Canadians not welcome
Checking in
Fug u
>>52055097
Looks more fake than the moon landing tb_h family
>>52055126
We bought them from you, but okay... how's this one?
>>52055004
We have the entire US army at our disposal Tbh
checking in
>>52055242
Is that what you tell your buddies at work whIle your go gets fucked by an alpha american
>>52055389
I guarantee my C7 would like to hear that again.
>>52055389
t. Jamal Jiminez
Our army has Chinooks and Apache's I believe. And some other choppers, like the NH90.
>ITT very triggered canadians
>>52055504
t. Ooga Booga
>>52055097
Why is Michael Jackson in that helicoptor?
>>52055551
He didn't die, he's just flying helicopters up here now. Pretty cool guy 2bh
>>52055640
>canada
>helicopters
>>52055698
>american
>brain
NH(Nippon Heli)60j
>>52055783
>canada
>military
The only picture of an aircraft I have on my computer
The NH90 is a piece of shit to be somewhat honest with some of you.
>>52055797
Looks nice, think you could take Canada's military? What am I saying, of course you could
>>52055819
>america
>healthy weight
>>52055917
I'll post a fucking pic mate don't tempt me, leaf
>>52055927
What? the only overweight guy in Canada on a scooter?
He's probably originally from the USA 2tbh, no one born here is that fat
>>52055917
>Canada
>unhealthy amount of obsession with its southern neighbor
>>52055955
A pic of myself I meant
>>52055967
I'm touching you right now
>>52055980
>He wants to post a pic of himself on a japanese cartoon scribble board
You fit the standard that's for sure
>>52055986
*cums*
>>52055986
No, I'M touching YOU
>>52056026
oh bby ;^)
>>52056018
Post your jawline, leafy
>>52055004
Syrup?
>>52055097
is that a leftover from vietnam?
JAAAJJSHAHAHA
>>52056143
Why? I'm not the fat one here. Post yours if you're so insecure about yourself.
typical americunt always being a cunt
>>52056213
They were built in the 90s, my white european friend
>>52056226
This is why people don't like Canadian posters, they're eternally butthurt over America
But here's your proof anyway family
>>52056358
Are you like 16? you look like a kid 2bh
You're not fat, you must be an immigrant
>>52056397
>Canadenial
Kek
I don't get it
>>52056358
That's a nice jaw line
>>52056468
Thanks lad
>>52056396
>>52055004
Nobody likes the NH90.
>>52056634
>this mad
reported
>>52056659
I'm not mad, just having some fun m8
I think you're butthurt 2bh
>>52056634
You're welcome to post your own picture now, my leaf friend :^)
>>52056634
>He has a picture of a dick saved on his computer for situations like this
>>52056685
Nah, you seem mad
>>52056685
>>52056728
You're both mad
*makes u both kiss*
>>52056634
Wow family, I just wanted to compare aesthetics with you, that was a bit uncalled for
You may only reply to this post if your country has attack helicopters
>>52056772
Thanks for the invitation, did you send one to Canada? I mean, every developed nation has attack helicopters, right?
>>52056759
:^)
YEAH YEAH OUR MILITARY SUCKS
OUR AIRFORCE SUCKS
OUR NAVY SUCKS
OUR PM IS A C.U.C.K
SO WHAT?
ITS 2015
COME ON
>>52056787
Of course they'd have attack helicopters
They're in the G7 -- what nation which is supposed to be one of the 7 leading nations in the world wouldn't have attack helicopters? They're not some landlocked European micro nation
Bullying Canadians is fun.
>>52056821
This. Making fun of our military is dumb because we know it's pretty bad nowadays. At least our troops are still top notch even if our equipment isn't.
Thanks, Liberals.
>>52055004
Are we talking specifically about the NH90?
>>52056854
Of course they'd be top notch with the extensive military history of Canada
>>52056829
feels good
>>52056827
Now hold on a second, what's this?
http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.asp?form=form&country1=australia&country2=canada&Submit=COMPARE
Canada has
>ZERO
>HELICOPTERS
JESUS CHRIST CANADA EVEN FUCKING POLAND HAS ATTACK HELICOPTERS
>>52056884
We did just as much if not more than you guys did in WWII. Sure our modern warfare is sub-par mostly due to the liberals being in power for more than 20 years.
>>52057003
This, Canada got all the shit jobs from Britain and their role was underrated
>t.Canaboo
>>52056973
We're getting the H-92 Superhawk, things have been delayed due to poor planning by the liberals and incompetence by Sikorsky.
>>52056973
Why would we need attack helicopters?
We couldn't afford enough of them to actually make a difference in a country this big, so they'd be fucking useless.
Also, nice cherrypicking. We still beat Australia in number of helicopters, tanks, and artillery
>>52056973
Gotta be completely fair about this, they use the Griffons in that role which can be armed with 7.62 and .50 miniguns. That's still awful, but they do technically have something to fill the role with.
>>52055846
they allow pilots with bad eye sight in Japan?
I guess they have no choice
>>52056884
Not sure if banter or compliment
Because if it's banter you are an uneducated idiot, but if it's a compliment then thx u too
>>52057089
She's probably part of the crew.
>>52057089
>>52057097
Never take aussie posters seriously man.
>>52056772
You guys have attack helis?
>>52057121
Do you ever think we should let Japan have their military back? They've clearly proven they've lost all imperialistic interests these days. We can just tell them not to fuck with the Philippines or South Korea, and not to bother China without our help.
>Canada
>Writing "CANADA" on Canadian Army helos
That's some fucking insecurity issues you got there.
>>52057213
Do the Japs even have the will to fight anyone any more? I'm pretty sure you pummelled that out of them.
>>52056397
>Are you like 16?
>posts >>52056634
lmao ur fukn fuming cunt
>>52057213
>they've clearly lost their imperial interests
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nippon_Kaigi
Shinzo Abe is part of this group.
>>52057213
It's a trap
>>52057213
>we just tell them to not do the only things they can possibly do with a japanese military
nah
>>52056778
sori but this is mine
>>52057250
Yeah, it's gone now. I'm pretty sure that the modern Japan we have now is a side effect of the radiation.
>>52057213
They released many restrictions on their military this year. Hopefully they buy some Tomahawks now.
And the US leadership certainly wants Japan to become more active militarily. It'd take alot of pressure off of US naval forces in the Far East.
>>52057258
>"Nippon Kaigi fights against feminism, LGBT rights, and the 1999 Gender Equality Law."
based
>>52057258
>mobile link
kill yourself
>>52057232
It's the Government logo/tramp stamp you fag
Also, you do the same thing so don't even
meh
>>52057213
>According to a February 2014 report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service, Nippon Kaigi Kyokai believes that "Japan should be applauded for liberating much of East Asia from Western colonial powers", that "the 1946-1948 Tokyo War Crimes tribunals were illegitimate", and that "the killings by Imperial Japanese troops during the 1937 Nanjing massacre were exaggerated or fabricated".[3][16
The current prime minister of Japan, the guy who wants a unconstrained military, is a special advisor of this group.
Essentially the Japanese equivalent of the Nazi party has a dedicated member as the prime minister.
snug as a bug
>>52057346
>We were good liberators
>We dindu nuffin
That's our / Russias gimmick
>>52055389
Rude. We're all humans, after all.
No need for barbaric or tribal ideologies of separation and boundary.
>>52057308
I'm traveling home for Christmas.
>>52057301
They released a few restrictions. It's nowhere near what Abe wants.
Now they can react to an unjustified attack on an ally and sell military equipment to other nations, but offensive weaponry like Carriers is still off limits.
Oh and they aren't allowed to participate in most conflicts still, like the anti-ISIS coalition.
>>52055846
Here have another.
>>52057405
Granted, as a Nisei, I generally like Shinzo Abe's policies. But I'm so afraid he is going to get Japan into a war no one can win.
We were peaceful and safe before the constitutional revision. Now nationalism and anger is flaring up all across East Asia.
>>52057432
So? Remove the 'm.' you fucking idiot
>>52057502
neat
>>52057535
Isn't most japs against Abe's changes on the military and the article?
You know, they don't have a minimal chance against China.
>>52057576
I got it from a set of 10 pics from /k/. Maybe they have more. I only got those two.
>>52057535
To be fair, If I had China as a neighbour I'd want the shackles removed. Though getting involved with the Middle east when you have no reason to is pure folly.
>>52057578
Offensively no, defensively China doesn't have much chance of reaching Japan itself with ground forces.
>>52057566
How?
>>52057578
Oh surely. The few actual Japanese you meet on 4chan are generally apprehensive to the change. Including me.
It's like America going and amending our second amendment because a few more school shootings happened than usual. There was no reason to change it. Japan has been at peace for 70 years because we learned what militarism causes. Japan would still be at peace without the change.
>>52057097
>>52057003
top kek
>>52057038
>tfw when I try to sympathize with canada for getting bullied all day and I don't even get a (You)
>>52057637
How bad is it Chinese navy?
>>52057657
Liked the color, 10/10. We have some ugly blue greyish.
>>52057689
Oh. Saw the protests against there. Mostly young and very old people.
>>52057613
But the constitution allowed us to defend ourselves. The Chinese are no more aggressive than they were in the Maoist days, and America would defend us with or without the change.
The shackles were made for a reason. Japanese conservatives are extremely powerful. They always have been, and they always have hated the constitution.
All this is doing is making Japan's military more of a dog heeding America's call. We gain nothing but politician's wet dreams of the past.
IT AIN'T ME
IT AIN'T MEEEE
>>52057791
because the norm is to bully canada
get a (You) anyway family
>>52057811
Middle aged people don't have time to protest. It's the elderly conservatives and businessmen who supported the change.
China's navy would lose versus America and ours if they attacked Japan. America might lose if they attacked China without us, which explains the constitutional change. They want our guarantee to fight wherever they go.
>>52057613
The Japanese military hasn't seen combat for 70 years now, it couldn't hurt to get a little real world experiecne
>>52057839
Who shot Gook?
It ain't me!!!
>>52057905
Where? The only thing Japan would be allowed to help out with is an active unjustifies attack on our ally, America. We won't be allowed to participate anywhere else.
No Libyas or Iraqs. Even Afghanistan would be pushing it with the change.
>>52056821
just get a navy again and replace your old F-18s and we'll be happy.
>>52057876
Thanks family, one good (You) deserves another
>>52058052
>machine gun
>over the ocean
For vat purvose?
>>52058101
Isn't that the one that got delayed because the door hinge would break if someone stepped on it?
>>52058141
>For vat purvose?
perforating bloated whale carcass so it can sink
duh
>>52057885
What's US position on that?
Are you real Japanese? Took me a while to understand it. So if US attacks China alone they lose, right? And with Japan along they win.
>>52058205
link related
http://dbtv.no/3963323952001#Her_skyter_Kystvakten_hvalen_med_maskingevaer
>>52058141
Small boats. The biggest threat when travelling through narrow straits is small ships packed with explosives, thats why they started putting hellfires and .50 calibers on SH-60's. Also anti-piracy shit.
>tfw no US Navy gf
>>52058141
No idea tbqh.
helicopters are sexy
God if trump wins i hope he tells us to fuck off and stop leeching off their defense
He said he wasnt a fan of giving military aid to japan and shit. Think hell tell us to fuck off too if he wins?
We REALLY should spend more on defense
>>52058214
The US nominally opposed it before Abe's election, and now fully supports it.
The US plays politics like any nation.
I am Nisei. My mother is from Sapporo. I've been to Japan many times.
America in 2015 would be China's navy 1v1 of course. But in 2020? 2025? Who knows.
Japan's basing, naval support, and logistics would make China's life much more difficult.
The only issue is that I'm one of those people who thinks that our constitutional revision has only angered the Chinese more and given them more propaganda. Thus leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy of militarism.
>>52058230
Right out of our research playbook.
>>52058248
All the Navy ladies are short and fat, but some were quite qt
>>52058576
Trudeau will tell him it's 2017.
>>52058576
It depends more on your president than ours. I don't see JT ever giving in and spending more on defense because he cares too much about his own bullshit hes spewing (all leaders do). Its up to Canadians electing a president who is serious about it. Russia is making more and more moves towards asserting claims over a larger area of the arctic and Canada has a serious need right now for a more powerful navy and air force. You guys could even shrink spending for the ground forces realistically, the most immediate need to protecting your interest (and helping us and your other allies out from a NATO perspective) would be to replace your old F-18s with a new plane (I think F-35s or new F-15Es or Super Hornets would be ideal) and building up your navy again; most importantly with some modern submarines that actually work and a few destroyers- would be great to have our northern neighbor outfitted with a few Arleigh Burkes with SM-3 (anti-ballistic missile) capabilities. You guys could buy those for cheaper than it would cost to develop your own, and I'd imagine we'd sell you the license so you could build them in your own yards. As for submarines, nuclear subs are obviously ideal for operating under the arctic, but JT would probably never allow that.
>>52058576
DUDE IT'S, LIKE, 2016 AND SHIT
WE SHOULD LIKE, SMOKE SOME WEED OR SOMETHING LOL
I MEAN IT'S LIKE TOTALLY 2016 LMAO
#REFUGEESWELCOME
>>52058776
>would be great to have our northern neighbor outfitted with a few Arleigh Burkes with SM-3 (anti-ballistic missile) capabilities. You guys could buy those for cheaper than it would cost to develop your own, and I'd imagine we'd sell you the license so you could build them in your own yards
Burkes are expensive as fuck compared to the ships most navies have.
>>52058915
>Burkes are expensive as fuck compared to the ships most navies have.
South Korea, Japan and Spain operate ships built on nearly the same systems but on their own vessels, if they can afford it, canada can. And I imagine we could let Canada build the Arleigh Burke hulls in their own shipyards. That would be cheaper than an entirely new program.
Also keep in mind, the US lists its ship prices with all systems (and sometimes weapons) outfitted, a lot of countries list their ship prices at the vessel price only- the build out is costed seperately, often making the US ship look vastly more expensive.
>>52058996
We don't list ours significantly differently than other nations. Generally our shit is more expensive per amount of effectiveness than anywhere else, but that's because we spend a lot of incremental gains in effectiveness. It's what wins wars.
Also, Canada has no shipyards capable of a 10k ton destroyer.
If anything, they are probably going to buy our recently retired Perry's. Some decent ASW on those and good endurance.
>>52055917
we need to be heavy to carry our shitty neighbors
>>52056493
>>52057689
>How?
Are you fucking kidding me?
