Can we all agree that 19th century Europe was the highest point that human civilisation has achieved?
>>52218262
/thread
>romanticizing the past
>>52218248
Europoors dying in the battelfield for their masters. Kids working 14 hours in dirty factories. Yeah, sure.
>>52218296
>not romanticizing the past
What are you, a Muslim with no history?
Can we all agree that 17th century Europe was the highest point that human civilisation has achieved?
Can we all agree that 2015 is the lowest point that human civilisation has fallen?
>>52218296
a symptom of pessimism
>>52218469
I thought that americans were optimistic.
>>52218309
>Let me not then die ingloriously and without a struggle, but let me first do some great thing that shall be told among men hereafter.
>>52218479
true
hence we make so much sci fi stuff
>>52218447
no.
Can we all agree that every point in time before 2015 was a lower point in the state of human civilisation, and every point in the future will obviously be higher?
>>52218248
Can we all agree that this thread belong to /his/ ?
>>52218377
Honestly I'm surprised you didn't post Gustavus Adolphus.
>>52218479
How can they romanticize something they don't have? hence why they are so butthurt
>>52218377
If you're a cuck nation that lost every major battle it fought.
Can we all agree that 16th century Europe was the highest point that human civilisation has achieved?
>>52218530
we don't like the founding fathers just so we can not romanticize them
>>52218500
Even the steppe hordes managed to conquer a huge part of the world.
It all came to nothing in the end however.
>>52218368
well Bulgaria has seen better days as far as relative success is concerned
but the absolute values of our quality of life are above anything our ancestors knew
life is simply better now pretty much everywhere thanks to technology.
>>52218590
Then why all this head stuck in past glories bullshit?
>>52218590
>came to nothing
>Islam has 1.6 billion followers
>your shitty island is rapidly islamifying
Lmao
>>52218500
sand and goatfuckers
>>52218529
They are both great, but i just fucking love this shit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_Across_the_Belts
>>52218651
Je suis paris lmao
>>52218653
I'm not in the mood to read much right now, I'm tired and I've got shit to do in the morning. I just posted it because Sabaton.
>>52218644
>ad populum
Come back with a serious argument.
>>52218529
looks like a fucking potato
>>52218764
Well he was European royalty.
>>52218795
>implying European royalty isn't based
>>52218893
how much of a cuck are you, filthy peasant?
>>52218929
How much of a communist are you?
>>52218956
Not at all, but you avoiding my question means that you are a massive cuck.
Of course that was clear when you called royalty "based". Fucking dumb nigger lmao
>>52218893
>>52218956
>is British
>is a royalist
the memes were true
>>52218994
kill yourself, Muslim
>>52218377
Obviously this
>>52218248
Yes.
t. Prussian
>>52218248
Ummayad MENA was the best m80
>>52219144
scum of the earth cuckold
your queen is a ho
>>52219228
Scum of the earth shitskin.
Fuck off back to your desert wasteland.
>>52219320
your queen is a ho
>>52218893
this
>>52219320
your queen is a ho
>>52218893
Based Louis the Great
>>52219320
(y)our queen is a ho
>>52219354
>>52219365
t. alberto barbosa
>>52219320
Your 'queen' is a ho
>>52218248
> Not the Age of Discovery
ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING
>>52219320
your queen is a ho
>>52219320
Your queen is a ho
Can we all agree that Upper Paleolithic Europe was the highest point that human civilisation has achieved?
have you guys know that the doctors who did autopsy later assisted births which lead to high infant mortality rates?
literally
they just didnt wash their hands
this was a scientific breakthrow keep babies alive
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis
>>52219593
People didn't know a lot of shit back then.
Computers had to be invented you know. They didn't just start existing.
>>52219168
No, I can't agree simply because of the medical and general technological advancements, which were more pronounced then, as in "under the microscope"...
We know everything went "wrong" after the introduction of national economies and most importantly the steam engine. And people in this thread will obviously say the best century is the one when their country shined
I think the best years to romanticize but not get negative replies like "what about the 12 hour working chilluns n smog n mass colonialism n low wages n shit" is from 1700 to 1789
You still have hunger, dying from temperature and pesky wars but there are lesser people, meaning lesser competition and lesser resource fighting, a semblance of "peaceful" feudal-bourgeois societal model, colonial efforts that are not on a millionth scale, because there's no coordinated extermination of people (at least not from Europeans - Spaniards did the Moriscos already, height of Ottoman power is gone...) fuck it I'm on my phone, can't squint anymore
>>52219642
but this isnt some complex thing
just wash your hands after taking poo to the loo tier common sense
>>52218368
lmao leave it up to a country with no future to romanticise the past
>19th century
>Mal du siècle
>Misery
thanks but no
No. USA in the 1980s will always be the ideal society. It had some problems, but there was sense of unity and hope.
