Well /int/ ?
http://strawpoll.me/6307927
WE
>>52362727
Also, I meant.
What would happen if both had nukes and allies or when both had none.
What would be the outcome?
>no nukes
>no allies
Status quo ante bellum
>nukes
>allies
Turkey
didn't Turkey BTFO French and Greeks? they could BTFO Russia's pathetic army
>>52362727
Stupid question, really, because Turkey is in NATO, so if they did have allies and nukes, they would have the nuclear capacity of US, UK, France and Germany. Russia would be beat easily.
Jews
>>52362959
In their War of Independence they won on three fronts, beating the Armenians in the east, Greeks in the West and France in the middle, if I recall that correctly.
>>52362727
>implying you can get pass S400 air defense system
>>52362727
>The world
Well that's just too obvious.
>>52362727
>no nukes
wat
I think the Russians would obliterate Turkey 1 on 1.
>>52363123
Without nukes or allies, Russia's army is considerably stronger, but the difference is way too small for a successful invasion/occupation.
It would simply be a stalemate, heavy losses on both sides.
We got this
>>52363163
Does Turkey have any kind of strategic weaponry? If not, that puts Russia at an advantage.
>>52362727
Obligatory
>>52363299
What do you mean by "strategic weaponry"?
>>52363302
>expanded edition
Holy shit saved
>>52362727
>no nukes
>no allies
Russia if on Russian territory.
Inconclusive if on Turkish territory.
>nukes
>allies
Turkey if on Russian territory.
No war if on Turkish territory. Because Russians only fuck with those they know are weaker.
>>52363283
Underrated post
>>52363346
This is what I said too, completely agreed.
>>52363302
Kekked, last pic is a bit unclear though, the ISIS guy on the ground should be drawn more clearly.
>>52363323
Anything that could hit Russian population centers. Bombers, subs, cruise missiles, etc.
As far as I know Turkey doesn't have that capability.
>>52363495
Turkey is the 5th most powerful army on Earth. Of course they do.
>>52363669
>USA
>Russia
>China
>India
>France
>UK
doubt.jpg
>>52363699
I stand corrected: 5th in Europe
>>52364002
10th on the buisness insider thing
>>52362962
>nuclear capacity of Germany.
Sorry m8, we are not allowed to have nukes according to the 2+4 treaty.
Za warudo
>>52362727
The one with thousands of nukes?
Turkey doesn't have modern weaponry, it can't damage anything that is more than several dozen killometers far from its border or coastal line.
It can try to ship several thousands of irregulars aka 'moderate oppositioners' to caucasus and that's pretty much it.
>>52362727
>Russian GPS malfunctions
>they can't find Turkey
>>52363302
50 years later...
British invasion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallipoli_Campaign
Russian invasion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergmann_Offensive
Both btfo.
>>52363302
nice edit lel
>>52364603
>Turkey doesn't have modern weaponry
Turkey has superiour western weaponry, Russia only has outdated soviet shit.
>>52364763
>Russian GPS malfunctions
>Accidentally walks into Crimea
>>52364603
Turkey is a NATO member. Turkey has whatever the fuck they want.
>>52363011
french in the south(east). but to be honest, france didn't really try too much to hold on to the land. They fought, but not like the Armenians and the greeks
>>52365081
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergmann_Offensive
>in every single subsequent Russian offensive during the Caucasus Campaign until the revolution t*rks get btfo
mehmet my son
e
>>52365418
NATO isn't charity organisations, it's marketing campaign for murrican military producing complex.
turkey doesn't have whatever the fuck they want, they have what they bought and that's the cheapest crap you can think of.
>>52362727
>>52362727
Humanity.
>>52365945
>Ottoman High Command recognizing the dire situation on other fronts, decided that this region was of secondary importance. As of January 1916, Ottoman forces were 126,000 men, only 50,539 being combat soldiers. There were 74,057 rifles, 77 machine guns and 180 pieces of artillery. Many of the guns which were supposed to defend the city had been moved to Gallipoli to counter the British forces.
In a 1v1 it would be a status quo m8.
>>52366072
World War I is a Russian victory too pretty much, Crimean War doesn't count because Turks would have gotten BTFO by Russians easily, but when actual humans (French, Brits) joined the fight, Russia stood no chance.
>>52362727
Turkish nukes can't reach Russia and what allies? Polacks and Chechens? Turkey needs F-35s to have a chance against Russia, not cannon fodder.
>>52362727
What kind of a stupid question is this? If Russia doesn't have any nukes, then the entire NATO combined could nuke them off the map.
>>52363495
>>52363669
We do not have any bombers, but have some subs and cruise missiles. We aren't capable of projecting significant force on a country like Russia, no.
>>52362727
No nukes and allies: Matushka Rossiya
Nukes and allies: Mutual destruction
>>52362727
The side who has Putin
>>52364002
>in europe
>>52370380
>Eastern thrace fags in nutshell
Wow this really became a meme after all.
>>52362909
t. Mehmet Kaya
>>52372265
It gets better, I've seen them post about how turks are actually 100% slavic
