795
I never moved the goalposts, I started out against paying for abortions, and I'm still talking about not paying for abortions. Paying for abortions falls under the category of paying for mistakes, so I don't see how I'm moving it there. Paying for education is not paying to fix people's mistakes. And you're not being "pidgenholed" into anything. IF you got yourself pregnant, you damn well knew what you were doing.
>>52745906
shit, I didn't mean to capitalize if
>>52745731
If we were "literally" retarded then how would we have been able to read through the whole test? Pick some more colorful words, pal.
>>52745936
Careful with that moonshine, Cleetus :^)
>>52742857
SJWs, Nazis and Commies are all Socially Authoritarian and Economically Socialist though.
>all the socialist fuckwits ITT
Kill yourselves desu
>>52746069
>picking more coloUrful words for retards
>implying retards could understand anything more "colorful"
You are literally retarded. Literally.
>>52742166
I seem to have drifted left-er of centre, lot of those questions I really don't give a shit about
>>52745500
You can say the same about any service that uses taxes
you got hit by a car and broke a leg? Sorry, your fault, forcing other people to fix that is not freedom! I know you can't work anymore, but you had the choice to not make the mistake of crossing the street. Everyone knows crossing streets is dangerous.
>>52745614
I'd call myself a Social Democrat, but in your map I'd be a Libertarian Socialist.
>>52746275
You can easily get medical problems through no fault of your own. You have to know exactly what you are doing to get pregnant.
>>52743943
go back to reddit
Here's a unique one
Catholic Distributism, yo
>>52746529
Absolutely disgusting
>>52745614
>Centrism is now Liberalism
That's cheating, majority of people out there are centrists.
>>52746593
>thinking of liberal as in the yank sense of the word
>>52746555
I feel like the quiz has a bias towards Libertarianism, because it's really hard to get the dot into the top half. To get Authoritarianism in their view, you have to be pro-death penalty and pro-military, which I'm not. But although pretty much every question was answered with a conservative mind, it only puts me on the line.
>>52746785
I really care little about your social stance, it's your economic stance I find disgusting.
>>52745552
An English student at the University of Melbourne
>>52746308
I'm a Democratic Socialist desu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQqZ8btcbyE
(There are English subtitles, but you have to turn them on)
Seems pretty normal to me
>>52743943
>(You)
>>52743357
I got put into libertarian left and I don't support any of the shit you just said. If you wanna blame someone, blame the test.
Also, conservatives enjoy messing with people's bedrooms and life decisions, so fuck that.
Kind of interesting considering that I strongly dislike Muslims, and dislike Jews, Indians, and hispanics, and strongly support gun rights and marijuana legalization
>people are unironically in the green
cuckolds OUT
Last year when I took it I was in the green(red box), can't care to take it again at 4:30AM so placed predicted trend.
>>52747831
>there are people that unironically think anarcho-socialism is possible, let alone good
seems reasonable
>>52742166
>>52742166
k
>>52749348
0/10
>>52749549
Hello Mao-tse-tsung.
Please don't shoot me and charge the bullet on my family.
>all yuros are communist faggots
>some still think their views are conservative
Not surprising.
>>52747438
Conservatism exists to maintain order and keep people responsible. Society doesn't work when people do whatever they want to. People become irresponsible, lazy, demanding and . Conservative morals lift us from our primal urges and allow us to do something with our lives, free of vices which evidently cannot coexist with an honest, successful working life, such as drugs and unrestrained sexual immorality.
It doesn't even have anything to do with religion, it's about helping people be the most mature, civil, refined human beings possible; capable, independent and free.
>>52749718
yes
also, praise be god
faggots die
>>52744969
Your tax dollars go to fund shit that is far more useless and unwanted than getting rid of unwanted future burdens on society, but neither you nor anybody else is complaining about it. Easily-available abortion directly benefits you and society at large far more than what most of your tax dollars go to.
>>52749718
Thanks for proving for everyone why Islam is the best choice.
the rest of you are just degenerates.
>>52749549
>>52749348
>>52748954
>>52747004
>>52746529
>>52745899
>>52745451
>>52745368
>>52743943
>>52743647
>>52743559
consider suicide
>>52745166
>there are now redneck evangelicals shitposting on 4chan
thanks /pol/
>>52745561
best graph
>>52747534
>unironically using an old meme and expecting to be taken seriously
>>52749718
This makes absolutely no sense. Conservatism is the ideology that appeals to '''''''nature''''''' and religion in order to tell people what they can and can't do, even when they end up doing it underground anyway under conservative regimes. The average conservative would rather see people stay in abusive marriages than make divorce freely available and oppose safe injection sites and treating addicts as patients in favor of letting them loose to cause more social problems because muh degeneracy. Conservative ''''''morals'''''' amount to pushing things that people will always do underground to create even greater societal issues, crime, etc. because allowing people to live their lives as they want makes conservatives feel butthurt and uncomfortable.
>>52750057
>If undesirable things are illegal, then when people do them, they'll be breaking the law!
>Better legalise literally fucking everything to make dangerous things seem okay, rather than actually tackling the issue!
Hmm...
>>52750057
>US Flag
>Region set to fucking BC
Turn off the proxy, Chang.
>>52750160
kek
>>52750132
>dangerous things
Too bad every country that's decriminalized drugs has seen addiction rates stabilize or decrease and overdose rates plummet.
Too bad extremely conservative societies still tend to have horrible drug epidemics, despite harsh punishments towards users.
Too bad the extremely conservative American regions have the highest rates of degeneracy in regards to teen pregnancy, alcoholism and addiction, welfare use, spousal abuse, etc.
Too bad most of the things conservatives get their panties in a bunch over aren't even harmful.
It's a real shame that the moral fabric of society doesn't seem to react well towards conservative '''''guidance'''''', isn't it?
>>52750160
Did you forget that it's a holiday, or are you just pretending to be retarded?
Welp
I think I would be in the center, or in the right if it wasn't for my atheism and rejection of religion entirely. 3nd time doing this test and I always end up around this area.
i support donald trump
>>52750357
>authoritarian left
Literally kill yourself
3d one is better
>Inb4 buttblasted right-wing teenagers
>>52742166
Your Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -3.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.26
looked just like OPs
>>52750403
>Literally near exact center
>Kill yourself
Dont you have a brushfire to put out?
r8
>>52750865
Stephen Harper/Adolf Hitler
Apply yourself
>>52750001
>>52750001
This, but if you place in the top two squares you're a statist cocksucker.
And I'm unapologetic about it.
>>52750786
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/joke
>>52750965
I could say the same m8
>>52749718
Ishalla the infidels will realize this soon!
>>52750136
heil hitler am i right
>>52750951
Hello ghandi
reminder that anything above +2 on vertical axis is not okay
>>52751145
He had some great ideas, to be quite honest with you.
>>52742166
this is a bullshit test
>>52751145
where in FL?
>>52750541
Link?
>>52751146
Ghandi was OK, I don't agree with him 100% though.
I identify more with Abdullah Ocalan desu.
>>52752025
>>52752210
>>52749718
>Actually believing this
It must be good to have others make decisions for you and thinking those people are flawless and morally upstanding. Always.
Because it's worked so well in the past.
>>52752244
spic
>>52752244
e-spic
Considering my stances on the importance of business, immigration policies, and my lax thoughts of the legal system, I'm amazed I got such a middling spot. I'm guessing the questions about sexuality were weighed a little more heavier than the others.
>>52750057
Been here since '07, /pol/ had nothing to do with my shitposting you literal baby.
>>52750951
Hello, friend.
The only right answer.
Also since nobody here can distinguish the difference, yes you can be a liberal without subscribing to all the SJW, black lives matter, feminist, [insert nonsense here]. Those liberals live in the top left of this chart. The sane ones live in the bottom left.
I find this result to be pretty interesting. But also fairly accurate. I think I am further down on the authoritarian scale, but I guess I compromise too much to be a true libertarian.
I always consider my self to be centre right but sometimes I feel I'm too empathetic towards the plight of others.
hi
>>52756495
This is surprisingly acurate
>>52742166
>I don't suck corporate cock so I'm left wing
I put stuff like our race is better, people with diseases shouldn't reproduce, introduce capital punishment etc.
>>52750001
Nick Clegg pls go
>>52756598
Poland right wing here.
so it turns out most of /int/ is actually leftist.
/pol/ is working well as a containment board.
>>52756875
The quiz is shit m8
>Do you think corporations should be allowed to do whatever they want?
>No
>CONGRATULATIONS YOU'RE LEFT WING
>>52756862
PiS
>>52756895
PO, palikot i nowoczesna
>>52756911
Because on left there is no space for corporations.
there is only goverment companies.
Saved this last time I took the test ages ago, cbf doing it again.
>>52756957
Left and right is shit desu, politics is nowhere near as simple as that.
Just because you want some control doesn't mean you want government companies. The government might as well be another company desu don't really see what's different if they owned companies.
>>52742166
This test is so hilariously loaded and bad.
>If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
Implying they can not both be in the interested of humanity.
>People are ultimately divided more by class than by nationality.
What i answer to this does not imply anything about my political stance. I frankly agree with it but don't think a class divide is problematic.
>Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment.
Whatever i answer says nothing about what i think is the best way to go about it.
>It's a sad reflection on our society that something as basic as drinking water is now a bottled, branded consumer product.
I half agree, but it's a sad reflection on the people who buy that, not the system that allows it.
>When you are troubled, it's better not to think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.
This must be a dummy question.
>What's good for the most successful corporations is always, ultimately, good for all of us.
Nothing says i have to think it should be.
>>52757063
I agree with all your points, Bjorn. Do you know of any better tests?
>>52756920
Ale ja lubię PiS ;__;
>>52757221
There aren't any
>>52757255
fug
>>52757255
LIterally type "political test" in Google and thousands pop up.
>>52757323
They're all shit though.
Based or not lads?
can some brit explain?
Many of the questions seem to be loaded with liberal bias to be honest. Shit test.
>mfw despite all the racist banter and shit talking /int/ is still left wing
I knew it all along.
>>52757583
>economic left = liberal SJW
Epic
>>52757583
at the end of the day /int/ is the normie board
>>52757708
This
>>52757636
almost everyone ITT is socially libertarian you autist
>>52757636
I would say I am pretty socially left, too. I am not sure that I would quite fit the stereotype image of SJW, but that is a rather hyperbolic image.
>>52757737
That isn't the same as left-wing either you autist.
>>52757237
Zmień swoje poglądy na bardzie konserwatywne.
Zero aborcji
więcej koscioła
więcej władzy dla pisu.
mniej swobód ale większy porządek i bezpieczeństwo
>>52757737
>socially libertarian
Reddit is down the hallway and to the left if you really think modern "liberals" have anything to do with classic liberalism, even /pol/ is closer to it.
i'd put myself on bottom-right desu. this test has many unrelated questions to general politic view.
Need to get a little more central. It's the best of both worlds.
>>52752244
>walls offend me
>>52742223
>>52742166
>>52742780
>>52742787
>>52743153
>>52743231
>>52743457
>>52743539
>>52743647
>>52743613
>>52743943
>>52744046
>>52744771
>>52745368
>>52745176
>>52745451
>>52745552
>>52745622
>>52745899
>>52746257
>>52746529
>>52747004
>>52749348
>>52750556
>>52750890
If you needed any proof that /int/ is full of teenage faggots, here it is
Is this thread satire? Or is /int/ really full of NEET neckbeards and limp wristed students who have never worked a day in their lives?
r8, what am I?
>>52745614
>anarcho-anythingism
why do people insist on this meme?
>/int/ is economically illiterate
who'd have guessed
The further away from the centre you are, the more retarded-delusional you are.
>>52758197
How so?
>>52757842
/pol/ is just anti-popularism, they go against the flow no matter what that opinion is. If liking slavery would be cool thing in 2016, they'd fucking go full on anti-slavery mode.
>>52758529
you've described most of 4chan culture
>>52758119
have you ever been to /brit/
>>52758529
Contrarian is a better word than anti-popularism, as it contains that whole idea in fewer letters and syllables.
>>52758685
>>52757984
Your post doesn't look mature, m8.
Accurate I guess, though I find economic libertarianism absolutely disgusting.
>>52742166
>>52742780
>>52742787
>>52743153
>>52743231
>>52743457
>>52743539
>>52743647
>>52743943
>>52744046
>>52744771
>>52745176
>>52745368
>>52745451
>>52745552
>>52745622
>>52745899
>>52746257
>>52747004
>>52750556
>>52750890
>>52750951
>>52752613
>>52755160
>>52755265
>>52755420
>>52756695
>>52756706
>>52756895
>>52756962
>>52757354
>>52757375
>>52757764
>>52757850
>>52758455
>>52758801
This is definite proof that /int/ is full of redditors.
Please kill yourselves.
