>>52445361
Why would we put a British person on our money?

>>52445361
That note went of production and Charles Darwin was replaced by Jane Austen.

Britain will never fuck my asshole

le epin christianity vs science false dilemma thread :----DDD

>>52445423
I've literally never seen a Jane Austen note, only ever seen the Charles Darwins.

>>52445361

>Still having an official church

fuck off brit

>>52445475
>I've literally never seen a Jane Austen note, only ever seen the Charles Darwins.
>http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/literally-psyched/jane-austen-is-replacing-charles-darwin-and-thats-a-very-good-thing/

>The legacy of a Charles Darwin is not to be underestimated, nor his importance to knowledge to be slighted. But the legacy of a Jane Austen is no less crucial.

rustled my Jimmies t

Is British money really that ugly?

>>52445475
Excuse me, Jane Austen has replaced Charles Darwin and will be on the next 10 pound note(so around 2017 or so)

>>52445593
>Rustled
When is this meant to happen? The site says it's from 2013, but I've literally never seen a Jane Austen note

>>52445655
>When is this meant to happen?
I guess the next time the central bank of england puts out a new note, every website i read this on exceapt the BBC didnt have a timeframe(around 2017) and made it sound like it was taking place immediately.

>tfw you see the all seeing eye on the back of a dollar bill
>tfw you're reminded that this country was better when it was ruled by freemasons and ruined by retarded southerners like jackson

>Country's national anthem is about a fictional character saving a figurehead.
>Makes fun of country for referencing that character next to the illuminati symbol