Are libbies resorting to ad hominem now?
What do you mean now? They always resort to ad hominem. It's always muh feels and bullshit of that sort. For a party that preaches tolerance and not to generalize, they are incredibly intolerant and generalize those who don't agree with them.
>>52385041
Todays liberals are ironically left wing autoritarians. Theyre literrally fascists
>/pol/lack complaining about ad hominems
Lmao it is a fucking study they weren't attacking anyone. Do studies trigger you now because they expose your bigoted views? /pol/lack playing the victim card, fucking classic.
>>52385208
>Study
>purpose of study is literally to make fun of the opposition
>"study"
It's backhanded and childish.
And 19% of Dems answered the same way, people in slightly less glass made houses shouldn't smear shit on the walls.
>>52384952
i have never heard of agrabah, even tho i watched aladin in the theatres
but i wuld support bombing it
I don't understand
>Do you support bombing Agrabah Y/N
No matter whether you choose Y or N, you've still taken seriously a survey that asks you about bombing Aladdin
Is the joke that Public Policy Polling is being taken seriously?
>>52385041
>>52385320
>making fun of
No, that wasn't their intent at all. They were seeing if republicans had a more biased view towards Islamic sounding names than democrats did.
Genie, no!
>>52384952
>now
>>52385458
>They were seeing if republicans had a more biased view towards Islamic sounding names than democrats did.
But the headline emphasizes only one part of the respondents.
In Aladdin most of humanity is long dead.
That'll just agrabahte the situation
>>52385452
I would support bombing Aladdin.
>>52385452
The real problem from what I saw isn't that they picked a town from a Disney movie that frankly could be a town in bum fuck nowhere ME; it's that the question made no reference to what Agrabah had supposedly done or the reason for bombing it.
>>52385665
They just said do you support bombing Agrabah? And gave no additional information? Fantastic.
>>52385665
>it's that the question made no reference to what Agrabah had supposedly done or the reason for bombing it
That's the point. There's a 'Don't know' option they could've picked as well.
>>52385702
And 19% of democratic primary voters still supported bombing it
>all this right-wing butthurt
>the republicans' main candidate is a living meme who has no chance of beating based bernie
>literally the only people voting for trump will be the same pissed-off old people who voted for romney
LOL
>>52385550
That is because the its a fucking article trying to get you to click it for the $$$
>>52385762
>no chance of beating based bernie
Bernie has no chance of beating anyone.
>>52385762
>Bernie 'muh gommie homie' Sanders
>win
Hillary has this in the sack
>>52385702
See pic
>>52385702
You're right, but I can't help but feel like it's dishonest in some way.
>>52385762
leaf
>>52385762
>>52385882
Hillary is a fucking shill, if her or Trump become president I'm moving to Canada.
>>52385955
>If the person I want to win, doesn't win, I'm quitting and leaving the country!
Loser.
>>52385550
So 49% of Democrats have a foreign policy position on a fictional city, wheras only 43% of Republicans do.
Democrats confirmed for thicko retards.
>>52385955
Make sure to ask your parents to vote for Trump, then.
>>52386348
Sorry, my maths is wrong. 55% of Democrats actually have a foreign policy position on a fictional city. A fucking majority!
>>52386513
Republicans have a 30% support if the total was 43 people
Democrats have a 52% support to bomb it
What we can conclude is that americans are ignorant dumbfucks, or atleast seniles who get their news from popular media only
I wish that there was a way to test the answers for irony.
>>52385208
Remember when Penn and Teller got liberals to sign a petition to ban water?
http://youtu.be/yi3erdgVVTw