/int/, should free migration be permitted? According to economists, free migration would double the world's real GDP.
whos this schlong sorcerrer?
I would migrate into ur sisters vanilla pussy and butthole :D
>>52145239
>According to economists, free migration would double the world's real GDP.
hahahahahahahaha
>>52145515
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.25.3.83
According to liberal c'ucks...*
Fix'd.
>>52145239
If all welfare is removed and immigrants who misbehave are deported forever, sure.
>>52145581
Horribly outdated t bh and 15-20 people is hardly economic consensus.
The countries that benefit most from migrants at the moment e.g. USA do so largely because of controlled immigration. Of course its beneficial to your economy if you're poaching the cream of the crop, the wealth, educated, skilled.
Having the 3rd world move into 1st world countries would bring ruin, not improvement.
A more even distribution of wealth to poorer countries would certainly improve the world as a whole and spur overall global growth hugely, but that will never happen.
>>52145239
>and this is why America will be heavily jihaded throughout my lifetime
>and they will still blame the NRA
>>52145766
>deported forever
It doesn't work like that.
>>52145876
Wrong. It would only bring ruin to the displaced employees.
The rest of the world would get more goods produced for fewer resources invested.
>A more even distribution of wealth to poorer countries would certainly improve the world as a whole and spur overall global growth hugely, but that will never happen.
What do you think has been happening in China and India?
>>52145581
Theoretically this would work. The theory doesn't account for mudslimes and dindus.
>>52146112
Sorry, I will correct it then. A substantially* more even distribution.
Scales tip over time, economies and empires rise and fall. Ignoring all actual figures/facts, its possible that China and India could be huge contenders in the future but even if they were so, do you think they would be content at evening out? No. It would swing one way or the other as it always has. People are selfish and greedy.
>>52146112
>displaced employees
Do you seriously believe that European countries that are already some of the most densely populated on earth could cope with the equivalent of literally their entire population or more turning up? How can you be so deluded?
The logistics and cost of it alone, even to maintain basic human rights would cause those countries to collapse.
>>52145347
Shouldn't you be out practicing your horseback archery skills?
only until every person on earth understands religion and other spooks are shit and respect other races
i.e. never because humans are fucking stupid
>>52146220
They will still work more than their home countries, like it or not. That might not at first grow the aggregated world GDP. The job he took will be only less for nationals, that on the other hand will migrate to other country and that altogether is what will raise world`s GDP.
>>52145581
>not a single Jew
/pol/ can`t say shit this time.
>>52145239
>According to economists
according to some of them breaking windows raises GDP
>>52147682
It does tho
>>52147866
>>52148031
top kek
