Thoughts?
>>52203030
You are a big country
>>52203030
>Puerto Rico is 80% white
Got one for non-hispanic white senpai?
>>52203066
What if Mexico takes this Texas back?
>>52203030
>>52203097
The Puerto Ricans there are white while the ones that come here are mulattoes.
>>52203106
Why?
>>52203226
Why post this?
Hispanic isn't a race.
>>52203277
nice try juan
>>52203309
I'm English and Dutch m8.
And my point stands. Hispanic is more of an all encompassing culture, not a race.
Original map is more accurate.
>>52203030
Nearly all American states are whiter than South Brazil. So that's very nice, USA still very white.
>>52203277
t. Sanchez
There are clear visual differences between hispanics and non-hispanics
>>52203226
Interesting
Replace Hispanics with pacific Islanders, Blacks with Abos and New Hampshire is pretty much the same as Queensland
>>52203410
As with most Southern Europeans and Northern Europeans.
They're like wogs in Australia. Except they get their own category that also includes nig nogs and Native Americans from Latin America in the same boat.
>>52203524
applies to oranges bait map
compare white and blacks within their state
>>52203568
>applies to oranges bait map
>compare white and blacks within their state
It's not apples and oranges to say that Southern whites are less educated, poorer, and less healthy than Northern blacks
>>52203066
Checked :)
>>52203397
I read on Wikipedia that the average person in South Brazil is 77% European genetically, while the average Hispanic here is 65% genetically European.
Would you take our beaners?
>>52203630
Ok?
What's the purpose of the little bit at the bottom?
You can make the same judgement about blacks nationally to whites nationally, or blacks in any one state to whites in the same state.
It's like comparing Slavs in Russia to blacks in the UK. Their superiority is only situational. Has nothing to do with culture or the like.
Plus it's race bait, so fuck you.
>>52203782
It means Southern whites are garbage
