>A US town has rejected a proposal for a solar farm following public concerns.
>Jane Mann, a retired science teacher, said she was concerned the panels would prevent plants in the area from photosynthesizing, stopping them from growing.
>Ms Mann said she had seen areas near solar panels where plants are brown and dead because they did not get enough sunlight.
>She also questioned the high number of cancer deaths in the area, saying no one could tell her solar panels didn't cause cancer.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-town-rejects-solar-panels-amid-fears-they-suck-up-all-the-energy-from-the-sun-a6771526.html
>>52098779
I think a SCIENCE TEACHER knows a bit more about it than you, OP
>>52098827
A British science teacher might.
well she's not wrong
I think this town should also ban oxygen
after all, it is a proven fact that EVERY person who breathes air containing oxygen is about to die at some point
>>52098985
She's completely wrong, you dummy.
>>52098779
if they gave the plants guns they could defend themselves
>science teacher
More like a....RETARDED science teacher hahaha
Its good she blocked the solar panels since they're inefficient and a waste of money, but she is clearly retarded and her arguments are more so retarded.
>>52098779
>solar panel
>produces electricity for like 4 hours a day
yeah nah
muh go green lefttards BTFO
I refuse to believe in this shit
I just can't.....
>>52099331
about what
>american teachers
>>52099741
Go be a completely retard contrarian somewhere else, Billy Joe
Teaching is considered a low pay garbage job in the USA. Old saying in the USA is "Those that can; do. Those that can't; teach". The "think of the children!!!" people give all teachers undeserved respect because they teach kids.
>his country bought into the "renewable energy" meme
Shoulda accepted keystone, dummies
>>52099849
solar panels block sunlight on whatever is below it causing it to become unhealthy
why is this wrong
there is no established link between solar panels and caner
why is this wrong
and how am i being contrarian
>>52098779
i've worked it out. solar panels are actually duel purpose genocidal weapons created by the lizard people that converts harmless solar rays and converts it into radioactive waves that also affect plants because plants have leaves on them and everyone knows that's a huge mistake except canada.
>>52099952
No thanks, Wang Kong Pao.
>>52098779
>science teacher
>>52099970
You are obviously disrupting straightforward information in order to create a disturbance in the topic at hand
Or you are simply to stupid and have none to zero reading comprehension
>>52100685
>Or you are simply to stupid and have none to zero reading comprehension
Tell me how you got this at least
>>52100762
She's telling everyone "dem things cause cancer! ain't nobody gon tell me otherwise"!
>>52100858
she actually didn't make the link
she said lots of cancer and no one can connect it to solar panels
>>52098779
This is good comedy.
I like it.
Maybe you should build some wind farms in Tornado Valley usaians, the windmills might just steal the wind from the cyclones and huricanes!
>>52099971
at least someone gets it
>>52099971
No. That's what they want you to think.
The solar panels are a diversion.
The actual scheme has to do with the land the solar farm is going be build on, there are ancient magical laylines on that particular plot and the evil necromantic cult of the Shekelstein family will use it for it's heretical death rituals.
>>52099970
>solar panels block sunlight on whatever is below it causing it to become unhealthy
It's not wrong, but it's an irrelevant argument she brought up. The area affected by the solar panels is negligible, unless she's implying solar panels are actually black holes that cause light to bend towards them and thus suck out all sunlight in the city.
>there is no established link between solar panels and caner
Yes, but she's claiming otherwise. Or rather, she's shifting the burden of proof. If she thinks solar panels might cause cancer, she's the one who needs to bring forth evidence to support the claim.
>>52099896
Surely you need at the very least a bachelor's degree in your subject to teach it at high school level, right? Right?
>>52102456
It depends on your state, actually.
>>52102396
The thing is - for her to know the burden of proof is on the person proposing a thesis, would imply she actually knows something about science and the scientific method.
>>52102456
in massachusetts you need a master's degree to teach at any level.
>>52102456
You need a master's degree to teach at any level, at least in my state.
>>52104364
>a master to teach highschool math
really? sounds like overkill
>>52098779
That's nothing, OP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1AbLu5EZLk
>>52104774
>not "they cost too much" / "they're not necessary" / "they slow down traffic" or anything like that
>no, it's "I don't like seeing the paint on the ground when I look outside my window"
jesus christ fuck soccer moms
>>52104774
ah for fucks sake, seriously. this is rage enticing
>>52104774
That's stupid.
Those people should be shot.
>>52099345
nice one, britboy.
>>52098779
Science won as always.
>>52104697
Maybe they have normal math in schools like we do.
>>52098779
>>52098827
>muh appeal to authority
sensibly lmaoing at your life
>science teacher
I think we're living in a dystopian future.
>>52104774
>women
>>52099345
Underrated post.
>>52099952
>>52100031
>keystone
Good god I'm getting tired of this politicized meme. America surface is already as vascular as your grandma's left thigh. Adding another pipeline wouldn't make a fucking difference.
>>52104284
There's a reason why the schools in MA are some of the best in the country.
